Attn: Japanese Economics Ministers

Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
CapAndGown
Posts: 3078
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Virginia, USA

RE: Attn: Japanese Economics Ministers

Post by CapAndGown »

Do not build light industry anywhere. The return on investment is very very poor. Building HI down in the SRA, however, such as at Singapore, Batavia, Soerebaja, is pretty standard. Not only do you need HI points for almost everything from ships to engines to vehicles, but HI delivers twice the supply as LI for the same investment of supply. HI pays back in supply in 500 days for every point repaired. LI take 1000 days to pay back this investment.
User avatar
Zeta16
Posts: 1178
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 6:35 am
Location: Columbus. Ohio

RE: Attn: Japanese Economics Ministers

Post by Zeta16 »

Note I am no expert, but I am in 10/43. I coverted as many xAK's as I could, not sure how many maybe 50 at the most. I run from the Northern Home Island, Port Arthur to Home Island, China to Home Island. In the SRA I take stuff to Singapore then to Hong Kong then home. Fuel bulids up so quickly at Palembang, I have 300k to 400k of tonage a month moving fuel out but can not keep up because of port size, oil from there once a month b/c it never really bulids up to much. Really oil never bulids up as much as fuel any where. Burma gets some out but not a lot and the Bureno bases do as well. I try to move as much resources back as can b/c you use more than you think. Overall at the momnent producing what I want and have a HI reserve of 350k, want to get that to 500k or more by mid 44.
"Ours was the first revolution in the history of mankind that truly reversed the course of government, and with three little words: 'We the people.' 'We the people' tell the government what to do, it doesn't tell us." -Ronald Reagan
Mark Weston
Posts: 188
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 8:16 pm

RE: Attn: Japanese Economics Ministers

Post by Mark Weston »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

C/M/K

I'll now use just Pt. Arthur, Shanghai and Fusan.  Fusan and Shanghai are good per the spreadsheet.  I think the Yusan N class is good for Pt. Arthur to haul the resources and oil to Honshu.

Does it make sense to be shipping Oil out of Manchuria? The local refinery capacity will run down the local oil stocks and in 540 days Manchuria will be in oil deficit. The result will be a fairly safe fuel stockpile that you can draw down once there are no other options. I don't see any real advantages to moving the stuff to Japan to be refined.
erstad
Posts: 1953
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 11:40 pm
Location: Midwest USA

RE: Attn: Japanese Economics Ministers

Post by erstad »

ORIGINAL: Mark Weston

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

C/M/K

I'll now use just Pt. Arthur, Shanghai and Fusan.  Fusan and Shanghai are good per the spreadsheet.  I think the Yusan N class is good for Pt. Arthur to haul the resources and oil to Honshu.

Does it make sense to be shipping Oil out of Manchuria? The local refinery capacity will run down the local oil stocks and in 540 days Manchuria will be in oil deficit. The result will be a fairly safe fuel stockpile that you can draw down once there are no other options. I don't see any real advantages to moving the stuff to Japan to be refined.

I don't ship any oil out of Manchuria. The neat thing is that not only does it refine locally but you can use it to refuel ships pulling resources off the mainland so it never actually needs to get shipped anywhere.
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16376
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Attn: Japanese Economics Ministers

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: Mark Weston

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

C/M/K

I'll now use just Pt. Arthur, Shanghai and Fusan.  Fusan and Shanghai are good per the spreadsheet.  I think the Yusan N class is good for Pt. Arthur to haul the resources and oil to Honshu.

Does it make sense to be shipping Oil out of Manchuria? The local refinery capacity will run down the local oil stocks and in 540 days Manchuria will be in oil deficit. The result will be a fairly safe fuel stockpile that you can draw down once there are no other options. I don't see any real advantages to moving the stuff to Japan to be refined.

I keep flipping my thoughts on this one. So far, I've pulled out very little oil. I guess the main reason I consider doing it is to get more fuel in Honshu for the future.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Kitakami
Posts: 1318
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 11:08 pm
Location: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami

RE: Attn: Japanese Economics Ministers

Post by Kitakami »

Mike,

Wouldn't it be better to leave that oil in Manchukuo, and maybe expand Manchurian heavy industry a little?
Tenno Heika Banzai!
User avatar
pompack
Posts: 2585
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 1:44 am
Location: University Park, Texas

RE: Attn: Japanese Economics Ministers

Post by pompack »

Delete:

Bad logic

Sorry, but I am recovering from some dental surgery today and my thought processes are even more incoherent than usual [>:]
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16376
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Attn: Japanese Economics Ministers

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: Kitakami

Mike,

Wouldn't it be better to leave that oil in Manchukuo, and maybe expand Manchurian heavy industry a little?

