Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16091
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Mike Solli »

1 Mar 42
 
SE Fleet
 
The Allied remnants from Lae and Pt. Moresby have been crawling through the jungle toward Terapo.  I have 2 Naval Guard units there.  Three small Allied units arrived and I counterattacked them, driving them out and destroying D Coy/NG Rifles and killing 138 for the loss of 36.
 
China 
 
I attacked Chengchow, getting 2:1 odds and reducing the fort from 3 to 2.  I lost 448 while causing 736 casualties.  Reinforcements are enroute.  I will continue to attack.
 
Other Stuff
 
The Aichi Ha-60 engine advanced it's r&d by a month.
 
The I-122 returned to duty after hitting a mine on 18 Dec.  Her flot was at 91! Banzai!
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Zeta16
Posts: 1178
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 6:35 am
Location: Columbus. Ohio

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Zeta16 »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

cap_and_gown, good stuff.  I always match merchant speeds and make sure they get escorts at least as fast.  I'm considering using the Tonan Whalers to move fuel from Singapore to Formosa.  I suspect they can't move it all on their own, but can't figure that out until make it back home.  I'm not sure they'll be able to dock at Takao in one TF, but again I have to check that out later.

I plan on converting all the Std- series, A through F.  Somewhere earlier I may have mentioned just the C & D models because that's all I have right now.  I'm not sure when the A & B models begin to arrive.


Why not use Hong Kong or Manila instead?
"Ours was the first revolution in the history of mankind that truly reversed the course of government, and with three little words: 'We the people.' 'We the people' tell the government what to do, it doesn't tell us." -Ronald Reagan
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10644
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by PaxMondo »

Mike, are you coming back?
Pax
User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7401
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Q-Ball »

Seriously Solli-San, it's been a couple weeks, we need some economic insight........
Bogo Mil
Posts: 286
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:11 pm

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Bogo Mil »

I just catched up, great AAR so far! [&o]
ORIGINAL: Mike Solli
I like the Kyushu class for resource movement from hubs to the HI.  It has a speed of 18 kts, so it can keep up with fast TKs and it also carries a small amount of liquid (300 tons), so it can augment the TKs for oil movement.
I would not do this. These 300 tons are not enough do help your economy much, but they are enough to make sure that EVERY hit destroys the ship.

I think it's better to use these ships to move fuel. Stockpiling fuel is much more important than ressources - your fuel supply will stop much earlier than the ressource supply, and in an emergency you can turn off light industry to save ressources.


Another point: Look at the small island between New Britain and New Guinea (can't recall the name). It's a choke point for subs moving from Oz to the area N of Rabaul and NG - a great place for an ASW TF . If you build a level 1 port there, you can mine the hex, too...
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. (Benjamin Franklin)
User avatar
SqzMyLemon
Posts: 4239
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:18 pm
Location: Alberta, Canada

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by SqzMyLemon »

ORIGINAL: Bogo Mil
ORIGINAL: Mike Solli
I like the Kyushu class for resource movement from hubs to the HI.  It has a speed of 18 kts, so it can keep up with fast TKs and it also carries a small amount of liquid (300 tons), so it can augment the TKs for oil movement.
I would not do this. These 300 tons are not enough do help your economy much, but they are enough to make sure that EVERY hit destroys the ship.

I think it's better to use these ships to move fuel. Stockpiling fuel is much more important than ressources - your fuel supply will stop much earlier than the ressource supply, and in an emergency you can turn off light industry to save ressources.

