Royal Thai Army

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
CapAndGown
Posts: 3078
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Virginia, USA

Royal Thai Army

Post by CapAndGown »

I know it is fairly standard practice to have a house rule about paying PP for moving restricted units outside their designated area (Kwantung army unit must remain in Manchuria unless PP are paid). What about the RTA? Should that be allowed outside Thailand under any circumstances? Also, is the Korea Area Army Japanese or Korean?
Andy Mac
Posts: 12578
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Alexandria, Scotland

RE: Royal Thai Army

Post by Andy Mac »

Thais should not leave Thailand.
Marty A
Posts: 213
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:48 am

RE: Royal Thai Army

Post by Marty A »

rta did move outside thailand. most people use 3 hex rule i think.
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: Royal Thai Army

Post by Mike Scholl »

ORIGINAL: Marty A

rta did move outside thailand. most people use 3 hex rule i think.

But not very far..., and only to garrison areas of Burma claimed by the Thais.
Andy Mac
Posts: 12578
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Alexandria, Scotland

RE: Royal Thai Army

Post by Andy Mac »

Personally I wouldnt have a problem with them operating up to about Tavoy in Burma and down to VP

maybe as far as Hanoi in the East but thats about it
User avatar
Feltan
Posts: 1173
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 6:47 am
Location: Kansas

RE: Royal Thai Army

Post by Feltan »

I have no problem with them being used as garrison forces in Burma. On the other hand, to use them as assault troops for an early Burma offensive seems to stretch reality too far.

Regards,
Feltan
Marty A
Posts: 213
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:48 am

RE: Royal Thai Army

Post by Marty A »

ORIGINAL: Andy Mac

Personally I wouldnt have a problem with them operating up to about Tavoy in Burma and down to VP

maybe as far as Hanoi in the East but thats about it

Then why you put in game if not to use? all they good for is garrison. they can not attack or defend except against weak unit. eliminate rta and thailand garrison. less than 5% of people cry over this i think.
Fishbed
Posts: 1827
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:52 am
Location: Henderson Field, Guadalcanal

RE: Royal Thai Army

Post by Fishbed »

Because Thailand has to be able to defend itself if the British come for it...

And don't underestimate the crying-potential of "less than 5% of people" on these boards [;)]
Andy Mac
Posts: 12578
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Alexandria, Scotland

RE: Royal Thai Army

Post by Andy Mac »

Marty the editor is there for you to use please feel free to delete them.
User avatar
Blackhorse
Posts: 1415
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Eastern US

RE: Royal Thai Army

Post by Blackhorse »


Historically, the Thai army only entered the Shan States region of Burma -- an area without bases on the AE map. The Thai forces skirmished with one Chinese Division, and eventually signed an armistice with the Chinese Division Commander (!).

The march into Burma was a political move by the (pro-Japanese) head of the Thai government, to strengthen his shaky hold on the government. It didn't work. As soon as it baecame clear that Japan was not going to win the war, he was overthrown.

FWIW, the Japanese opposed the Thai invasion of Burma - since letting the Thais carve out a piece of Burma complicated the Japanese message that they came to liberate Burma from the British.

IMHO, under no circumstances would the Thai forces have been committed to fight against the British. The Thais had no interest in fighting them along the Rangoon-Mandalay axis when the Japanese were advancing. And by the time the British were strong enough to fight their way into Thailand, the Thai regime would be pro-Allied, and welcome them in.
WitP-AE -- US LCU & AI Stuff

Oddball: Why don't you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don't you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don't you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?
Moriarty: Crap!
User avatar
Shark7
Posts: 7936
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: The Big Nowhere

RE: Royal Thai Army

Post by Shark7 »

If you want to be completely technical, the RTA Phayap (Northern) Army would march into the Shan States of Burma starting May 10, 1942. The problem with this is that none of the Shan States are represented by bases in the game. Their main target was Keng Tung which they occupied before pushing against the Chinese border in 1943. By 1944 they had a cease fire with the Chinese, and by 1945 they were basically out of the Shan States and no longer participating in the war...

That is the quick synopsis of it anyway.
Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'
User avatar
stuman
Posts: 3945
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 8:59 am
Location: Elvis' Hometown

RE: Royal Thai Army

Post by stuman »

ORIGINAL: Shark7

If you want to be completely technical, the RTA Phayap (Northern) Army would march into the Shan States of Burma starting May 10, 1942. The problem with this is that none of the Shan States are represented by bases in the game. Their main target was Keng Tung which they occupied before pushing against the Chinese border in 1943. By 1944 they had a cease fire with the Chinese, and by 1945 they were basically out of the Shan States and no longer participating in the war...

