Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21, elmo3
ORIGINAL: Helpless
... For example, very significant Soviet resource centers and HI are located in the South (Ukraine). They significant amount of HI is located there as well. So for long term perspective it pays off to go South quickly not to the North.
...
The Russians have a lot of HI located in the South Ukraine - does the AI relocate this HI further East as the Germans advance?
ORIGINAL: elmo3
ORIGINAL: Helpless
... For example, very significant Soviet resource centers and HI are located in the South (Ukraine). They significant amount of HI is located there as well. So for long term perspective it pays off to go South quickly not to the North.
...
Now you tell me! [;)]
ORIGINAL: jaw
ORIGINAL: elmo3
ORIGINAL: Helpless
... For example, very significant Soviet resource centers and HI are located in the South (Ukraine). They significant amount of HI is located there as well. So for long term perspective it pays off to go South quickly not to the North.
...
Now you tell me! [;)]
Pavel is of course speaking from a war economy perspective. The victory conditions that are ultimately decided upon may still weight objectives like Moscow and Leningrad very heavily. From a military perspective, Moscow will always be the Soviet Achilles' heel. Take Moscow and you split the Red Army in two in terms of lines of communication; very hard to recover from such a situation.
Another example could be Caucasus where most of the oil/fuel sources are. Cutting them off can make tremendous impact on Soviet offensive abilities
As mentioned all economy factors come into play in long term perspective
ORIGINAL: Helpless
The Russians have a lot of HI located in the South Ukraine - does the AI relocate this HI further East as the Germans advance?
Yes it does.
with armoured spearheads and 'capture' or destroy SOV IND assets before they can evacuate further East??ORIGINAL: Platypus
On the subject of military-industrial complexes close to the Wesern border areas - how much time does the Soviet player need to uplift his/her HI from these forward areas and transport them back to safer areas.
Fo example - Can the GER player 'Rush-in'
cheers
...HI is feed by resources and generating supplies at the end. Supply is then drives all further economy...
Yes, German can capture resource and oil centers. Other factory types got damaged/destroyed. (Need to check if it is permanent). This eventually could lead to some higher output, but not much.Since the growth of HI is limited.
ORIGINAL: ComradeP
Can you "dump" the factories wherever you want along the rail line, or will they automatically move/can they only be moved to the Ural region?
ORIGINAL: Balou
From my understanding, in case the Axis captures more resource centers than their industry with it's limited growth rate can handle, any surplus is simply for the benefit of doing harm to the Soviets.
Question 1: What happens to a damaged resource or oil center ? Both sides were using a "torched earth" policy to some degree (eg oilfields at Grozny). If recovery times get very long, a defender might rather give up an untenable center knowing it is of no use to the enemy in the near or even far future.
Question 2. Factories: some factories were even running with the enemy "in the same hex" (eg Stalingrad). Does this happen in WitE ?
Btw, the main reason I am asking is I slowly get "worried" watching elmo's AAR and the AIs stiff resistence. Whether it is accurate or not it can happen with the current game engine settings. This is why I try to figure out what else can be done and how that would work.
Factories must be located in cities but you can move them to any friendly city on the map although the further east the better.
ORIGINAL: jaw
ORIGINAL: Platypus
On the subject of military-industrial complexes close to the Wesern border areas - how much time does the Soviet player need to uplift his/her HI from these forward areas and transport them back to safer areas.
Fo example - Can the GER player 'Rush-in'
cheers
Against a human Axis player the Russian player will almost certainly loose Minsk on the first turn before he has a chance to evacuate anything but after that he has the capability to evacuate faster than the Axis advances. The problem is he has other demands on rail capacity beyond moving factories. The Soviet Union is a very big place and to get his combat forces into position to block the Axis advance he has to use his rail roads. Even his tank and motorized divisions will require rail road movement if they're coming from deep in the rear and normal movement of any substantial distance will cause a lot of tanks to breakdown. In short, factory evacuation is a balancing act between the operational needs of the moment and the strategic needs of the long term.
ORIGINAL: Platypus
Does the GER player have any option to develop a strategic bomber arm that could interdict transport infrastructure??
This would fall into the "What-If" basket, however, does the game provide an option like this??
thanks for the prompt answers too..
ORIGINAL: ComradeP
Why is further east better? Safer, maybe, but wouldn't the factories be more useful closer to the front, or is there no delay in equipment arrivals regardless of how far the factories are from the front?
Also: I'm guessing that rail transport costs increase with distance travelled, so it might not be a too bad idea to concentrate factories between the front and the Urals, as if more hexes travelled by rail increases the cost on rail transport, you could move more factories/turn if you'd place them west of the Urals.
ORIGINAL: Platypus
Does the GER player have any option to develop a strategic bomber arm that could interdict transport infrastructure??
This would fall into the "What-If" basket, however, does the game provide an option like this??
thanks for the prompt answers too..
ORIGINAL: jaw
ORIGINAL: ComradeP
Why is further east better? Safer, maybe, but wouldn't the factories be more useful closer to the front, or is there no delay in equipment arrivals regardless of how far the factories are from the front?
Also: I'm guessing that rail transport costs increase with distance travelled, so it might not be a too bad idea to concentrate factories between the front and the Urals, as if more hexes travelled by rail increases the cost on rail transport, you could move more factories/turn if you'd place them west of the Urals.
There is no relationship between the location of a factory and the output of production since everything produced goes into one big abstact pool. When you re-locate a factory you want to re-locate it to some place where it will never have to be moved again so the further from the front lines the better.
The rail transport cost is based on the size of the thing your moving not the distance. A normal unit has a maximum rail move of 100 hexes but I'm not sure that is true for factories also. I'll have to note that the next time I move one in the current game I'm testing as the Russian and get back to you.
ORIGINAL: Platypus
After uplifting factories, can the SOV player then move them right up to the Eastern edge of the map - or can they be moved even further East - off-map and out of reach?
And what are the Victory conditions for the GER player -- are they based upon territory held, ie, if GER hold everything west of the line X = longitude, or is it specific cities, or even a combination of cities & resource centres such as oilfields around Baku/Maikop.
cheers
ORIGINAL: elmo3
You pick a city on the map for the factory destination. Victory conditions for the campaigns are not in place yet.
