Jap LBA dive bombers...

Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

FatR
Posts: 2522
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:04 am
Location: St.Petersburg, Russia

RE: Jap LBA dive bombers...

Post by FatR »

This game just doesn't model the advantages of Ki-51 and Ki-36: cheapness, ability to fly from small improvised airfields, easy maintenance, high maneurability at low speed/altitude, and their role as tactical recon and, IIRC, artillery observers. Ki-48 was a flawed plane and the game actually makes it look better than it was, as it is the most common alternative to Ki-51/36.
The Reluctant Admiral mod team.

Take a look at the latest released version of the Reluctant Admiral mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/
Caliban
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:36 am

RE: Jap LBA dive bombers...

Post by Caliban »

Thinking along the lines of Shark7 I was curious as to whether anyone had examined the relationship of bombing by a/c type to terrain type?

Does strafing units which are utilizing railroad movement have any signicant advantages?

Caliban

User avatar
timtom
Posts: 1500
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 9:23 pm
Location: Aarhus, Denmark

RE: Jap LBA dive bombers...

Post by timtom »

ORIGINAL: FatR

This game just doesn't model the advantages of Ki-51 and Ki-36: cheapness, ability to fly from small improvised airfields, easy maintenance, high maneurability at low speed/altitude, and their role as tactical recon and, IIRC, artillery observers. Ki-48 was a flawed plane and the game actually makes it look better than it was, as it is the most common alternative to Ki-51/36.

Having just one engine they are cheaper to build, being light bomber they operate at full capacity from L2 AF's, they have a maintenance value of 1 (lowest), and have they the camera device making them equal to recon types in terms of DL increase. MNV is a non-issue for bombers.
Where's the Any key?

Image
Streptokok
Posts: 159
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 4:02 pm

RE: Jap LBA dive bombers...

Post by Streptokok »

ORIGINAL: timtom
Having just one engine they are cheaper to build, being light bomber they operate at full capacity from L2 AF's...

They dont. They are classified as level bombers in AE and level bombers dont fly from L2 AF fully. AFAIK anything under LVL 4 AF gives level bombers penalty. Not a single level bomber ever flew a mission from L2 AF in my game and they had targets to bomb. 1 engine bombers did fly from L3 but not whole group, but so did 2 engine level bombers.
The only thing that did fly from L2 are LBA dive bombers (small ammount of land based Val's available) and land based Mabels/Kates.
Maybe they should, dont know how its designed but in my game level bombers never flew a mission from L2. Unless of course I had air HQ in that base but that is not the point here....
"No plan survives contact with the enemy."
- Field Marshal Helmuth von Moltke

"Nuts!"
- General Anthony McAuliffe
FatR
Posts: 2522
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:04 am
Location: St.Petersburg, Russia

RE: Jap LBA dive bombers...

Post by FatR »

    No, they are "light bomber capable". There are no separate caterory for light bombers. Theoretically they should be able to fly normally. I missed the fact that they had camera. Well, then Ki-51 has its uses. 
The Reluctant Admiral mod team.

Take a look at the latest released version of the Reluctant Admiral mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/
Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”