Should units named after places be static?

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
fbs
Posts: 1048
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 3:52 am

Should units named after places be static?

Post by fbs »

Example: "Hawaiian USAAF"; you can move it around (I don't intend to), but then it will look odd to have the Hawaii USAAF Air HQ located in New Guinea instead of Hawaii...

Another example: I can walk my Merak Base Force, Kalidjati Base Force and a bunch of other base forces in Java and walk all of them to Batavia. It will look odd that Merak Base Force is no longer in Merak...

If a unit is named after a place, then it should be static to that place; if a unit can walk, then it should have a number, I think so... [:D]

Cheers [:D]
fbs
User avatar
tanjman
Posts: 668
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Griffin, GA

RE: Should units named after places be static?

Post by tanjman »

ORIGINAL: fbs

Example: "Hawaiian USAAF"; you can move it around (I don't intend to), but then it will look odd to have the Hawaii USAAF Air HQ located in New Guinea instead of Hawaii...

Another example: I can walk my Merak Base Force, Kalidjati Base Force and a bunch of other base forces in Java and walk all of them to Batavia. It will look odd that Merak Base Force is no longer in Merak...

If a unit is named after a place, then it should be static to that place; if a unit can walk, then it should have a number, I think so... [:D]

Cheers [:D]
fbs

In scenario 1 Hawaiian USAAF renames to Seventh USAAF on 420201.
Gunner's Mate: A Boatswain's Mate with a hunting license.
donkey_roxor
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 5:03 pm

RE: Should units named after places be static?

Post by donkey_roxor »

But the fact is that historically, they probably could move. If, e.g., Merak was going to fall, it's certainly plausible that elements of or the entire Merak BF would have been evacuated elsewhere.
rockmedic109
Posts: 2441
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 11:02 am
Location: Citrus Heights, CA

RE: Should units named after places be static?

Post by rockmedic109 »

Some of the named Dutch Base Forces are part of a larger Base Force.  THey recombine into North and South Base Force.  If you need justification to move them away from their named area, you could move them to recombine them.
fbs
Posts: 1048
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 3:52 am

RE: Should units named after places be static?

Post by fbs »

ORIGINAL: tanjman

In scenario 1 Hawaiian USAAF renames to Seventh USAAF on 420201.


Oh, that's a good point.
fbs
Posts: 1048
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 3:52 am

RE: Should units named after places be static?

Post by fbs »

ORIGINAL: rockmedic109

Some of the named Dutch Base Forces are part of a larger Base Force.  THey recombine into North and South Base Force.  If you need justification to move them away from their named area, you could move them to recombine them.

That's another good point
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”