Early Invasion?

Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: The German-Soviet War 1941-1945 is a turn-based World War II strategy game stretching across the entire Eastern Front. Gamers can engage in an epic campaign, including division-sized battles with realistic and historical terrain, weather, orders of battle, logistics and combat results.

The critically and fan-acclaimed Eastern Front mega-game Gary Grigsby’s War in the East just got bigger and better with Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: Don to the Danube! This expansion to the award-winning War in the East comes with a wide array of later war scenarios ranging from short but intense 6 turn bouts like the Battle for Kharkov (1942) to immense 37-turn engagements taking place across multiple nations like Drama on the Danube (Summer 1944 – Spring 1945).

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21, elmo3

Post Reply
User avatar
Capt Cliff
Posts: 1714
Joined: Wed May 22, 2002 4:48 pm
Location: Northwest, USA

Early Invasion?

Post by Capt Cliff »

I heard or read some place that the German intervention into Greece cause Barbarossa to be postponed until June. This is an easy "what if" ... what if the Itie's didn't screw up? The invasion into Russia goes off on April 1st ... April Fools day!!!
Capt. Cliff
User avatar
Joel Billings
Posts: 33505
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Contact:

RE: Early Invasion?

Post by Joel Billings »

Yes and no. I've also heard that late spring rains lasted into June so the Germans would have only gained weeks at most. Of course two weeks in the summer of 41 is worth a lot.
All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard
User avatar
Stryder
Posts: 188
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:01 pm

RE: Early Invasion?

Post by Stryder »

an alternative where the Soviets did not leave the "Stalin Line" defenses would be interesting too... what if they only set security/police troops into Poland and kept the bulk of their forces on the original borders... Air force would have been less vulnerable, major units would not have been caught by surprise and defenses would have been better as well.
User avatar
Joel Billings
Posts: 33505
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Contact:

RE: Early Invasion?

Post by Joel Billings »

That could be very tough on the Germans, since the Soviets usually lose around 1 million men on or near the border.
All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard
User avatar
Stryder
Posts: 188
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:01 pm

RE: Early Invasion?

Post by Stryder »

agreed! [:)] just was thinking of Soviet what-ifs... everyone thinks of the German ones..

other random what-ifs:

*How about no Stalin purge of the officers corp?
*What if the USSR was not surprised?
*What if USSR had not supplied so many raw materials to Germany in 1940-41?
*What if the Germans were not so evil and had befriended or at least tolerated ALL locals
that had been "liberated"... less partisans, more volunteers perhaps.

(I can't wait to play the actual 1941 scenario, no what-ifs)

User avatar
Shupov
Posts: 359
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 3:02 am
Location: United States

RE: Early Invasion?

Post by Shupov »

Or the ultimate Soviet what-if - On May 15, 1941 General Zhukov proposed a preemptive offensive against the Wehrmacht in Poland! Although initialed by Timoshenko, Stalin probably never saw it.
"The Motherland Calls"

Mamayev Kurgan, Stalingrad (Volgograd)
User avatar
Stryder
Posts: 188
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:01 pm

RE: Early Invasion?

Post by Stryder »

Wow! i just read that same passage in When Titans Clashed (Glantz) tonight... funny! Stalin was so desperate to avoid war in 1941, I can't imagine he would have approved and the USSR could barely take out Finland so it would have been a poor offensive with the Red Army still not fully deployed to the new frontier.
The preemptive attack in spring of 1942 in the Kharkov area did not hurt the German 42 offensive much...may have helped since so many men and material were annihilated
User avatar
Shupov
Posts: 359
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 3:02 am
Location: United States

RE: Early Invasion?

Post by Shupov »

Agree - Zhukov's proposal was normal contingency planning.  Stalin had no mindset to attack Hitler.  Russia was still sending trainloads of raw materials to Germany the day the invasion started! 
 
It's still fascinating to think what Zhukov could have done with 23,000 tanks on offense!
"The Motherland Calls"

Mamayev Kurgan, Stalingrad (Volgograd)
User avatar
Stryder
Posts: 188
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:01 pm

RE: Early Invasion?

Post by Stryder »

Absolutely!

the what-if game is a good diversion... what if Patton had not fallen into disgrace and was in Bradley's position for Normandy is a good one too..
User avatar
wworld7
Posts: 1726
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 2:57 am
Location: The Nutmeg State

RE: Early Invasion?

Post by wworld7 »

ORIGINAL: jfarber

Absolutely!

the what-if game is a good diversion... what if Patton had not fallen into disgrace and was in Bradley's position for Normandy is a good one too..

Fate worked out well. IMO, Gen. Patton was much better as an army commander than he would have been as an army group commander. Can anybody really think he would have worked well under Monty?
Flipper
User avatar
Capt Cliff
Posts: 1714
Joined: Wed May 22, 2002 4:48 pm
Location: Northwest, USA

RE: Early Invasion?

Post by Capt Cliff »

Getting way off the topic there Gents ... Eastern Front not Western ...

Another if Japan declares war on Russia when Germany declares war on USA. That move by Hitler was so wonky ... why the hell did he do it?? [&:] The valiant Tuetonic knight comes to the aid of his ally, but not reciporcal!!! [X(]
Capt. Cliff
Endsieg
Posts: 92
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 11:31 pm
Location: North Atlantic Treaty Organization

RE: Early Invasion?

Post by Endsieg »

ORIGINAL: Capt Cliff

The valiant Tuetonic knight comes to the aid of his ally, but not reciporcal!!! [X(]
i wont comment on Teutonic or reciprocal...internet typos are as common as the housefly, often just as annoying.
Still..., unless Cliff was being ironic, ...to equate Hitler with a valiant Teutonic knight coming to the aid of his ally seems beyond comic...i guess it was meant ironically...
User avatar
Shupov
Posts: 359
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 3:02 am
Location: United States

RE: Early Invasion?

Post by Shupov »

Typos or bad metaphors aside, I agree with the Captain. Hitler declaring war on the US is one of his most inexplicable acts. Germany certainly needed the Japanese to declare war on the Soviet Union but it was not to be. Perhaps it was a show of bravado (or panic?) in the face of the Soviet winter offensive then unfolding.
"The Motherland Calls"

Mamayev Kurgan, Stalingrad (Volgograd)
User avatar
Capt Cliff
Posts: 1714
Joined: Wed May 22, 2002 4:48 pm
Location: Northwest, USA

RE: Early Invasion?

Post by Capt Cliff »

ORIGINAL: Endsieg

ORIGINAL: Capt Cliff

The valiant Tuetonic knight comes to the aid of his ally, but not reciporcal!!! [X(]
i wont comment on Teutonic or reciprocal...internet typos are as common as the housefly, often just as annoying.
Still..., unless Cliff was being ironic, ...to equate Hitler with a valiant Teutonic knight coming to the aid of his ally seems beyond comic...i guess it was meant ironically...

In his minds eye "he" thought he was!! Oh an the Teutonic Knights were not ALL that good ... hunting down peasants in the Baltic states for sport or to cleans the world of vermin was quite common.
Capt. Cliff
Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series”