Flying low enough?

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Puhis
Posts: 1741
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:14 pm
Location: Finland

RE: Flying low enough?

Post by Puhis »

ORIGINAL: sfbaytf

I think the Japanese called them flying cigars.

Actually they called them flying zippos...

Edit: Flying zippo might have been american nickname. Japanese called Bettys Type One Lighter... [:D]
User avatar
Sheytan
Posts: 811
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:53 pm

RE: Flying low enough?

Post by Sheytan »

Never had the pleasure of that, but while stationed in Germany I was honored to whitness a number of ground attack strikes while serving with the First Infantry Division during the Reforger excercises.

Never ceased to amaze me how low some of strike missions were, and who can forget the sound of a A10 firing its cannon. Truely awesome.
ORIGINAL: CraigDeaton

I've done a bit of low-level flying when I was much younger. If you you have the "need for speed", that's how you satisfy it!

Doing it through that kind of flak, and holding it together, takes balls of steel.

GREAT pictures!
User avatar
Sheytan
Posts: 811
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:53 pm

RE: Flying low enough?

Post by Sheytan »

Pic [8D]

Image
Attachments
800pxA10..flight2.jpg
800pxA10..flight2.jpg (78.23 KiB) Viewed 233 times
User avatar
Blackhorse
Posts: 1415
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Eastern US

RE: Flying low enough?

Post by Blackhorse »


Warthawgs! [&o]

An (American) tankers best friend . . . [:)]
WitP-AE -- US LCU & AI Stuff

Oddball: Why don't you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don't you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don't you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?
Moriarty: Crap!
User avatar
morganbj
Posts: 3472
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 1:36 am
Location: Mosquito Bite, Texas

RE: Flying low enough?

Post by morganbj »

ORIGINAL: Zebedee

Spot the guy who was just pulled out of the pilot pool ;)
Actually, it looks like two of them are going to be in the "pool" pretty soon, if they flinch a little.
Occasionally, and randomly, problems and solutions collide. The probability of these collisions is inversely related to the number of committees working on the solutions. -- Me.
User avatar
CEDeaton
Posts: 128
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2003 9:55 am
Location: Plano, TX
Contact:

RE: Flying low enough?

Post by CEDeaton »

ORIGINAL: Sheytan

Never had the pleasure of that, but while stationed in Germany I was honored to whitness a number of ground attack strikes while serving with the First Infantry Division during the Reforger excercises.

Never ceased to amaze me how low some of strike missions were, and who can forget the sound of a A10 firing its cannon. Truely awesome.
ORIGINAL: CraigDeaton

I've done a bit of low-level flying when I was much younger. If you you have the "need for speed", that's how you satisfy it!

Doing it through that kind of flak, and holding it together, takes balls of steel.

GREAT pictures!

When I was in flight school in Pensacola in 1984, I recall there was a Marine that got kicked off the Blue Angels because he flew under a power line and came back missing about six inches of the vertical tailplane! Locals were'nt too happy about the power outage. I'm not really sure if they booted him because he was flying too low when/where he wasn't supposed to be, or because he made a mess of it. [:-]
Semper Fi,
Craig

It's always pilot error. Sometimes the idiot just doesn't know how to fly a broken aircraft.
User avatar
Fallschirmjager
Posts: 3555
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:46 am
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee

RE: Flying low enough?

Post by Fallschirmjager »

ORIGINAL: NightFlyer

In this dramatic picture of Bettys at Tulagi, a couple of the Bettys seem to be flying only 4m or 13 feet above the water (the length of a G4M is 20m) [X(]

Image


I find it odd that their seems to be no small caliber AA fire. Note the absence of any small shell splashes.
bradfordkay
Posts: 8603
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Olympia, WA

RE: Flying low enough?

Post by bradfordkay »

ORIGINAL: Sheytan

Another...

Image


This photo clearly shows three ships burning, but the after action report that you quoted mentioned only two ships getting hit. What's the story there?
fair winds,
Brad
User avatar
lazydawg
Posts: 141
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 10:22 am
Location: Raleigh NC

RE: Flying low enough?

Post by lazydawg »

ORIGINAL: CraigDeaton

ORIGINAL: Sheytan

Never had the pleasure of that, but while stationed in Germany I was honored to whitness a number of ground attack strikes while serving with the First Infantry Division during the Reforger excercises.

