North Atlantic '86 vs Med. Game

Gamers can also use this forum to chat about any game related subject, news, rumours etc.

Moderator: maddog986

User avatar
SwampYankee68
Posts: 611
Joined: Wed May 08, 2002 9:37 am
Location: Connecticut, U.S.

Post by SwampYankee68 »

What if I DON'T WANT TO play Harpoon? It's real time, and my gaming time is such that turn based games are better for me. Additionally, I prefer to play againsty other humans. And, the existing engine from UV can be modified. Also, there are other options, such as the engine being used for Fleet Europa, or a new one.
"The only way I got to keep them Tigers busy is to let them shoot holes in me!"
Drongo
Posts: 1391
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2002 1:03 pm
Location: Melb. Oztralia

Post by Drongo »

How about MED '86? Everyone will be happy then (not).:p
Have no fear,
drink more beer.
User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

Post by Raverdave »

Mmmmmmmmmmm Harpoon 4 *Drool*:cool:
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
pad152
Posts: 2835
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2000 8:00 am

Post by pad152 »

I'd like see a modern game using the UV/WiTP engine, maybe including North Alantic 86, Falklands, and the Med. My understanding is 2B3 games only makes WWII era games.

There hasn't been a good modern naval type game sense the orginal Harpoon, and I don't think we'll every see Harpoon IV. The only thing Harpoon II proved was you can't make a game using AutoCAD.;)
svhrg
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2002 9:53 pm
Location: New York, NY

Post by svhrg »

I think it would be a lot easier to use the UV engine on a MED game than adapting it to modern warfare. My vote falls strongly on the MED camp.

R
User avatar
Ross Moorhouse
Posts: 780
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 5:00 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by Ross Moorhouse »

Sorry guys. well off topic so moved to General Forum..
Ross Moorhouse
Image
Project Manager
www.csosimtek.com
Email: rossm@csogroup.org
User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

Post by Raverdave »

I vote med first. How cool will it be to have stukas attacking convoys?:D
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
User avatar
Oleg Mastruko
Posts: 4534
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Oleg Mastruko »

Originally posted by pad152

There hasn't been a good modern naval type game sense the orginal Harpoon, and I don't think we'll every see Harpoon IV. The only thing Harpoon II proved was you can't make a game using AutoCAD.;)
:D Haha... exactly. Call me shallow, but I can't be bothered to play the game that looks THAT ugly.

O.
Beckles
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2002 5:32 pm
Location: Kansas City, MO, USA

Re: One for NA 86

Post by Beckles »

Originally posted by Swamp_Yankee
"Red Storm Rising" and "Red Phoenix" didn't happen, and they are **** good books. I desperately want a turn- based Modern Naval and Air Combat game to play!!!!
Have you tried Avalon Hill's Fifth Fleet computer game? While it is somewhat dated now, it's actually not half bad ...
Beckles
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2002 5:32 pm
Location: Kansas City, MO, USA

Post by Beckles »

I would love to see a modern game based on NA '86 or any other appropriate scenario, much more so than any WW II game, but I understand the reality of the situation is that it probably wouldn't sell enough to be feasible ...
User avatar
SwampYankee68
Posts: 611
Joined: Wed May 08, 2002 9:37 am
Location: Connecticut, U.S.

Post by SwampYankee68 »

I have heard that as Matrix has been working with SimCan, they have the rights to their Modern Naval games, and have some very indeffinate plans to redo them. While I'll play the WWII games, I can't wait for SOMEONE to do a modern turn based game. I bet it would sell better than you think....
"The only way I got to keep them Tigers busy is to let them shoot holes in me!"
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”