Japanese industry

Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Ametysth
Posts: 74
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:21 pm

RE: Japanese industry

Post by Ametysth »

ORIGINAL: findmeifyoucan

That's nice but what is the point in advancing the engine if you can't advance the plane? I am starting to think on agreeing with the previous comment that putting resources into research is a waste and to just put those resources into producing more planes. Like the Russians WWII philosophy, quantity rather than quality. :-)

Manual states that engines and planes are researched in same manner. That means that if you manage to build same 85 points of some plane type in multiple factories, none too big, you should start to advance that model rather quickly.

Problem is that aircraft factories repair is far slower than engine factories. Rate of repair is actually so slow, that in plane models in service aprox. mid 1943, there is no advance or it is so small that it doesn't matter. IMHO it is better to concentrate on few high-end models from 1945 or end of 1944 and push them forward. From 1943 forward they should start advancing rather quickly, if effort to research them is made from day one.
User avatar
Mynok
Posts: 12108
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 12:12 am
Contact:

RE: Japanese industry

Post by Mynok »


Well...the key is whether the devs removed the 3 month restriction from research advances that existed in Witp. In 44 and 45, the US becomes a signatory to the Russian doctrine of  'Quantity has a quality all its own'.
"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown
User avatar
n01487477
Posts: 4764
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 12:00 am

RE: Japanese industry

Post by n01487477 »

ORIGINAL: Mynok


Well...the key is whether the devs removed the 3 month restriction from research advances that existed in Witp. In 44 and 45, the US becomes a signatory to the Russian doctrine of  'Quantity has a quality all its own'.
There was never a restriction in witp, I've got planes much earlier ... believe me [8D]
User avatar
Mynok
Posts: 12108
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 12:12 am
Contact:

RE: Japanese industry

Post by Mynok »


There was, but damned if I'm gonna go search through the Witp forums to find that post.
"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10938
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Japanese industry

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: n01487477

ORIGINAL: Mynok


Well...the key is whether the devs removed the 3 month restriction from research advances that existed in Witp. In 44 and 45, the US becomes a signatory to the Russian doctrine of  'Quantity has a quality all its own'.
There was never a restriction in witp, I've got planes much earlier ... believe me [8D]

I confirm. By Dec 15, I've already repaired 3 1944 R&D factories. Since two of those are 1 unit factories, they are already producing R&D points. Granted, not much R&D, but it is a start.
Pax
xj900uk
Posts: 1345
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:26 pm

RE: Japanese industry

Post by xj900uk »

If you don't R&D a new model or type, will it never appear?  There seem to be loads of possible models out there to choose from (some crap I agree) and only a limited amount of factories to R&D them.  I understand how to icnrease the size of the factories (keep 'em small to begin with) but do you get any more in future months/years after Dec '41 for other models?
erstad
Posts: 1953
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 11:40 pm
Location: Midwest USA

RE: Japanese industry

Post by erstad »

ORIGINAL: xj900uk

If you don't R&D a new model or type, will it never appear?  There seem to be loads of possible models out there to choose from (some crap I agree) and only a limited amount of factories to R&D them.  I understand how to icnrease the size of the factories (keep 'em small to begin with) but do you get any more in future months/years after Dec '41 for other models?

You get them on the scheduled date without any R&D effort.

Depending on the plane and what factories upgrade to it, you might have a lot, a few, or no factories producing the plane when it is available but the availability date will never be later than indicated.
xj900uk
Posts: 1345
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:26 pm

RE: Japanese industry

Post by xj900uk »

Thanks, so you're saying that new models/variants will appear on the scheduled date without any deviation.  That is very useful t o know as there are several planes I wouldn't mind appearing earlier (if I were playing the Japanese) but others I would still like to have around but don't really have the time to devote any spare R&D to
I always wonder what woudl have happened if the better Japanese aircraft, like the Jill, George, Frank and Sam were availalbe earlier, whilst there were still a few good trained pilots around to fly them and utilise their excellent capabilities
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10938
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Japanese industry

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: xj900uk

Thanks, so you're saying that new models/variants will appear on the scheduled date without any deviation.  That is very useful t o know as there are several planes I wouldn't mind appearing earlier (if I were playing the Japanese) but others I would still like to have around but don't really have the time to devote any spare R&D to
I always wonder what woudl have happened if the better Japanese aircraft, like the Jill, George, Frank and Sam were availalbe earlier, whilst there were still a few good trained pilots around to fly them and utilise their excellent capabilities
So do many other JFB's. [:D]
Pax
xj900uk
Posts: 1345
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:26 pm

RE: Japanese industry

Post by xj900uk »

Interestingly, after the war in 46-47 a sole A7M Sam (or Reppu) was test-flown in the US and pitched in mock battle against the top US planes (like the P51, F4U and F8 Bearcat which was just starting to come in).  The A7M won each time especially at high altitude...
Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”