If you add one optional rule, this is the best...

[Jimmer]

ORIGINAL: Marshall Ellis
Sure does!
when corps and/or leaders arrive via reinforcement then all leadership values should be recalced.

OR at least it should! :-/

I've never paid attention to it, but I will the next battle I have (with reinforcements).

[DCWhitworth]

ORIGINAL: Jimmer

ORIGINAL: Marshall Ellis
Sure does!
when corps and/or leaders arrive via reinforcement then all leadership values should be recalced.

OR at least it should! :-/

I've never paid attention to it, but I will the next battle I have (with reinforcements).

It's worked for me.

[DCWhitworth]

ORIGINAL: Jimmer

No, Charles can't make the jump to 18 without penalty, because the table should then be 4 vs 2, which is 0/-1, not +1/0. Since it is expected that Nappy would have cav superiority, that makes it +1/-1 again. In EiANW, though, this is not implemented correctly, so you remain correct. Until Charles puts on the 19th corps ...

Leaders should only rarely drop from 3 to 2, because of this and other table changes.

Marshall: It would be really nice if we could choose to voluntaritly drop a leader's rating. This would be a simple check box, chosen before each round of combat. There are several combat table results for which a player might want to do this.

Who says Napoleon would have cavalry superiority ? I'd think that pretty unlikely against 18 corps, certain not 'expected'.