AE Naval and OOB Issues [OUTDATED]

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Roko
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 3:41 pm

RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues

Post by Roko »

Im curious why in AE the top speed of many ships is reduced in compared to
Witp and available data. A few examples                
                         AE     Witp
cl. Shiratsuyu    32      34
cl. Akitsuki         32      33
cl. Fubuki           33      38
herwin
Posts: 6047
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 9:20 pm
Location: Sunderland, UK
Contact:

RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues

Post by herwin »

ORIGINAL: Roko

Im curious why in AE the top speed of many ships is reduced in compared to
Witp and available data. A few examples                
                        AE     Witp
cl. Shiratsuyu    32      34
cl. Akitsuki         32      33
cl. Fubuki           33      38

Trials speed was often inflated. Top speed should be operational top speed.
Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
Buck Beach
Posts: 1974
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Upland,CA,USA

RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues

Post by Buck Beach »

For the fuel starved Allied AI players (at the war's inception) I offer this link for consideration:

http://merchantships2.tripod.com/ian/ia ... page1.html

Here are a few Tankers that may be available:

S.S. Albertolite
H.M. Storey (sunk in 1943) H.M. Storey II is in the game with a 10/18/43 arrive date.
S.S. Idaho (game has the BB and a cargo vessel by this name) another link showing it as a tanker http://www.militarymuseum.org/Montebello.html)
S.S. Connecticut

Within this history is a couple additional Cargo ships which may not be listed in the game.

Fort Camosun (Canadian)
M.V. Kookaburra (Swedish)

If posts such as this should be posted in the general threads, let me know.
User avatar
scott64
Posts: 4019
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:34 pm
Location: Colorado
Contact:

RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues

Post by scott64 »

Does CV Enterprise respawn if sunk? I lost her and has not shown up as being available..yet. [:)]
Lucky for you, tonight it's just me


Any ship can be a minesweeper..once !! :)

http://suspenseandmystery.blogspot.com/
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

Transport TF to pick up A/C fragment?

Post by Chickenboy »

I went through the first 5 pages of this thead to see if this was addressed elsewhere.  I didn't see it.  I also didn't see it on the entire list of the first patch issue fixes so, I've done some due diligence before posting here.

Playing allied vs. Jap AI (v. hard), mid-February 1942.  I lost the Lexington in an exchange for Soryu and damage to Zuikaku in the DEI Southwest of The Celebes.  Planes from the Lex diverted to nearest landmass (base on SW Celebes corner nearest Soerbaja).  I eventually transfered them over to Java (Soerbaja) where they reside.

One of the DB units from the Lexington is sitting at 1 ready A/C 15 reserve, although there's more than sufficient pilots, aviation support and supply.  None are damaged.  I can't get the planes out of ready state into action.

The weird thing (the purpose of this post) follows.  While working out a turn, I noticed a TF between Midway Is. and Hawaii.  This TF consisted of one ship that was on a "Transport" mission.  It originated from SF and was tasked with picking up the DB fragment in Java (!).  Of course the route that it was going to take went right past Saipan and Guam, through the captured DEI / PI bases, etc.  Naturally, it would have been sunk had I not noticed it.

Is the computer creating odd TFs like this to pick up A/C fragments?  I know that I never gave any such orders.  I'd be happy to post a save to someone if it would help.  This sounds and looks 'buggy' to me.

Edited to add: I have not yet patched-playing stock AE.
Image
User avatar
scott64
Posts: 4019
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:34 pm
Location: Colorado
Contact:

RE: Transport TF to pick up A/C fragment?

Post by scott64 »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

I went through the first 5 pages of this thead to see if this was addressed elsewhere.  I didn't see it.  I also didn't see it on the entire list of the first patch issue fixes so, I've done some due diligence before posting here.

Playing allied vs. Jap AI (v. hard), mid-February 1942.  I lost the Lexington in an exchange for Soryu and damage to Zuikaku in the DEI Southwest of The Celebes.  Planes from the Lex diverted to nearest landmass (base on SW Celebes corner nearest Soerbaja).  I eventually transfered them over to Java (Soerbaja) where they reside.

One of the DB units from the Lexington is sitting at 1 ready A/C 15 reserve, although there's more than sufficient pilots, aviation support and supply.  None are damaged.  I can't get the planes out of ready state into action.

The weird thing (the purpose of this post) follows.  While working out a turn, I noticed a TF between Midway Is. and Hawaii.  This TF consisted of one ship that was on a "Transport" mission.  It originated from SF and was tasked with picking up the DB fragment in Java (!).  Of course the route that it was going to take went right past Saipan and Guam, through the captured DEI / PI bases, etc.  Naturally, it would have been sunk had I not noticed it.