It might Kitakami. I'm beginning to believe that a modest expansion of HI might be worthwhile (and even necessary) to keep the pilot flow going. I'm out of town on business so I don't have access to the game. I do have my notes though. I'll take a look at it tonight. It'll give me something to do. [:D]
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
CapAndGown
Posts: 3078
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Virginia, USA

RE: Attn: Japanese Economics Ministers

Post by CapAndGown »

Only build HI in the SRA. Period.
User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7712
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

RE: Attn: Japanese Economics Ministers

Post by Q-Ball »

ORIGINAL: cap_and_gown

Only build HI in the SRA. Period.

I would take it one step further and say only expand in SINGAPORE, period. You wont' have to ship any resources to it, and all the fuel you need is in Palembang, or maybe even shipped overland from Burma. No reason to make it hard on yourself by having to ship all that to the Home Islands.

You might say "but what if you lose Sinagpore", but if you lose Sinagpore, you're toast anyway. The only spot that is safer from Bombers is maybe Soerbaya, but that requires resources to be shipped in. (Not enough on Java)

So, I would ONLY expand HI in Singapore, PERIOD.
User avatar
CapAndGown
Posts: 3078
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Virginia, USA

RE: Attn: Japanese Economics Ministers

Post by CapAndGown »

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball

ORIGINAL: cap_and_gown

Only build HI in the SRA. Period.

I would take it one step further and say only expand in SINGAPORE, period. You wont' have to ship any resources to it, and all the fuel you need is in Palembang, or maybe even shipped overland from Burma. No reason to make it hard on yourself by having to ship all that to the Home Islands.

You might say "but what if you lose Sinagpore", but if you lose Sinagpore, you're toast anyway. The only spot that is safer from Bombers is maybe Soerbaya, but that requires resources to be shipped in. (Not enough on Java)

So, I would ONLY expand HI in Singapore, PERIOD.

I am going to disagree here. A) Java makes fuel. B) Java has lots of resources. C) There a lot of resource centers on bases scattered about Java. There are more than enough resources and fuel right around Java to make it useful as a HI center. I am also looking at Java as a hub for resource convoys.
Mark Weston
Posts: 188
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 8:16 pm

RE: Attn: Japanese Economics Ministers

Post by Mark Weston »

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball

I would take it one step further and say only expand in SINGAPORE, period. You wont' have to ship any resources to it, and all the fuel you need is in Palembang, or maybe even shipped overland from Burma. No reason to make it hard on yourself by having to ship all that to the Home Islands.

You might say "but what if you lose Sinagpore", but if you lose Sinagpore, you're toast anyway. The only spot that is safer from Bombers is maybe Soerbaya, but that requires resources to be shipped in. (Not enough on Java)

So, I would ONLY expand HI in Singapore, PERIOD.

Well surely there's a practical problem with that. Say that I decide I need another 1000 HI per day (and a 7% increase doesn't seem huge). That means building 500 HI factories in Singapore and then waiting as they repair at 1 per turn for the next year and a half...

Maximising the ROI on my new factories really requires that they get built as quickly as possible. So I think that means building them at more than one location.
User avatar
Mynok
Posts: 12108
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 12:12 am
Contact:

RE: Attn: Japanese Economics Ministers

Post by Mynok »


Yep. Far better to expand every HI center by 7% than hugely expand just one.
"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown
User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7712
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

RE: Attn: Japanese Economics Ministers

Post by Q-Ball »

Good point on the rate of expansion; I guess I amend that. Still Singapore and Java are the best bets for expansion (the other choices really being Manchuria, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Home Islands)
findmeifyoucan
Posts: 579
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 3:11 pm

RE: Attn: Japanese Economics Ministers

Post by findmeifyoucan »

Oh, so you can build up HI incrementally like AC and Engines? I didn't realize that.
User avatar
pompack
Posts: 2585
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 1:44 am
Location: University Park, Texas

RE: Attn: Japanese Economics Ministers

Post by pompack »

ORIGINAL: findmeifyoucan

Oh, so you can build up HI incrementally like AC and Engines? I didn't realize that.

use the green factory button, just like AS and engines
findmeifyoucan
Posts: 579
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 3:11 pm

RE: Attn: Japanese Economics Ministers

Post by findmeifyoucan »

Okay, thanks. I didn't expand HI in Japan proper on purpose because I didn't want to increase it by 500HI or more in a particular city. Kind of a waste and really too tight with supply right now on the home islands with all the stuff I am trying to do in first month of the war.
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16376
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Attn: Japanese Economics Ministers

Post by Mike Solli »

For me, China is a nice choice since one of my house rules is that neither side can bomb the other side's factories there.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
findmeifyoucan
Posts: 579
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 3:11 pm

RE: Attn: Japanese Economics Ministers

Post by findmeifyoucan »

Wow, you have a friendly war going on in China! Hee, hee.
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16376
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Attn: Japanese Economics Ministers

Post by Mike Solli »

Yeah, the reason is that if either side bombs out the enemy industry, that side will starve.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”