Why Does it Seem?

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Titanwarrior89
Posts: 3282
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 4:07 pm
Location: arkansas
Contact:

Why Does it Seem?

Post by Titanwarrior89 »

I am playing the allies(pbem). So why is it that every torpedo fired by my subs thats HITs anything "big"-such as a CA,large Ao, Ak or DD torpedo does not explode. But let it be a PB or something similiar - its a hit and it explodes. Please don't give me that FOG crap.

I hope some jap iron is going to the bottom besides these little Pbs and the such. But its Aug 42 and very little is changing. The allied subs are a joke, you might as well leave them in port instead of taking the losses.

I am sure my Japanese counter part has his own complaints with something being off. So what gives?
"Before Guadalcanal the enemy advanced at his pleasure. After Guadalcanal, he retreated at ours".

"Mama, There's Rabbits in the Garden"
User avatar
khyberbill
Posts: 1941
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:29 pm
Location: new milford, ct

RE: Why Does it Seem?

Post by khyberbill »

Until 1/43 the US sub torpedo dud rate is very high. Reduces in 1/43 and again in 9/43.
"Its a dog eat dog world Sammy and I am wearing Milkbone underwear" -Norm.
User avatar
Shark7
Posts: 7936
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: The Big Nowhere

RE: Why Does it Seem?

Post by Shark7 »

Being one who is on the receiving end of said torpedos...trust me, they do damage to the big ships too.
Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'
User avatar
Gary D
Posts: 169
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 1:43 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Why Does it Seem?

Post by Gary D »

I do not keep track of actual percentages but the allied torps felt fine to me pre patch. Not far along enough post patch to say one way or the other.

Some days I see hit hit hit hit, other days miss dud miss dud.

Being an airedale though, I would be perfectly happy if the Devs issued rubber torpedos to both sides! And tied string of tin cans full of marbles to the back of the sneaky sob's.

All the best,
User avatar
Titanwarrior89
Posts: 3282
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 4:07 pm
Location: arkansas
Contact:

RE: Why Does it Seem?

Post by Titanwarrior89 »

I understand that the dud rate is very high(to high I think) but what bothers me is -that in my game my torpedoes blow on the PBs but against anything else its a dud..... Why is it always the smaller vessels that you get a exploding torpedo. If its the FOW then why not show a Ak or DD once in a while on the replay. This has happened at least dozen plus times. I don't watch the replay if its not a pb or something similiar. I just look at the stats sheet. If its anything large than a PB, I already no the results.
"Before Guadalcanal the enemy advanced at his pleasure. After Guadalcanal, he retreated at ours".

"Mama, There's Rabbits in the Garden"
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Why Does it Seem?

Post by Terminus »

There is no "bias" of any sort, other than the high dud rate of the Mk 14 torpedo. Whether you hit the Yamato or the smallest auxiliary minesweeper is completely without importance.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Titanwarrior89
Posts: 3282
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 4:07 pm
Location: arkansas
Contact:

RE: Why Does it Seem?

Post by Titanwarrior89 »

Is it possiable that you hit a Ak but shows a pb during the replay-due to the fow? I am asking a question, because I am not sure.
ORIGINAL: Terminus

There is no "bias" of any sort, other than the high dud rate of the Mk 14 torpedo. Whether you hit the Yamato or the smallest auxiliary minesweeper is completely without importance.
"Before Guadalcanal the enemy advanced at his pleasure. After Guadalcanal, he retreated at ours".

"Mama, There's Rabbits in the Garden"
User avatar
Titanwarrior89
Posts: 3282
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 4:07 pm
Location: arkansas
Contact:

RE: Why Does it Seem?

Post by Titanwarrior89 »

ORIGINAL: Titanwarrior89

Is it possiable that you hit a Ak but shows a pb during the replay-due to the fow? I am asking a question, because I am not sure. Is there replay bias?
ORIGINAL: Terminus

There is no "bias" of any sort, other than the high dud rate of the Mk 14 torpedo. Whether you hit the Yamato or the smallest auxiliary minesweeper is completely without importance.
"Before Guadalcanal the enemy advanced at his pleasure. After Guadalcanal, he retreated at ours".

"Mama, There's Rabbits in the Garden"
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Why Does it Seem?

Post by Terminus »

There's no "bias" of any sort. FoW can tell you all sorts of things, though, including mistaking an AK for a PB.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Nemo121
Posts: 5838
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 11:15 am
Contact:

RE: Why Does it Seem?

Post by Nemo121 »

Short answer: The game isn treating both sides equally.
 
 
Long answer: Your perception is a result of an egocentric cognitive bias which is common to all people and which, incorrectly, overemphasises one's own experience as a basis for generalisation.
John Dillworth: "I had GreyJoy check my spelling and he said it was fine."
Well, that's that settled then.
User avatar
stuman
Posts: 3945
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 8:59 am
Location: Elvis' Hometown

RE: Why Does it Seem?

Post by stuman »

ORIGINAL: Nemo121

Short answer: The game isn treating both sides equally.


Long answer: Your perception is a result of an egocentric cognitive bias which is common to all people and which, incorrectly, overemphasises one's own experience as a basis for generalisation.

That is a lot of big words.

And I think the game is biased against me. It is constantly blowing up my ships, shooting down my planes, sinking my subs and trashing my troops. All of the time, without letup.
" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley

Image
User avatar
Nemo121
Posts: 5838
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 11:15 am
Contact:

RE: Why Does it Seem?

