Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
ORIGINAL: Mynok
Hey, I've never lived outside the south and I HATE summer here. You can always put more on. When you are buck naked and sweating like drunk john on a cheap whore, it's just wrong.
[:D]
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
Well, I could have said misidentified, pilloried, branded or tatooed. I guess those would have been better choices...
ORIGINAL: John 3rd
There. Did I demonstrate the ability to take offense to the hijacked subject of a Thread that was REALLY cool while at the same time interjecting politics so the Thread might get locked? Does that get to count as one on the list?
ORIGINAL: Nemo121
The reality is that while you've characterised various forms of commentary response to your myriad complaints rather well it doesn't in any way show that there's more validity to your initial complaints than to their ripostes. I see more and more why so many devs got burned out in these fora and left.
ORIGINAL: Kwik E Mart
ORIGINAL: ckammp
ORIGINAL: Mark Weston
Perhaps a lot of the sceptical responses are generated by the tone the Disputer uses as much as the content of his observations.
Another possibility is his tendency to think (or write as though he thinks) that the single data point of his one PBeM game is enough basis for making definitive conclusions about the state of WitP:AE.
100% agree.
Canoerebel refuses to accept any suggestion that the combination of his tactics and strategy, his opponents's tactics and strategies, and game mechanics WAD won't always add up to favorable combat results. Instead, he blames the game for his losses, loudly claiming to have found a "genuine anomaly that needs to be addressed". The complete lack of corroborating evidence from other players doesn't faze him; he dismisses all those who disagree as "complainers" who "don't like him", as he continues to post his daily episodes of "Whine in the Pacific: Angst Edition".
Canoerebel, you have beaten this "dead horse" so much it's bones have been ground into dust. Could you please just stop the constant complaining?
wow...was that on que or what? [X(]
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
Yeah, we have a couple of inches here in Rome (Georgia). But the roads are fine.
ORIGINAL: Buck Beach
ORIGINAL: Kwik E Mart
ORIGINAL: ckammp
100% agree.
Canoerebel refuses to accept any suggestion that the combination of his tactics and strategy, his opponents's tactics and strategies, and game mechanics WAD won't always add up to favorable combat results. Instead, he blames the game for his losses, loudly claiming to have found a "genuine anomaly that needs to be addressed". The complete lack of corroborating evidence from other players doesn't faze him; he dismisses all those who disagree as "complainers" who "don't like him", as he continues to post his daily episodes of "Whine in the Pacific: Angst Edition".
Canoerebel, you have beaten this "dead horse" so much it's bones have been ground into dust. Could you please just stop the constant complaining?
wow...was that on que or what? [X(]
Have to be careful Canoerebel with these replies lest you be drawn into a trap to get you band from the forum.
There seem to be many more people who think you are spot on with your post.
Buck
Question is, has anybody experienced similar results to Canoerebel? This is important because there has to be a definitive pattern.
ORIGINAL: wwengr
Question is, has anybody experienced similar results to Canoerebel? This is important because there has to be a definitive pattern.
ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl
[Yes. I suffered the loss of 5 ASW group DD's off Oahu during the first two weeks of game time. Didn't matter that there was aircraft ASW support in all the hexes and the subs were spotted continuously..., or that the only TF's I sent out were ASW TF's. Used to be that such actions would push the Japanese into spreading out or moving to less-protected areas. This time my opponent didn't even seem to bother to move his subs at all. It's been absurd.
ORIGINAL: Shark7
I'm getting the feeling that the majority of us that are responding in this post are doing the same as Canoerebel, simply blowing off steam through humor. This thread has been a nice change except for the one or two that take every thing serious or lack a sense of humor.
Now then, to more serious matters...no one has yet answered the question, Cheddar or Swiss? [:D]
ORIGINAL: wwengr
ORIGINAL: Shark7
I'm getting the feeling that the majority of us that are responding in this post are doing the same as Canoerebel, simply blowing off steam through humor. This thread has been a nice change except for the one or two that take every thing serious or lack a sense of humor.
Now then, to more serious matters...no one has yet answered the question, Cheddar or Swiss? [:D]
I am deeply concerned about the serious lack of irony in some of these replies. I want a call to action here! We must all be firm and demand only the most serious sense of irony when writing replies.[;)]
ORIGINAL: wwengr
I am deeply concerned about the serious lack of irony in some of these replies. I want a call to action here! We must all be firm and demand only the most serious sense of irony when writing replies.[;)]
ORIGINAL: Nemo121
Canoerebel, perhaps but this is also pretty much the same argument you make about those responding to you when posting putative bug reports in a serious manner.
