Cost

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

LuckyJim1005
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:24 pm

Cost

Post by LuckyJim1005 »

Just been payed so i'd thought I would treat myself to AE.

But seriously - £52 for digital download. I was dumbstruck. I expected to pay up to about £30 but £50 for a wargame.....

Is it just me or is this really expensive for a game ?

I appreciate the time it took and the level of detail but do matrix ever consider they may be missing out on sales by such a high cost.

I suppose that those interested in the period/level will pay no matter what but I am sad I cannot justify such expense on a game I would love to play.

After all you are not starting from scratch - it is a game you have already developed and are building on.

I expect to get flamed and am doning flak vest. [:)]
User avatar
treespider
Posts: 5781
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 7:34 am
Location: Edgewater, MD

RE: Cost

Post by treespider »

As many have said...

On a per minute/ per hour/ per time played basis this is the best investment in wargaming available...
Here's a link to:
Treespider's Grand Campaign of DBB

"It is not the critic who counts, .... The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena..." T. Roosevelt, Paris, 1910
User avatar
n01487477
Posts: 4759
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 12:00 am

RE: Cost

Post by n01487477 »

Not again [8|]
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Cost

Post by witpqs »


You will be down to less than £0.10 per hour in a year, quite possibly well under a year.

When you reach that level we all expect you to come back to this thread and post your retraction!

[:D]
User avatar
SuluSea
Posts: 2397
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 2:13 pm

RE: Cost

Post by SuluSea »

Heck, I'm already below 30 cent per hour played. This is the best entertainment investment  I ever made.
"There’s no such thing as a bitter person who keeps the bitterness to himself.” ~ Erwin Lutzer
User avatar
tocaff
Posts: 4765
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:30 pm
Location: USA now in Brasil

RE: Cost

Post by tocaff »

I'm an addict and I have to admit the following:

After I bought WPO and WITP I didn't buy another game until AE was released and that was years ago.  This gives more bang for your buck than a, well forum rules preclude my continuing that chain of thought.  [;)]
Todd

I never thought that doing an AAR would be so time consuming and difficult.
www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2080768
herwin
Posts: 6047
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 9:20 pm
Location: Sunderland, UK
Contact:

RE: Cost

Post by herwin »

The price of comparable paper games is a good deal higher.
Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
LuckyJim1005
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:24 pm

RE: Cost

Post by LuckyJim1005 »

Fair point by all - except the 'Here we go again' poster. Please point out the rules that say 'dont cover what has already been said'.

Amazes me you took the time to post instead of just ignoring what has, to you, been hashed over already.

I dont think that retraction will be forthcoimg witpqs as I cannot justify the initial outlay, not the return in a year's worth of play.

Bit like saying that your £150K car only costs a £1 per hour if you drive it for 150,000 hours.

Looks good but does not really stand up to serious scrutiny.

So, is Matrix losing sales from the more casual gamer because of the price ?
Oldguard1970
Posts: 578
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:49 pm
Location: Hiawassee, GA

RE: Cost

Post by Oldguard1970 »

LuckyJim,
 
If you are like many of us, you have old games gathering dust.  You may have paid less for them, but you never played them, or only played them a few times.  For some people, that will happen with AE.  However, if you are among those of us who are "captured" by this game, you will have gotten the best "value for money" possible.
 
Will you like the game?  Will you be captured?  Read some of the AARs.  That should help you discover if you are a good candidate for this game or not.
 
 
"Rangers Lead the Way!"
User avatar
treespider
Posts: 5781
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 7:34 am
Location: Edgewater, MD

RE: Cost

Post by treespider »

ORIGINAL: LuckyJim1005

So, is Matrix losing sales from the more casual gamer because of the price ?


