Guadalcanal Scenario Glitch

[Lifer]

Several of us have noticed that our Allied SCs are not replenishing their Mk20 Mousetrap devices.

I am also wondering about the payment of PPs for the Allied side. Units going from Australia Command to SWPac pay a reduced cost for the transfer while units from SoPac Rear to SoPac pay full PP cost. I know that the PP cost and lack of supplies/fuel is part of the scenario and is what makes this one fun and challenging. Just wondering if this part (different PP costs) is by design.

Greg

[Reverberate]

What he said.

And subs won't re-torp even with a sub tender in the port.

[sabreman1966mcs]

ORIGINAL: Lifer

Several of us have noticed that our Allied SCs are not replenishing their Mk20 Mousetrap devices.

I am also wondering about the payment of PPs for the Allied side. Units going from Australia Command to SWPac pay a reduced cost for the transfer while units from SoPac Rear to SoPac pay full PP cost. I know that the PP cost and lack of supplies/fuel is part of the scenario and is what makes this one fun and challenging. Just wondering if this part (different PP costs) is by design.

Greg

Also what is the correct scenario end date, the Scenario screen says 7th Feb 43 but the Preferences and options screen in the scenario says 2nd April 43

[Lifer]

Reverberate
Not having an issue with subs.  Mine replenish at Noumea without a tender and Brisbane with a tender.  I've even sent the tender to Townesville and have been able to reload.  You've got the AS loaded with supply and everyone has Operation Points remaining?

Greg