Never ceased to amaze me how low some of strike missions were, and who can forget the sound of a A10 firing its cannon. Truely awesome.
ORIGINAL: CraigDeaton

I've done a bit of low-level flying when I was much younger. If you you have the "need for speed", that's how you satisfy it!

Doing it through that kind of flak, and holding it together, takes balls of steel.

GREAT pictures!

When I was in flight school in Pensacola in 1984, I recall there was a Marine that got kicked off the Blue Angels because he flew under a power line and came back missing about six inches of the vertical tailplane! Locals were'nt too happy about the power outage. I'm not really sure if they booted him because he was flying too low when/where he wasn't supposed to be, or because he made a mess of it. [:-]


[:)] Even though he didn't make a mess of anything, one of my relatives had his pilots license suspended for flying his cropduster under the Mississippi River bridge at Memphis.
User avatar
NightFlyer
Posts: 68
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:48 am

RE: Flying low enough?

Post by NightFlyer »

Fog of War maybe [:D]

I think they are flying so low so that the AA can't target them since they can't track so low. They would have had to pop up to a 100' maybe to launch their torps. The B25 also did pre-radar nap-of-the-earth flying for their skip bombing. I like the B25s fitted with the extra cannon for that extra touch. Apparently the whole plane shuddered when it was fired. In the pic below, the guy seems to be fidgeting with yet another add-on gun pod.

Image
"It is generally inadvisable to eject directly over the area you just bombed.." -U.S. Air Force Manual
SteveD64
Posts: 570
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 8:03 pm
Location: Shaker Hts, Ohio, USA

RE: Flying low enough?

Post by SteveD64 »

ORIGINAL: bradfordkay

ORIGINAL: Sheytan

Another...

Image


This photo clearly shows three ships burning, but the after action report that you quoted mentioned only two ships getting hit. What's the story there?

I think one or two of the burning "ships" are actually downed Bettys.
User avatar
NightFlyer
Posts: 68
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:48 am

RE: Flying low enough?

Post by NightFlyer »

ORIGINAL: CLEVELAND

ORIGINAL: bradfordkay

ORIGINAL: Sheytan

Another...

Image


This photo clearly shows three ships burning, but the after action report that you quoted mentioned only two ships getting hit. What's the story there?

I think one or two of the burning "ships" are actually downed Bettys.

I got this off the http://www.history.navy.mil site, quote:

"Photo #: NH 69114

Guadalcanal - Tulagi Operation, August 1942

Scene just after the Japanese torpedo plane attack on shipping between Guadalcanal and Tulagi, 8 August 1942.
USS George F. Elliott (AP-13) is afire in the left center. She had been hit by a crashing enemy aircraft. The other two smoke plumes mark the locations of planes that crashed into the water.

Collection of Admiral Richmond K. Turner, USN.

U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph."

Those are pretty big plumes for an aircraft and where's the second hit ship? The other two smoke plumes appear to be near other ships. This could be early kamikaze attacks...

"It is generally inadvisable to eject directly over the area you just bombed.." -U.S. Air Force Manual
User avatar
Sheytan
Posts: 811
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:53 pm

RE: Flying low enough?

Post by Sheytan »

Destroyer Jarvis was the only ship hit in the attack, she was struck by one torpedo. The other smoke plumes are from crashed Bettys. Bear in mind the Betty had long legs for a reason. It was a flying fuel depot. No idea what kind of av gas they used but it burns all the same.

In the photo you are quoting the USS Elliott was struck by a crashing Betty, likely the pilot knew he was going down and decided to take someone with him.
ORIGINAL: bradfordkay

ORIGINAL: Sheytan

Another...

Image


This photo clearly shows three ships burning, but the after action report that you quoted mentioned only two ships getting hit. What's the story there?
User avatar
Shark7
Posts: 7936
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: The Big Nowhere

RE: Flying low enough?

Post by Shark7 »

ORIGINAL: NightFlyer

Fog of War maybe [:D]

I think they are flying so low so that the AA can't target them since they can't track so low. They would have had to pop up to a 100' maybe to launch their torps. The B25 also did pre-radar nap-of-the-earth flying for their skip bombing. I like the B25s fitted with the extra cannon for that extra touch. Apparently the whole plane shuddered when it was fired. In the pic below, the guy seems to be fidgeting with yet another add-on gun pod.