AE is not for the casual gamer.
Here's a link to:
Treespider's Grand Campaign of DBB

"It is not the critic who counts, .... The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena..." T. Roosevelt, Paris, 1910
User avatar
USSAmerica
Posts: 19211
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 4:32 am
Location: Graham, NC, USA
Contact:

RE: Cost

Post by USSAmerica »

LuckyJim, no, Matrix is not losing sales from more casual gamers because of the price.  Almost all "casual gamers" will not have much interest in a game that contains so much detail and micromanagement.  This is a "grognard's" game.  If that is your cup of tea, you can't find a better way to spend 52 pounds.  I've spent money on no other game in the 3 years I've owned WitP, and now AE.  There is honestly no better deal in computer wargames anywhere.  [8D]
Mike

"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett

"They need more rum punch" - Me

Image
Artwork by The Amazing Dixie
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Cost

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: LuckyJim1005

Fair point by all - except the 'Here we go again' poster. Please point out the rules that say 'dont cover what has already been said'.

Amazes me you took the time to post instead of just ignoring what has, to you, been hashed over already.

I dont think that retraction will be forthcoimg witpqs as I cannot justify the initial outlay, not the return in a year's worth of play.

Bit like saying that your £150K car only costs a £1 per hour if you drive it for 150,000 hours.

Looks good but does not really stand up to serious scrutiny.

So, is Matrix losing sales from the more casual gamer because of the price ?

OK - it's your money so take these remarks in the good nature in which they are offered. [:)]

Cannot justify the initial outlay? How many games do you purchase each year? At what cost each & total? If you wish, you have the choice of purchasing AE in place of what - 2 other games? 1.5 other games?

Want it but don't have the money now for AE? Don't buy anything now. Instead wait until you would have bought the next game. Combine the money from the two games you would have purchased, buy AE and (almost certainly) have a little left over.

Regarding the car analogy, that hardly applies. The cost ratio of AE to most games on the market is nowhere near the cost ratio of a £150K car to most cars on the market. I'm sensing that you're experiencing 'sticker shock' upon seeing the price. I understand that - so you're asking "what's so good about AE that makes it worth the price?" Fair enough. But you seem to have already made up your mind. So are you just asking out of curiosity or are you looking for some in-depth testimonials that might convince you to buy AE?
User avatar
Templer_12
Posts: 1710
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:29 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

RE: Cost

Post by Templer_12 »

ORIGINAL: LuckyJim1005

Fair point by all - except the 'Here we go again' poster. Please point out the rules that say 'dont cover what has already been said'.

>There is none!


@ LuckyJim1005,

welcome to the dark side

Here we go:
Read it, think about it - enjoy it? Post back. [;)]
Why is this game so expensive ?
tm.asp?m=2204546&mpage=1&key=



I guess that´s why n01487477 posted "Not again..." Be assured, this was no offense [:)]
User avatar
TommyG
Posts: 273
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 1:51 am
Location: Irvine Ca
Contact:

RE: Cost

Post by TommyG »

There are many of us that have been playing this game 40 hours or more a week for more than five years. I personally have spent $150 just photcopying and binding the only marginaly useful manual. But, this game is not for everybody. It can (and should) take 10 or more hours just to set up the first turn, and that is after you already know what it is you are trying to do and where everything you need to do it is located. Many of us started with board games 40 years ago and have been playing increasingly more difficult versions of this particular game since Gary's Guadalcanal Campaign came out in 1981. Yhe learning curve is steep (think cliff) and to play well also requires a great deal of familiararity with WWll equipment, geo-politics, naval and air docrrine; as well as recently added minutiae on cargo handling capacities of Cook Island ports of call. But God do I love it. And, if you do get in to it you will never, ever, regret the intial cost. Oh, yeah, you will also meet and communicate with a hell of a lot of great guys.
User avatar
RevRick
Posts: 2615
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Thomasville, GA

RE: Cost

Post by RevRick »