Is the computer creating odd TFs like this to pick up A/C fragments?  I know that I never gave any such orders.  I'd be happy to post a save to someone if it would help.  This sounds and looks 'buggy' to me.
Could be...i had a fragment of AVG in a Chinese base with nowhere to get to the parent. The fragment eventually show up at the parent and recombines. [8|]
Lucky for you, tonight it's just me


Any ship can be a minesweeper..once !! :)

http://suspenseandmystery.blogspot.com/
Whisper
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:23 pm
Location: LA

RE: Transport TF to pick up A/C fragment?

Post by Whisper »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

I went through the first 5 pages of this thead to see if this was addressed elsewhere.  I didn't see it.  I also didn't see it on the entire list of the first patch issue fixes so, I've done some due diligence before posting here.

Playing allied vs. Jap AI (v. hard), mid-February 1942.  I lost the Lexington in an exchange for Soryu and damage to Zuikaku in the DEI Southwest of The Celebes.  Planes from the Lex diverted to nearest landmass (base on SW Celebes corner nearest Soerbaja).  I eventually transfered them over to Java (Soerbaja) where they reside.

One of the DB units from the Lexington is sitting at 1 ready A/C 15 reserve, although there's more than sufficient pilots, aviation support and supply.  None are damaged.  I can't get the planes out of ready state into action.

The weird thing (the purpose of this post) follows.  While working out a turn, I noticed a TF between Midway Is. and Hawaii.  This TF consisted of one ship that was on a "Transport" mission.  It originated from SF and was tasked with picking up the DB fragment in Java (!).  Of course the route that it was going to take went right past Saipan and Guam, through the captured DEI / PI bases, etc.  Naturally, it would have been sunk had I not noticed it.

Is the computer creating odd TFs like this to pick up A/C fragments?  I know that I never gave any such orders.  I'd be happy to post a save to someone if it would help.  This sounds and looks 'buggy' to me.

Edited to add: I have not yet patched-playing stock AE.
Me too. I can't get get planes out of ready state. And theres always some little number, like 1 or 2 that makes it impossible to to figure out what can go onto a CV. I cant do what I'm trying to do from the manual. Whats goning on please.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: scott1964

Does CV Enterprise respawn if sunk? I lost her and has not shown up as being available..yet. [:)]

There is no respawn at all in AE. You get all the carriers that showed up. The four that were named after sunk carriers are instead called Lexington II, Yorktown II, Wasp II, Hornet II.

Lose fewer, have more!
User avatar
Iridium
Posts: 932
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 7:50 pm
Location: Jersey

RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues

Post by Iridium »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

ORIGINAL: scott1964

Does CV Enterprise respawn if sunk? I lost her and has not shown up as being available..yet. [:)]
Lose fewer, have more!

Or lose more, have fewer....either way...[:D]
Yamato, IMO the best looking Battleship.
Image
"Hey, a packet of googly eyes! I'm so taking these." Hank Venture
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: Transport TF to pick up A/C fragment?

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

I went through the first 5 pages of this thead to see if this was addressed elsewhere.  I didn't see it.  I also didn't see it on the entire list of the first patch issue fixes so, I've done some due diligence before posting here.

Playing allied vs. Jap AI (v. hard), mid-February 1942.  I lost the Lexington in an exchange for Soryu and damage to Zuikaku in the DEI Southwest of The Celebes.  Planes from the Lex diverted to nearest landmass (base on SW Celebes corner nearest Soerbaja).  I eventually transfered them over to Java (Soerbaja) where they reside.

One of the DB units from the Lexington is sitting at 1 ready A/C 15 reserve, although there's more than sufficient pilots, aviation support and supply.  None are damaged.  I can't get the planes out of ready state into action.

The weird thing (the purpose of this post) follows.  While working out a turn, I noticed a TF between Midway Is. and Hawaii.  This TF consisted of one ship that was on a "Transport" mission.  It originated from SF and was tasked with picking up the DB fragment in Java (!).  Of course the route that it was going to take went right past Saipan and Guam, through the captured DEI / PI bases, etc.  Naturally, it would have been sunk had I not noticed it.

Is the computer creating odd TFs like this to pick up A/C fragments?  I know that I never gave any such orders.  I'd be happy to post a save to someone if it would help.  This sounds and looks 'buggy' to me.

