Rest?

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
fbs
Posts: 1048
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 3:52 am

Rest?

Post by fbs »


I'm confused (for a change) with the difference between these settings for an air group on mission Naval Search:

80% Search
80% Search, 20% Rest

Are they the same thing?

Cheers! [:D]
fbs
User avatar
vlcz
Posts: 387
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 9:18 am
Location: Spain

RE: Rest?

Post by vlcz »

Exactly the same, as long as I understand from rule 7.2.1.8
"Long Range CAP over TF’s are less effective then normal CAP. When Naval Search, ASW Patrol or Training is selected as the Mission, the corresponding Nav Search, ASW Patrol or Training Level dictates the percentage of the unit that will fly this Mission while the remainder of the unit rests."


User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12463
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Rest?

Post by michaelm75au »

ORIGINAL: fbs


I'm confused (for a change) with the difference between these settings for an air group on mission Naval Search:

80% Search
80% Search, 20% Rest

Are they the same thing?

Cheers! [:D]
fbs
yes.
[Edit: Assuming you picked Rest as the secondary mission]
Michael
User avatar
AW1Steve
Posts: 14527
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:32 am
Location: Mordor aka Illlinois

RE: Rest?

Post by AW1Steve »

Maybe it's modelled on real life. In real life (at least USN patrol crews) you have to mandate "Crew rest" (which means you had better be in your room trying to get some sleep). If you don't have mandated rest , you take it to mean you can go sightseeing , chase girls, drink yourself silly and do everything but "rest". [:D]
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: Rest?

Post by Chickenboy »

Doesn't leaving the balance of activities (in this example 20%) leave some discretionary options open to the local commander? For example, if I set my PBY-5s to "Naval Attack" and then in the subscreen change their % effort allocation to: 80% search, won't 20% of them fly off for naval attack, given the opportunity?

I think doing the 80% search, 20% rest mandates that they do these activities *and no others*. Not 'nailing down' the other 20% lets them do something else-at least that's my take.
Image
User avatar
CEDeaton
Posts: 128
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2003 9:55 am
Location: Plano, TX
Contact:

RE: Rest?

Post by CEDeaton »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Doesn't leaving the balance of activities (in this example 20%) leave some discretionary options open to the local commander? For example, if I set my PBY-5s to "Naval Attack" and then in the subscreen change their % effort allocation to: 80% search, won't 20% of them fly off for naval attack, given the opportunity?

I think doing the 80% search, 20% rest mandates that they do these activities *and no others*. Not 'nailing down' the other 20% lets them do something else-at least that's my take.


I tend to agree with you on this. In particular, I've noticed fighter groups scrambling what seemed to be unassigned planes/pilots beyond the amount that had been placed on CAP duty. I would assume that an assigned rest percentage would have prevented that from occuring.
Semper Fi,
Craig

It's always pilot error. Sometimes the idiot just doesn't know how to fly a broken aircraft.
fbs
Posts: 1048
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 3:52 am

RE: Rest?

Post by fbs »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Doesn't leaving the balance of activities (in this example 20%) leave some discretionary options open to the local commander? For example, if I set my PBY-5s to "Naval Attack" and then in the subscreen change their % effort allocation to: 80% search, won't 20% of them fly off for naval attack, given the opportunity?

I think doing the 80% search, 20% rest mandates that they do these activities *and no others*. Not 'nailing down' the other 20% lets them do something else-at least that's my take.


Err... will they actually rest if the main mission is naval attack?

I mean, if I set mission to Naval Attack and have 0% rest and 0% patrol... but they don't attack anything... will they have rested? It's not like they are in leave if they remain on alert.

Cheers :mrgreen:
fbs
User avatar
invernomuto
Posts: 942
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 4:29 pm
Location: Turin, Italy

RE: Rest?

Post by invernomuto »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Doesn't leaving the balance of activities (in this example 20%) leave some discretionary options open to the local commander? For example, if I set my PBY-5s to "Naval Attack" and then in the subscreen change their % effort allocation to: 80% search, won't 20% of them fly off for naval attack, given the opportunity?

I think doing the 80% search, 20% rest mandates that they do these activities *and no others*. Not 'nailing down' the other 20% lets them do something else-at least that's my take.

If you select naval attack as mission, if you set 80% of the planes to search, the remaining 20% WILL perform naval attack if there is a valid target in range.
The unassigned aircrafts will rest ONLY if you select Naval Search, ASW Patrol or Training as mission.

Bye
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”