WitPTracker AE Release 1.11 Available!

[rjopel]

ORIGINAL: floydg

ORIGINAL: rjopel

Is there anyway to filter out the old devices? The ones with the 99/99 avail dates?

Anything is possible. Would it be better to filter out stuff with a pool amount of 0, instead (or some other criteria)?

You could add additional sorts. Pool and Active at 0 is an option but then you can't look to see what's in the pipeline.

The 99/99 are legacy devices from WITP and I believe none are used in the current games.

[floydg]

ORIGINAL: floydg

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

Here is my list of "data sets" - you could make a case to move some around, but this is logical, IMO. [:)]

1) Alerts
2) Bases
3) Devices
4) Industry
5) Resources
6) Leaders
7) LCU Production
8) LCUs
9) Air Production
10) Aircraft
11) Aircraft Comparison
12) Air Groups & Pilots
13) Ship Production
14) Ships
15) Ship Classes
16) Ship Upgrade
17) Ship Repairs
18) Task forces
19) Minefields
20) Intel
21) Map
22) Victory Points
23) Summary

Sounds good to me. Certainly an improvement over the present.

Thanks!

Done. I swapped 7 and 8, 9 and 10, 13 and 14; but otherwise, it's as you stated.

Floyd

[floydg]

ORIGINAL: floydg

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

So you're looking for a torpedo "rating" in the Ships panel, like ASW and AA?

YES!

Okay, easy to add.

Should it be just the number of torpedoes or the # times ammo? For example, Yubari class CL has 4 Type 93's with an ammo of 2. Should the rating be "4" or "8"?

[n01487477]

ORIGINAL: floydg

ORIGINAL: floydg

ORIGINAL: ny59giants



YES!

Okay, easy to add.

Should it be just the number of torpedoes or the # times ammo? For example, Yubari class CL has 4 Type 93's with an ammo of 2. Should the rating be "4" or "8"?

From what I've read (anecdotal evidence), It seems that SS at least fire a full spread at a target, so the number of mounts seem paramount ... so I'd say 4 ... others opinions ?

[Chris21wen]

There's a problem with the Portland USA and the region it is assigned too. In all the region definition files it is shown assigned to the Continental US yet when you look in the industry data set it is shown as being in Australia. I've reassigned it in the Base data set but it still says it's in Australia.

[n01487477]

ORIGINAL: Chris H
There's a problem with the Portland USA and the region it is assigned too. In all the region definition files it is shown assigned to the Continental US yet when you look in the industry data set it is shown as being in Australia. I've reassigned it in the Base data set but it still says it's in Australia.

Which region definition file are you using Nomad's or Kulls ? Although you shouldn't need to have, did you shut down and tried to restart Tracker ? Which Industry screen is showing the region as Oz ?

[Nomad]

There is a Portland USA and a Portland Aus.

[n01487477]

Another dumb post by me [;)] I didn't even read the location ... [:(]

[floydg]

[EDIT] mistake deleted. [;)]

[n01487477]

ORIGINAL: floydg
But you do need to quit and restart WitPTracker to get the region grouping in the Industry panel to refresh.

Not when I do it [8D], Just go to another tab (in the production area) and then back, and it's right (or so I believe) ...

Do I need to take another look at it ?

[floydg]

ORIGINAL: n01487477

ORIGINAL: floydg
But you do need to quit and restart WitPTracker to get the region grouping in the Industry panel to refresh.

Not when I do it [8D], Just go to another tab (in the production area) and then back, and it's right (or so I believe) ...

Do I need to take another look at it ?

Oops. Never mind - just checked the code.

[n01487477]

Got the Assault Strength at base and Garrison requirement working (mostly) - I have to hide the garrison req. for bases yet captured ...

Unfortunately, the savefile doesn't give the exact AS value, so this is from our calculated AS (hence approx +/- 1 / lcu at base).

[witpqs]

ORIGINAL: n01487477

Got the Assault Strength at base and Garrison requirement working (mostly) - I have to hide the garrison req. for bases yet captured ...

Unfortunately, the savefile doesn't give the exact AS value, so this is from our calculated AS (hence approx +/- 1 / lcu at base).

Maybe not - this is not a FOW item. Someone who wants to can just look this up in the database, right?

[jhdeerslayer]

Any idea what might cause this error? I have Tracker working great on my XP machine but my Vista gives this error. Thanks for Tracker and any help. I have Java Build 17.

[floydg]

ORIGINAL: Deerslayer

Any idea what might cause this error? I have Tracker working great on my XP machine but my Vista gives this error. Thanks for Tracker and any help. I have Java Build 17.

If the witptracker.properties file has a blank line at the end, it could cause this problem.

[jhdeerslayer]

That was it sir in spite of me thinking I had been careful. Thanks.

[floydg]

ORIGINAL: Deerslayer

That was it sir in spite of me thinking I had been careful. Thanks.

I need to make it less sensitive to these types of "errors".

[JamesM]

I am getting this error message how to get this utility to work. I have tried different configurations and installed the latest versions of Java.






Also I have tried the using the cmd.exe in the sysWOW64 folder and manually type the command line in the bat file.

[n01487477]

JamesM,

Point 4 of the installation guide should be looked at.
http://sites.google.com/site/witptracker/installation

This is not a Java problem, but a MS thing ...

[JamesM]

ORIGINAL: n01487477

JamesM,

Point 4 of the installation guide should be looked at.
http://sites.google.com/site/witptracker/installation

This is not a Java problem, but a MS thing ...

Thank you for the advice but I cannot get it to work.