Image


Bingo! They are flying lower than defensive AAA guns can depress...effectively exploiting a 'flak gap'.
Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'
User avatar
stuman
Posts: 3945
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 8:59 am
Location: Elvis' Hometown

RE: Flying low enough?

Post by stuman »

ORIGINAL: ncdawg

ORIGINAL: CraigDeaton

ORIGINAL: Sheytan

Never had the pleasure of that, but while stationed in Germany I was honored to whitness a number of ground attack strikes while serving with the First Infantry Division during the Reforger excercises.

Never ceased to amaze me how low some of strike missions were, and who can forget the sound of a A10 firing its cannon. Truely awesome.



When I was in flight school in Pensacola in 1984, I recall there was a Marine that got kicked off the Blue Angels because he flew under a power line and came back missing about six inches of the vertical tailplane! Locals were'nt too happy about the power outage. I'm not really sure if they booted him because he was flying too low when/where he wasn't supposed to be, or because he made a mess of it. [:-]


[:)] Even though he didn't make a mess of anything, one of my relatives had his pilots license suspended for flying his cropduster under the Mississippi River bridge at Memphis.


He is a brave man. There is not a lot of clearence there. Wish I had seen that [:)]
" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley

Image
User avatar
Reg
Posts: 2790
Joined: Fri May 26, 2000 8:00 am
Location: NSW, Australia

RE: Flying low enough?

Post by Reg »


Another contemporary 'Under the Bridge' incident. Though not caught on film Robert Taylor has commemorated it in one of his art works....

Under the Bridge

Cheers,
Reg.

(One day I will learn to spell - or check before posting....)
Uh oh, Firefox has a spell checker!! What excuse can I use now!!!
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: Flying low enough?

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: NightFlyer

ORIGINAL: CLEVELAND

ORIGINAL: bradfordkay





This photo clearly shows three ships burning, but the after action report that you quoted mentioned only two ships getting hit. What's the story there?

I think one or two of the burning "ships" are actually downed Bettys.

I got this off the http://www.history.navy.mil site, quote:

"Photo #: NH 69114

Guadalcanal - Tulagi Operation, August 1942

Scene just after the Japanese torpedo plane attack on shipping between Guadalcanal and Tulagi, 8 August 1942.
USS George F. Elliott (AP-13) is afire in the left center. She had been hit by a crashing enemy aircraft. The other two smoke plumes mark the locations of planes that crashed into the water.

Collection of Admiral Richmond K. Turner, USN.

U.S. Naval Historical Center Photograph."

Those are pretty big plumes for an aircraft and where's the second hit ship? The other two smoke plumes appear to be near other ships. This could be early kamikaze attacks...




guess if the Betties wouldn´t be severly damaged, none would deliberetely crash it into a transport. Those pilots were just too experienced to kamikaze with an undamaged bomber when they know they would hurt the enemy more in upcoming attacks if they would be able to return.
User avatar
jmscho
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2004 11:36 am
Location: York, UK

RE: Flying low enough?

Post by jmscho »

A story I once heard from slightly later than the Pacific War.

An RAF Buccaneer taking part in a Red Flag exercise landed with telegraph wire trailing from the tail. When asked about it the pilot said that he was climbing when he hit them. It was also said that the aircraft needed to climb a bit to give it room to put the undercarriage down.
User avatar
thegreatwent
Posts: 3011
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 3:42 am
Location: Denver, CO

RE: Flying low enough?

Post by thegreatwent »

Warthawgs!

An (American) tankers best friend . . .

We in the Light Infantry loved them also. Dragons and AT-4's didn't inspire confidence when facing armor [X(]
User avatar
NightFlyer
Posts: 68
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:48 am

RE: Flying low enough?

Post by NightFlyer »

I saw two A-10s at an airshow once. Their agility and speed astounded me. Of course the whole plane was built around the 30 mm GAU-8/A Avenger Gatling gun pictured below There has been talk of retiring this pre-fly-by-wire aircraft, but the pilots who fly it seem to love it.

Image
"It is generally inadvisable to eject directly over the area you just bombed.." -U.S. Air Force Manual
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”