I agree with this. It's not a fair gamble at all. It's an unnecessary gamble too.ORIGINAL: crsutton
ORIGINAL: Swenslim
This is general truth of war - the attacker is always in better position than defender, because he chooses time and place where he will concentrate his punch. Defender could only react. Of cource if defender has nice intel he can set up a trap or try to wear out attacker, such was at Midway or at Kursk.
I think you are too caution with your CV's, you need try to gamble. And as I can see your use of subs is almost fruitseless, or I am wrong ?
Nope, I disagree here. If you have lost two carriers then you can not afford to gamble. It is the first rule of poker. You never gamble more then you can afford to lose and here it is your remaining carriers.
I would look to use your carriers wherever KB is not. Kill as many cheap merchies as you can. It will pay you in spades later.
Time isn't that much of a problem here. If it was then yea, he would have no choice but to toss the dice. It isn't worth it to risk almost certain death of 2 CV's. Even if he did win tactically I don't think it would achieve much in the strategic short run (which is the most decisive factor right now imo), he would most certainly lose at least 1 CV and It would prolly be a carrier trade, if not maybe 2 Japanese carriers for 1 Allied carrier, if he got lucky and the Japanese could keep advancing anyways, so it would achieve nothing, unless he got really lucky and traded 1 allied cv for 2 jap ones. Better to mass up and strike later. No need to run in there right now in a panick.
This is just my two cents.










