ASW aircraft arming

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
FAdmiral
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: Atlanta,GA, USA

ASW aircraft arming

Post by FAdmiral »

I see a big flaw with what I can arm the ASW planes going out on patrol.
Torpedos would be fairly useless and bombs would have been my second choice.
My first & formost weapon would be DEPTH CHARGES which
I would tend to think they really had back in the WW2 days. Most subs caught by
aircraft would be diving or at PD (shadow or Per wake) so the DC would be the
best weapon of choice. Bombs would be OK only if the sub stayed up and fought
the plane off with its AA weapon(s) Not too many skippers did that I'll bet !!!!

JIM
Ghertz
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:30 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

RE: ASW aircraft arming

Post by Ghertz »

I don't know which of depth charges, bombs, or torpedoes was preferred, but all three were available for Catalinas:
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBY_Catalina
 
Armament:
 
[*]3× .30 cal (7.62 mm) machine guns (two in nose turret, one in ventral hatch at tail)
[*]2× .50 cal (12.7 mm) machine guns (one in each waist blister)
[*]4,000 lb (1,814 kg) of bombs or depth charges, torpedo racks were also available
Ghertz
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:30 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

RE: ASW aircraft arming

Post by Ghertz »

Also, depth charges seem to be in short supply for both sides
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: ASW aircraft arming

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: FAdmiral

I see a big flaw with what I can arm the ASW planes going out on patrol.
Torpedos would be fairly useless and bombs would have been my second choice.
My first & formost weapon would be DEPTH CHARGES which
I would tend to think they really had back in the WW2 days. Most subs caught by
aircraft would be diving or at PD (shadow or Per wake) so the DC would be the
best weapon of choice. Bombs would be OK only if the sub stayed up and fought
the plane off with its AA weapon(s) Not too many skippers did that I'll bet !!!!

JIM


aircraft on nav search or ASW don´t use depth charges but the reduced loadoat of the ac which always are bombs. So a PBY drops a couple of bombs on a sub if attacking. No matter if you call it bomb or DC if the Cat hits the enemy sub it´s got a problem. The bombs work, if you would see PBY attacking with DC it would not be different than PBY attacking with bomb. Would only add some chrome.
herwin
Posts: 6047
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 9:20 pm
Location: Sunderland, UK
Contact:

RE: ASW aircraft arming

Post by herwin »

ORIGINAL: FAdmiral

I see a big flaw with what I can arm the ASW planes going out on patrol.
Torpedos would be fairly useless and bombs would have been my second choice.
My first & formost weapon would be DEPTH CHARGES which
I would tend to think they really had back in the WW2 days. Most subs caught by
aircraft would be diving or at PD (shadow or Per wake) so the DC would be the
best weapon of choice. Bombs would be OK only if the sub stayed up and fought
the plane off with its AA weapon(s) Not too many skippers did that I'll bet !!!!

JIM

You're correct. This is discussed in Methods of Operations Research. They even discuss the period when German subs were staying up and fighting the plane off with AA.
Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”