
Cheers, Neilster
Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets
Maybe !ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets
Rob Jenkins continues to do an enormous number of naval unit writeups every week.
Warspite1ORIGINAL: Froonp
Maybe !ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets
Rob Jenkins continues to do an enormous number of naval unit writeups every week.
But he hasn't answered the question : Why Gettysburg is not the name of a big ship [:D].
But he hasn't answered the question : Why Gettysburg is not the name of a big ship
ORIGINAL: Cheesehead
But he hasn't answered the question : Why Gettysburg is not the name of a big ship
Maybe so as not to offend a certain section of the country????
The South had a different name for the battle though (Sharpsburg).ORIGINAL: sajbalk
Vicksburg is for the city, I think. Antietam was efectively a tie, so neither side is upset.
In the fabulous TV series The Civil War by Ken Burns, the author Shelby Foote is quoted saying the reason for this, IIRC, was something to do with the Southern forces being more rural oriented while the Northerners were more urban oriented...ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets
The South had a different name for the battle though (Sharpsburg).ORIGINAL: sajbalk
Vicksburg is for the city, I think. Antietam was efectively a tie, so neither side is upset.
ORIGINAL: sajbalk
Vicksburg is for the city, I think. Antietam was efectively a tie, so neither side is upset.
ORIGINAL: paulderynck
In the fabulous TV series The Civil War by Ken Burns, the author Shelby Foote is quoted saying the reason for this, IIRC, was something to do with the Southern forces being more rural oriented while the Northerners were more urban oriented...ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets
The South had a different name for the battle though (Sharpsburg).ORIGINAL: sajbalk
Vicksburg is for the city, I think. Antietam was efectively a tie, so neither side is upset.
ORIGINAL: sajbalk
Vicksburg is for the city, I think. Antietam was efectively a tie, so neither side is upset.
WHUTT !ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets
He also found a number of small errors in the data files, the only crucial one being that Bergen had been listed as an Objective city.
ORIGINAL: morgil
WHUTT !ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets
He also found a number of small errors in the data files, the only crucial one being that Bergen had been listed as an Objective city.
Bergen is no longer a Objective City !?!
Thats a bleeping scandal, you know how much hard work it took to sneak it in there ? [;)]
Well, I can concede that by 1945 it was not such an important place, but from 1070 to atleast 1830s it was the most important Norwegian city. The Frigate HMS Tartar was almost sunk here 201 years ago by fire from rowing boats, and its a really nice place, though we claim to be a rainy city just too keep the people from Oslo away. (Only 3 meters of rain last year.)
That should count for something [:)]
Anyways, awesome job guys, I'm so looking forward to this game.
And on a side note..
USS Halyburton, how scary is that...Can you get electrocuted when you fire the main guns ?
ORIGINAL: morgil
WHUTT !ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets
He also found a number of small errors in the data files, the only crucial one being that Bergen had been listed as an Objective city.
Bergen is no longer a Objective City !?!
Thats a bleeping scandal, you know how much hard work it took to sneak it in there ? [;)]
Well, I can concede that by 1945 it was not such an important place, but from 1070 to atleast 1830s it was the most important Norwegian city. The Frigate HMS Tartar was almost sunk here 201 years ago by fire from rowing boats, and its a really nice place, though we claim to be a rainy city just too keep the people from Oslo away. (Only 3 meters of rain last year.)
That should count for something [:)]
Anyways, awesome job guys, I'm so looking forward to this game.
And on a side note..
USS Halyburton, how scary is that...Can you get electrocuted when you fire the main guns ?