I think you are contradicting yourself here if I'm not mistaken? I have to agree with Mike, it's invaluable to have every drop of fuel/oil getting delivered to the hubs or HI's. Combining these fast transports with the fast tankers leaving from hubs or bases that supply both resources and fuel/oil is a great way to maximise the efficiency of your transport TF's. As far as possible losses goes, I'd rather lose a 300ton liquid capacity ship than a 11800ton one, maybe they'd draw the odd torpedo attack away from a tanker [;)]. Just my thoughts.
Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)
Bogo Mil
Posts: 286
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:11 pm

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Bogo Mil »

You can crossload fuel (but not oil!) into the cargo bay, 1t fuel uses 2t space. Thus the ship can carry some 3000t fuel - much better than 5400t ressources plus 300t oil. If you make the valuable fast xAKs more vulnerable by loading liquids, you should load enough to make it worthwhile.
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. (Benjamin Franklin)
User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7401
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Q-Ball »

I wonder where Major Mike is.....no posts in almost 3 weeks
User avatar
USSAmerica
Posts: 19211
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 4:32 am
Location: Graham, NC, USA
Contact:

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by USSAmerica »

I'm pretty sure he's just really busy right now.  
Mike

"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett

"They need more rum punch" - Me

Image
Artwork by The Amazing Dixie
seille
Posts: 2048
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:25 am
Location: Germany

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by seille »

I´m worried about Mike. Nearly 6 weeks without even a login here.
Hope he is just busy, but such a abrupt disappearance doesn´t look good to me.
 
He and his thread was one of the reasons to try japan GC. VERY helpful.
User avatar
BrucePowers
Posts: 12090
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 6:13 pm

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by BrucePowers »

I think he is doing National Guard stuff.
For what we are about to receive, may we be truly thankful.

Lieutenant Bush - Captain Horatio Hornblower by C S Forester
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16091
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Mike Solli »

Hi guys.  I'm back.  Bruce is right, it's been work.  I've been pretty much out of town for most of the duration.  I'm back, finally.  I have a couple of weeks worth of turns to post.  I hope to get on that later today.  Hell, I'm not even sure what's going on any more. [:D]
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16091
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Mike Solli »

Hi guys.  I'm back.  Bruce is right, it's been work.  I've been pretty much out of town for most of the duration.  I'm back, finally.  I have a couple of weeks worth of turns to post.  I hope to get on that later today.  Hell, I'm not even sure what's going on any more. [:D]
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
USSAmerica
Posts: 19211
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 4:32 am
Location: Graham, NC, USA
Contact:

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by USSAmerica »

Good to see you back, Mike, and hard at work judging from your double post.  [:D]
Mike

"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett

"They need more rum punch" - Me

Image
Artwork by The Amazing Dixie
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16091
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: USS America

Good to see you back, Mike, and hard at work judging from your double post.  [:D]

You got it, Mike. [;)]
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Hi guys.  I'm back.  Bruce is right, it's been work.  I've been pretty much out of town for most of the duration.  I'm back, finally.  I have a couple of weeks worth of turns to post.  I hope to get on that later today.  Hell, I'm not even sure what's going on any more. [:D]
Welcome back, Mike!

HIJM's accountants are showing up at my doorstep with pitchforks and torches! Quick-help us wrestle this economy! [:)]
Image
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16091
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Hi guys.  I'm back.  Bruce is right, it's been work.  I've been pretty much out of town for most of the duration.  I'm back, finally.  I have a couple of weeks worth of turns to post.  I hope to get on that later today.  Hell, I'm not even sure what's going on any more. [:D]
Welcome back, Mike!

HIJM's accountants are showing up at my doorstep with pitchforks and torches! Quick-help us wrestle this economy! [:)]

[:D] I really missed all you crazies.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
offenseman
Posts: 768
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:05 pm
Location: Sheridan Wyoming, USA

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by offenseman »

Welcome Back. I eagerly await the updates!  
Sometimes things said in Nitwit sound very different in English.
User avatar
Cribtop
Posts: 3890
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 1:42 pm
Location: Lone Star Nation

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Cribtop »

Banzai! Welcome back.
Image
User avatar
Tone
Posts: 161
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 2:25 pm
Location: Around The Sun

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

Post by Tone »

I am Happy now - Masutā kyōshi has returned.
Both the victor
and the vanquished are
but drops of dew,
but bolts of lightning -
thus should we view the world.
Ôuchi Yoshitaka
1507-1551
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”