Nuremberg does not tolerate french garrison

Post bug reports and ask for support here.

Moderator: MOD_EIA

Post Reply
Cunctator
Posts: 182
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 12:12 pm
Location: Italy

Nuremberg does not tolerate french garrison

Post by Cunctator »

We are playing Yearworld's classic scenario.
In the first turn Austria dowed Ansbach and France took control of it.
In the french reinforcement phase it was impossible to place a french garrison in that minor.
Help!

C.
- Scutum Romae -
"Gladius et Scutum Romae" appellabantur. Hannibal se recepit, Marcellus expugnavit Syracusas, Cunctator Capuam. Postremo Quintus Fabius Maximus expugnavit Tarentum.
Grognot
Posts: 409
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:37 pm

RE: Nuremberg does not tolerate french garrison

Post by Grognot »

France shouldn't be allowed to put a French garrison there during reinforcement, because it's not part of the French home nation.  If France had a corps there already, it'd be legal to transfer factors into the corps (provided the corps met the 'supply chain no more than X depots' length) and then a garrison (*if* France is at war), but not otherwise.

--
Not a grognard.
Not an optimizer. It's a game to me, not a job.
Cunctator
Posts: 182
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 12:12 pm
Location: Italy

RE: Nuremberg does not tolerate french garrison

Post by Cunctator »

I'm sorry but I was inaccurate.
The program does not allow me to put 2 inf factors of garrison of Ansbach nationality into the capital city, Nuremberg.
France (me) took control of Ansbach after an austrian dow on that minor.
In the following french reinforcement phase I tried to place in Nuremberg the (Ansbachish?) minor garrison but I couldn't.
That is the problem.
Marshall may you solve it?
C.
 
 
- Scutum Romae -
"Gladius et Scutum Romae" appellabantur. Hannibal se recepit, Marcellus expugnavit Syracusas, Cunctator Capuam. Postremo Quintus Fabius Maximus expugnavit Tarentum.
User avatar
delatbabel
Posts: 1252
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:37 am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

RE: Nuremberg does not tolerate french garrison

Post by delatbabel »

In theory, if you're playing a "classic" scenario, then minor nations which do not have corps also do not have garrisons.

Ergo: no problem.
--
Del
Cunctator
Posts: 182
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 12:12 pm
Location: Italy

RE: Nuremberg does not tolerate french garrison

Post by Cunctator »

Oh yes, but all the other minors I dowed in the same turn (Modena, Breisgau, Baden) regularly placed their garrisons, while Nuremberg remains open and undefended against the austrians.
 
Ergo: we have a problem, but we can go on.
 
C.
- Scutum Romae -
"Gladius et Scutum Romae" appellabantur. Hannibal se recepit, Marcellus expugnavit Syracusas, Cunctator Capuam. Postremo Quintus Fabius Maximus expugnavit Tarentum.
Dancing Bear
Posts: 1003
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:16 pm

RE: Nuremberg does not tolerate french garrison

Post by Dancing Bear »

Ansbach had another bug in that it was not appearing on the list of minors that cold be selected to be taken as a surrender condition (mantis 608). I wonder if the two errors are related. However, I do know for sure that if Ansbach goes neutral in the 1805 game, you do get to place its garrison.
 
The surrender condition bug was fixed for version 1.08, maybe this will clear this up?
User avatar
Yearworld
Posts: 201
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 5:37 pm
Contact:

RE: Nuremberg does not tolerate french garrison

Post by Yearworld »

I've checked and Ansbach should have a garrison in our Classic game. It must be a bug that you can't place the minor forces there as you should be able to.

Yearworld
Cunctator
Posts: 182
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 12:12 pm
Location: Italy

RE: Nuremberg does not tolerate french garrison

Post by Cunctator »

The strange fact is that during the french reinf phase I placed minor garrisons in Gottingen, Tuscany, a local corp in Morocco, etc.
I saw that I had to place 2 inf factors for Ansbach, but nothing happend when I clicked on Nuremberg.
After various attempts I decided to finish the phase and I received the correct warning from the program informing me that I would have lost the unplaced factors.
Surely it is a bug.
I think that we can go on, leaving this small advantage to the Austrians.
C.
 
- Scutum Romae -
"Gladius et Scutum Romae" appellabantur. Hannibal se recepit, Marcellus expugnavit Syracusas, Cunctator Capuam. Postremo Quintus Fabius Maximus expugnavit Tarentum.
User avatar
Marshall Ellis
Posts: 5630
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2001 3:00 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: Nuremberg does not tolerate french garrison

Post by Marshall Ellis »

Can you send me your game?
Thank you

Marshall Ellis
Outflank Strategy War Games


Cunctator
Posts: 182
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 12:12 pm
Location: Italy

RE: Nuremberg does not tolerate french garrison

Post by Cunctator »

here it is
Attachments
classic1_F..orcement.zip
(135.67 KiB) Downloaded 3 times
- Scutum Romae -
"Gladius et Scutum Romae" appellabantur. Hannibal se recepit, Marcellus expugnavit Syracusas, Cunctator Capuam. Postremo Quintus Fabius Maximus expugnavit Tarentum.
User avatar
Ted1066
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 12:46 am
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

RE: Nuremberg does not tolerate french garrison

Post by Ted1066 »

ORIGINAL: Cunctator

Oh yes, but all the other minors I dowed in the same turn (Modena, Breisgau, Baden) regularly placed their garrisons, while Nuremberg remains open and undefended against the austrians.

Ergo: we have a problem, but we can go on.

C.

And as the terrible, awful player that I am I TOTALLY exploited this absence of garrison [:)]

Ted
Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”