Post by Nemo121 »

*chuckle* Yeah, what he said [:D]
John Dillworth: "I had GreyJoy check my spelling and he said it was fine."
Well, that's that settled then.
bradfordkay
Posts: 8603
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Olympia, WA

RE: Why Does it Seem?

Post by bradfordkay »

Murphy's Law rules my life.

I recall Chez mentioning a similar complaint in our CHS game. In that game which ended in late Aug '44, we had two IJN CAs sunk by sub, one IJN CL sunk, five DDs,  one IJN BB and one IJN CV hit by sub torpedoes. I lost one CVE, six DDs and three DEs to subs. I don't recall any other capital ships of mine hit by subs.

What I am trying to get at is that in the eyes of the beholder, it never looks as good as you want it to. We had plenty of opportunities to attack larger vessels but the attacks failed. C'est la guerre. I don't think that there is a bias in the game against sub attacks on capital ships, but it sure feels like it when you watch the attacks fail!
fair winds,
Brad
User avatar
Jim D Burns
Posts: 4001
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: Salida, CA.

RE: Why Does it Seem?

Post by Jim D Burns »

ORIGINAL: Titanwarrior89

Is it possiable that you hit a Ak but shows a pb during the replay-due to the fow? I am asking a question, because I am not sure.


You’re in Aug 42, so a lot of the early fighting has been resolved as far as FoW is concerned and the actual ships sunk should now be in the ships sunk list. Sort by weapon type that sunk them and you'll get a good picture of how well the Mk 14 is doing against AKs in your game. Just be aware the last 3 months (I think its 3) can be total crap reporting due to FoW, so ignore those ships until Nov 42 to confirm them.

Jim
User avatar
noguaranteeofsanity
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:28 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

RE: Why Does it Seem?

Post by noguaranteeofsanity »

I have runs of bad luck with the US subs, where every torpedo will fail and then just when you are wondering why you are even watching the combat animations and still paying attention, one will actually work and sink something important, like the Kaga, despite previously failing against every damn destroyer or whatever else they have come across. I think its basically just the luck of the dice and i dont think there is any bias.

Of course, if you want to avoid this, you dont have torpedo problems with the Dutch subs.
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: Why Does it Seem?

Post by Mike Scholl »

ORIGINAL: noguaranteeofsanity

I have runs of bad luck with the US subs, where every torpedo will fail and then just when you are wondering why you are even watching the combat animations and still paying attention, one will actually work and sink something important, like the Kaga, despite previously failing against every damn destroyer or whatever else they have come across. I think its basically just the luck of the dice and i dont think there is any bias.

Of course, if you want to avoid this, you dont have torpedo problems with the Dutch subs. Nor the British or the American S-Boats if the programming is accurate. I've found it best to use the American Fleet Boats for scouting and harrasment and leave the actual interdiction to the subs with working torpedoes.
User avatar
cantona2
Posts: 3749
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 2:45 pm
Location: Gibraltar

RE: Why Does it Seem?

Post by cantona2 »

ORIGINAL: khyberbill

Until 1/43 the US sub torpedo dud rate is very high. Reduces in 1/43 and again in 9/43.

Yes but i agree with the OP. It has happened very often in WitP as well. Plenty of hits and orange on Ak's and such but very little hit and orange on military ships. Ceratinly DD's get a lot of dud hits and everytime I have had a CV in my sights there has always been a dud hit.
1966 was a great year for English Football...Eric was born

vinnie71
Posts: 969
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 7:32 am

RE: Why Does it Seem?

Post by vinnie71 »

Use the large US subs to carry supplies to isolated garrisons and send out the S class boats who do not suffer the same penalties. Their dud rate is much lower...
User avatar
Dixie
Posts: 10303
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 3:14 pm
Location: UK

RE: Why Does it Seem?

Post by Dixie »

I've not sunk, or even damaged, any IJN ships larger than a destroyer in my game.  Mostly because the majority of targets are the transport ships.

It feels like a conspiracy, but that's because you want to sink those warships more than the transports so the duds are more obvious.
[center]Image

Bigger boys stole my sig
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: Why Does it Seem?

Post by HansBolter »

ORIGINAL: cantona2

ORIGINAL: khyberbill

Until 1/43 the US sub torpedo dud rate is very high. Reduces in 1/43 and again in 9/43.

everytime I have had a CV in my sights there has always been a dud hit.


Exactly HOW high? My personal experience, which I am certain I will be reminded by the hair splitters represents an insufficient number of iterations to be an accurate representation, but nonetheless STILL represents my experience, has seen 90%+ dud rates for the Allies while the Japanese sub commanders, unrestricted by historical Japanese Sub Doctrine (conveniently omitted from AE by those same devs who constantly claim there is no Japanese bias) slaughter the Allied transports.

Until I see the devs replace the toggle for Japanese Sub Doctrine in patch 3 , I will not believe their claims that there is no bias nor will I use the setting for Allied dud torpodoes, which my personal experience shows to be excessive.

This is what you get when you turn off the dud rate:



Image


p.s. Turning off the dud rate does not mean no duds at all. It drops the rate to arround 5%. I still get duds with both submarine and air launched torpodoes.
Attachments
KagaKaput.jpg
KagaKaput.jpg (94.14 KiB) Viewed 300 times
Hans

Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”