Edited to add: I have not yet patched-playing stock AE.
I'm giving this a little bump. Thanks for the comments re: the fragment, but that's not really what I'm concerned about. I'm more concerned re: the automatic transport TF on the suicide run. Once upon a time in UV, my submarines would automatically leave port on their own with no rhyme or reason (a known and subsequently fixed bug). This seems passingly familiar.
Image
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6428
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues

Post by JeffroK »

ORIGINAL: Barb

Well, because of time zones 8th dec 41 in malaya was actually the same day as 7th dec 41 in pearl harbor [:D]

Not quite
From the above link.

3. The timing of initial Japanese attacks was as follows:

LOCAL TIME ZONE G.M.T ATTACK
0025/8 -7½ 1655/7 Landing Kota Bharu (N. Malaya).
0800/7 +10½ 1830/7 Air attack on Pearl Harbour.
0400/8 -7½ 2130/7 Air raid on Singapore.
0510/8 -8 2110/7 Air raid on Davao, Philippines.
0800/8 -8½ 2330/7 Air raid on Hongkong.
0900/8 -8½ 0030/8 Air raid on Hongkong (Kaitek) airfield; Japanese troops crossed frontier into New Territory.

10. MOVEMENTS OF FORCE "Z", 8TH-1OTH DECEMBER, 1941. (Plan 2)

Having formed his design, Admiral Phillips sailed from Singapore at 1735, 8th December. Just prior to sailing he was informed that it was doubtful if the fighter protection off Singora on 10th December could be provided.

The squadron, known as Force "Z", consisted of the Prince of Wales (flag), Repulse and the destroyers Electra, Express, Vampire and Tenedos.2 Course was shaped to the E.N.E. to pass east of the Anamba Islands in order to avoid possible minefields.


So Force Z sailed 17 hours after the initial landings, they weren't a hundred miles at sea.
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
Whisper
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:23 pm
Location: LA

RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues

Post by Whisper »

ORIGINAL: JeffK

ORIGINAL: Barb

Well, because of time zones 8th dec 41 in malaya was actually the same day as 7th dec 41 in pearl harbor [:D]

Not quite
From the above link.

3. The timing of initial Japanese attacks was as follows:

LOCAL TIME ZONE G.M.T ATTACK
0025/8 -7½ 1655/7 Landing Kota Bharu (N. Malaya).
0800/7 +10½ 1830/7 Air attack on Pearl Harbour.
0400/8 -7½ 2130/7 Air raid on Singapore.
0510/8 -8 2110/7 Air raid on Davao, Philippines.
0800/8 -8½ 2330/7 Air raid on Hongkong.
0900/8 -8½ 0030/8 Air raid on Hongkong (Kaitek) airfield; Japanese troops crossed frontier into New Territory.

10. MOVEMENTS OF FORCE "Z", 8TH-1OTH DECEMBER, 1941. (Plan 2)

Having formed his design, Admiral Phillips sailed from Singapore at 1735, 8th December. Just prior to sailing he was informed that it was doubtful if the fighter protection off Singora on 10th December could be provided.

The squadron, known as Force "Z", consisted of the Prince of Wales (flag), Repulse and the destroyers Electra, Express, Vampire and Tenedos.2 Course was shaped to the E.N.E. to pass east of the Anamba Islands in order to avoid possible minefields.


So Force Z sailed 17 hours after the initial landings, they weren't a hundred miles at sea.
This is getting wierd. This is the sixth or seventh different one of these out there.

Can somebody please do this in UTC.
User avatar
Chad Harrison
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:07 pm
Location: Boise, ID - USA

RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues

Post by Chad Harrison »

Hi all,

As I continue to work through my first turn I noticed something that seemed odd. This is an unmodified Scenario One that I am running.

When I go to the USAFFE HQ and click 'Show ships of this HQ' it correctly shows all my assigned USAFFE ships, but it also shows all the Asiatic Fleet ships. I just experimented by assigning ships to the Third US Fleet, and sure enough, they show up when I have Pacific Fleet 'Show ships of this HQ'. Also, if you click on say a ship assigned to USAFFE and click in the ship detail screen Show all ships of USAFFE, it will also show those of its subordinate command (Asiatic Fleet in this case). But if you access a ship in the subordinate command, it does *not* show the ships in the parent command. All that being said, I am not sure if this is WAD.

In other words, is it *intended* that a parent HQ shows both its ships and its subordiante command ships? Examples available at the start of the game would be the two above. Later in the game, you could see this with any number of commands. This does not appear to be a bug with my save, but the way it currently always is.

Again, this may be WAD, but it seems bass ackwards to me. It would make assigned ships to the subordiante command kind of pointless because you would always be seeing them when you accessed the ships in the parent command. Its just annoying for me because I heavily use the new ship command system and consider this one of the best improvements of AE over vanilla WitP.