That is the quick synopsis of it anyway.


Hmm, so my plan of using the Thai army to invade Alaska seems to be a tad ahistorical ?
" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley

Image
User avatar
Shark7
Posts: 7936
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: The Big Nowhere

RE: Royal Thai Army

Post by Shark7 »

ORIGINAL: stuman

ORIGINAL: Shark7

If you want to be completely technical, the RTA Phayap (Northern) Army would march into the Shan States of Burma starting May 10, 1942. The problem with this is that none of the Shan States are represented by bases in the game. Their main target was Keng Tung which they occupied before pushing against the Chinese border in 1943. By 1944 they had a cease fire with the Chinese, and by 1945 they were basically out of the Shan States and no longer participating in the war...

That is the quick synopsis of it anyway.


Hmm, so my plan of using the Thai army to invade Alaska seems to be a tad ahistorical ?

Oh you know, just a little... [:D]
Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'
Marty A
Posts: 213
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:48 am

RE: Royal Thai Army

Post by Marty A »

ORIGINAL: Andy Mac

Marty the editor is there for you to use please feel free to delete them.

i use 3 hex rule. i ask YOU why YOU do not delete if YOU do not think they should be in there. why you ask me do delete?
Andy Mac
Posts: 12578
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Alexandria, Scotland

RE: Royal Thai Army

Post by Andy Mac »

Because it doesnt bug me at all that the Thais are in the game if for no other reason than to stop gamey para attacks by Allied forces and even a modicum of sense by players you seemed all hot and bothered about it so theres the editor feel free to delete them for your own games I am happy with them being in
User avatar
JWE
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:02 pm

RE: Royal Thai Army

Post by JWE »

ORIGINAL: Marty A
i use 3 hex rule. i ask YOU why YOU do not delete if YOU do not think they should be in there. why you ask me do delete?
Because AndyMac is defining a game for more people than just YOU. If YOU have an issue with things, then YOU can change them.

The editor is there for YOU to change things to conform with YOUR view of reality. YOU are not the only player we have to accommodate.
romanovich
Posts: 126
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 8:51 am
Location: SoCal

RE: Royal Thai Army

Post by romanovich »

I don't particularly like YOU telling Andy to delete something I like about this game. The rich detail is neat, and I like playing a GAME (which implies possible variances to the historical outcomes from the scenarios modeled), as opposed to running reinactments of known (and boring) historical outcomes. Dumb down your AE all you want; leave the great AE to people who appreciate how to best use it.
User avatar
oldman45
Posts: 2325
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 4:15 am
Location: Jacksonville Fl

RE: Royal Thai Army

Post by oldman45 »

You need to keep the RTA in so the RIA/RAF/10th AF has something to bomb [8D]
User avatar
Shark7
Posts: 7936
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: The Big Nowhere

RE: Royal Thai Army

Post by Shark7 »

ORIGINAL: romanovich

I don't particularly like YOU telling Andy to delete something I like about this game. The rich detail is neat, and I like playing a GAME (which implies possible variances to the historical outcomes from the scenarios modeled), as opposed to running reinactments of known (and boring) historical outcomes. Dumb down your AE all you want; leave the great AE to people who appreciate how to best use it.

TBH, I made a mod that added in the rest of the RTA, the RTAF, and the RTN, then put in the cities of the Shan States to invade with all those extra units. Not every player wants just the vanilla, hence the editor.

PS: Hawk II and Hawk III squadrons versus the AVG = very bad slaughter of the old biplanes. [X(]
Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'
User avatar
oldman45
Posts: 2325
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 4:15 am
Location: Jacksonville Fl

RE: Royal Thai Army

Post by oldman45 »

ORIGINAL: Shark7

TBH, I made a mod that added in the rest of the RTA, the RTAF, and the RTN, then put in the cities of the Shan States to invade with all those extra units. Not every player wants just the vanilla, hence the editor.

PS: Hawk II and Hawk III squadrons versus the AVG = very bad slaughter of the old biplanes. [X(]

I am surprised the Japs didn't give them any of their Claudes or Nates.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”