ORIGINAL: USS America

LuckyJim, no, Matrix is not losing sales from more casual gamers because of the price.  Almost all "casual gamers" will not have much interest in a game that contains so much detail and micromanagement.  This is a "grognard's" game.  If that is your cup of tea, you can't find a better way to spend 52 pounds.  I've spent money on no other game in the 3 years I've owned WitP, and now AE.  There is honestly no better deal in computer wargames anywhere.  [8D]

I think you may be guilty of understatement. Any "casual gamer" who investigates this game with any degree of intention and, therefore, takes a long look at the detail will try to find one of the 'beer and pretzel' games instead. And, there's nothing wrong with that. But, it's not my cup of tea for this theater... And I have been playing this theater for 15 years now on computer. Not as long as some of you, but...

"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer
LuckyJim1005
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:24 pm

RE: Cost

Post by LuckyJim1005 »

Okay guys I am going to take witpqs advice and not buy the next 2 games but get this next month. As it happens an invoice is getting paid for some software I have wrtten so WiTP AE is my next purchase.

Without getting all teared up about it can I just say that you lot should be in the pay of Matrix. You have sold me.....
LuckyJim1005
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:24 pm

RE: Cost

Post by LuckyJim1005 »

Forgot to say i have been playing Time of Wrath and have found it a little to simple. Not to detract from it, it is a great beer & pretzel game just a little lacking in some Navel aspects so I am looking for something with a bit more bite.

And yes I admit I think it was 'sticker price shock' that kicked in.

If I have 2 more glasses of wine the credit card is coming out [:)]

Missus is going to kill me..

BTW Is it just me or do any of you old time board gamers sit here thinking we are in a great age for PC wargaming ?

Apologies if I annoyed anyone.
User avatar
chesmart
Posts: 904
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:51 pm
Location: Malta

RE: Cost

Post by chesmart »

This is the definitve WW2 STRATEGY GAME simple. Nothing Comes close to it. The problem it is so addictive that all other addictions will give way to this. Kiss goodbye to your life and welcome to this world. In Dantes Inferno on the gates of hell there is written "Abandon all hope all ye who enter here" Just remember that quote as all other games will become something of the past. The only thing that Pisses me off about AE is the AI Andy Mac programmed it is wicked.
pmelheck1
Posts: 615
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 12:04 pm
Location: Alabama

RE: Cost

Post by pmelheck1 »

I've seen reviewers who have been stunned by the size and scope of AE.  As many have stated this is not for the casual gamer.   I've seen one or two reviews where the reviewer complained about the work and complexity of playing.  This is exactly what some of use are looking for.  As for me and I think some others on this board the price was not an issue.  We might have had to save our pennies to get it but their was never a doubt we were going to get it.  There is simply no other program on the market that covers the subject in the depth and detail that AE does.  The next closest runner up isn't even close.  It would be sort of like comparing TIC-TAC-TOE to 3 dimensional chess.  Tic-Tac-Toe is fun if it's what your looking for but it isn't for me.  This game isn't for the faint of heart or if you hate micromanagement, it's a hard core wargamers game.  I don't want to scare you off I always like to see new blood both to AE and to wargames but I also don't want to talk you into something that isn't going to to be your liking.  If WW2 Pacific theater is your thing NOTHING does it better than AE.

User avatar
fabertong
Posts: 4546
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 8:01 am
Location: Bristol, England, U.K.

RE: Cost

Post by fabertong »

ORIGINAL: LuckyJim1005

Forgot to say i have been playing Time of Wrath and have found it a little to simple. Not to detract from it, it is a great beer & pretzel game just a little lacking in some Navel aspects so I am looking for something with a bit more bite.

And yes I admit I think it was 'sticker price shock' that kicked in.

If I have 2 more glasses of wine the credit card is coming out [:)]

Missus is going to kill me..

BTW Is it just me or do any of you old time board gamers sit here thinking we are in a great age for PC wargaming ?

Apologies if I annoyed anyone.
Have the wine......then buy the game........I doubt you'll regret either.....
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”