Not a huge issue, but just one of those things.

Thanks in advance!

Chad
User avatar
Chad Harrison
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:07 pm
Location: Boise, ID - USA

RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues

Post by Chad Harrison »

Just as a follow up, I just tried it with the Japanese and it does the same thing. In other words, at the start of scenario 1, Southern Army has no ships assigned. But if I go to the Southern Command HQ, and click 'Show ships of this HQ', it will show the ships of all of its subordinate fleets - such as Combined Fleet.

Again, this may be WAD. I dont think it is, as it makes having ships assigned to the parent fleet pointless once you start using the subordiante fleets because you will be seeing multiple commands in the parent fleet OOB.

Just curious if this is WAD.

Thanks in advance!

Chad
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5192
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues

Post by Don Bowen »


Yes, that is the way it is supposed to work.
User avatar
Chad Harrison
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:07 pm
Location: Boise, ID - USA

RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues

Post by Chad Harrison »

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen

Yes, that is the way it is supposed to work.

As always, thanks for the reply Don. Just wanted to make sure it wasnt user error [:D]
User avatar
JuanG
Posts: 906
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 8:12 pm

RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues

Post by JuanG »

Later Yubari class (ID #1013 and #1014) has armour for device slot 4, Type 2 DC (#1700).

I assume this was a mistake left over from the device change during upgrade from the 12/41 class.
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6428
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues

Post by JeffroK »

ORIGINAL: Whisper

ORIGINAL: JeffK

ORIGINAL: Barb

Well, because of time zones 8th dec 41 in malaya was actually the same day as 7th dec 41 in pearl harbor [:D]

Not quite
From the above link.

3. The timing of initial Japanese attacks was as follows:

LOCAL TIME ZONE G.M.T ATTACK
0025/8 -7½ 1655/7 Landing Kota Bharu (N. Malaya).
0800/7 +10½ 1830/7 Air attack on Pearl Harbour.
0400/8 -7½ 2130/7 Air raid on Singapore.
0510/8 -8 2110/7 Air raid on Davao, Philippines.
0800/8 -8½ 2330/7 Air raid on Hongkong.
0900/8 -8½ 0030/8 Air raid on Hongkong (Kaitek) airfield; Japanese troops crossed frontier into New Territory.

10. MOVEMENTS OF FORCE "Z", 8TH-1OTH DECEMBER, 1941. (Plan 2)

Having formed his design, Admiral Phillips sailed from Singapore at 1735, 8th December. Just prior to sailing he was informed that it was doubtful if the fighter protection off Singora on 10th December could be provided.

The squadron, known as Force "Z", consisted of the Prince of Wales (flag), Repulse and the destroyers Electra, Express, Vampire and Tenedos.2 Course was shaped to the E.N.E. to pass east of the Anamba Islands in order to avoid possible minefields.


So Force Z sailed 17 hours after the initial landings, they weren't a hundred miles at sea.
This is getting wierd. This is the sixth or seventh different one of these out there.

Can somebody please do this in UTC.
Problem is that the file looks OK before posting, and if I go to edit it it looks OK[:(]

Landing Kota Bharu (N. Malaya). GMT 1655/7
Air attack on Pearl Harbour. GMT 1830/7
Air raid on Singapore. GMT 2130/7

Force Z sails from Singapore GMT 1205/8

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
User avatar
afspret
Posts: 857
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 9:05 pm
Location: Hanahan, SC

RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues

Post by afspret »

Came across this ship a little while ago and wonder if its the game (can't check now 'cause I'm @ work)?

HMAS Doomba (ex HMS Wexford, a RN Hunt class MSW, commissioned in 1919)
1921: sold to an Aussy shipping company and used as a cruise ship
04/09/39: requisitioned by RAN and rebuilt as a MSW
06/42: re-classified as an ASW ship (or as an AA ship according to Wiki)
03/13/46: decommissioned by RAN

Armament in RAN service: 1x4in, 1x40mm, 1x20mm, 2 ea Vickers & Lewis mgs, 51 depth charges (unknown if DCTs or racks).

Speed was rated @ 16kts

Has a similar, but not exactly the same profile as HMAS Moresby.

Wiki doesn't say much about its service, but considering it was requisitioned by the RAN in Oz, I'm guessing it spent its entire service with the RAN in and/or around Aussy waters.
John E. McCallum
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6428
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues

Post by JeffroK »

A picture of HMAS Doomba from The State Library of Victoria

http://www.slv.vic.gov.au/pictoria/b/4/ ... 0683.shtml

and another
http://www.michaelmcfadyenscuba.info/vi ... page_id=60
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”