THE THREAD!!!
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
- Chickenboy
- Posts: 24648
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
- Location: San Antonio, TX
RE: THE THREAD!
Don't some of the test matches literally take days to work through?ORIGINAL: sprior
Baseball has the great advantage over cricket of being sooner ended.
George Bernard Shaw

RE: THE THREAD!
I liked watching it live, but can't watch it on TV.
"Grown ups are what's left when skool is finished."
"History started badly and hav been geting steadily worse."
- Nigel Molesworth.
"History started badly and hav been geting steadily worse."
- Nigel Molesworth.
- Chickenboy
- Posts: 24648
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
- Location: San Antonio, TX
- USSAmerica
- Posts: 19211
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 4:32 am
- Location: Graham, NC, USA
- Contact:
RE: THE THREAD!!!
ORIGINAL: Grollub
This is starting to get sick ...![]()
Starting.... yeah..... right. [:D]
Mike
"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett
"They need more rum punch" - Me

Artwork by The Amazing Dixie
"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett
"They need more rum punch" - Me

Artwork by The Amazing Dixie
RE: THE THREAD!
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
Don't some of the test matches literally take days to work through?ORIGINAL: sprior
Baseball has the great advantage over cricket of being sooner ended.
George Bernard Shaw
5
"Grown ups are what's left when skool is finished."
"History started badly and hav been geting steadily worse."
- Nigel Molesworth.
"History started badly and hav been geting steadily worse."
- Nigel Molesworth.
RE: THE THREAD!
US football is just now starting to see the results of the 20+ years of youth program development. Among kids in this country, football is by far the most popular sport.
So there is plenty of talent coming up through the ranks. The biggest issue is that great athletes who can play multiple sports do not choose football because the professional payoff is so much lower....or you have to play overseas.
"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Ok ... that "might" have been an understatement [:D]ORIGINAL: USS America
ORIGINAL: Grollub
This is starting to get sick ...![]()
Starting.... yeah..... right. [:D]
“Not mastering metaphores is like cooking pasta when the train is delayed"
- USSAmerica
- Posts: 19211
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 4:32 am
- Location: Graham, NC, USA
- Contact:
RE: THE THREAD!!!
A Martian sighting! 

Mike
"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett
"They need more rum punch" - Me

Artwork by The Amazing Dixie
"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett
"They need more rum punch" - Me

Artwork by The Amazing Dixie
RE: THE THREAD!
ORIGINAL: sprior
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
Don't some of the test matches literally take days to work through?ORIGINAL: sprior
Baseball has the great advantage over cricket of being sooner ended.
George Bernard Shaw
5
And even then you might not have a winner.
[center]
Bigger boys stole my sig

Bigger boys stole my sig
RE: THE THREAD!
And even then you might not have a winner.
It's a a bit like making a baby, you don't always succeed but it's fun trying.
"Grown ups are what's left when skool is finished."
"History started badly and hav been geting steadily worse."
- Nigel Molesworth.
"History started badly and hav been geting steadily worse."
- Nigel Molesworth.
- ChickenOfTheSea
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 7:38 pm
- Location: Virginia
RE: THE THREAD!
ORIGINAL: anarchyintheuk
Hmmm . . . looking up the movie on imdb, I'm shocked, shocked to find out John Milius was involved. That it was basically his baby. This from the guy who worked on Apocalypse Now, Conan, 1941 and Rome. I guess everyone needs a mortgage payment.
On the remake imdb page, apparenty the Cubans are out and the Chinese are in.
Actually heard one of the writers discuss this movie a while back. He said the intent was completely misinterpreted when people took it literally. It was more intended to communicate the effect of being invaded and occupied in a way that American's could understand better. Kind of "put yourself in their shoes and maybe you will undertand better" sort of thing. Therefore the biggest failing of the movie was that it failed to communicate what was intended and came off as a cross between paramoia and propaganda. Rewatching the movie after you know the intent, however, improves it a lot.
I have no idea what the new one will be like, but the history of remakes is pretty awful ... really awful ... ungodly awful.
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is. - Manfred Eigen
- Chickenboy
- Posts: 24648
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
- Location: San Antonio, TX
RE: THE THREAD!
Hey, after 5 straight days of *anything* I'm ready for a break...ORIGINAL: sprior
And even then you might not have a winner.
It's a a bit like making a baby, you don't always succeed but it's fun trying.

RE: THE THREAD!
Chicken salad,chicken stew,chicken & dumplings.........
RE: THE THREAD!
chicken marengo, chicken fingers,chicken wings......
- ChickenOfTheSea
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 7:38 pm
- Location: Virginia
RE: THE THREAD!
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
So , Chickenboy, like how many more threads are you going to create from which I'm excluded? I'm not even playing against you and I'm being kept in the dark. And sir, would you be so kind , when you create yet ANOTHER "Steve keep out" thread, please do me the cortesey of putting it in the AAR section (where it belongs) so that several times a day when I look at the War room , yet again I'm kept from seeing THE NUMBER ONE THREAD!!!!!! [:D]
(Please insert sarcasm smiley here , whenever they get around to making one).
Steve,
As your good and faithful spy, Chickenboy's secret plan is
"Buc, buc, buc ... begac!!!"
which I have not yet been able to decode.
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is. - Manfred Eigen
-
anarchyintheuk
- Posts: 3958
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 7:08 pm
- Location: Dallas
RE: THE THREAD!
ORIGINAL: ChickenOfTheSea
ORIGINAL: anarchyintheuk
Hmmm . . . looking up the movie on imdb, I'm shocked, shocked to find out John Milius was involved. That it was basically his baby. This from the guy who worked on Apocalypse Now, Conan, 1941 and Rome. I guess everyone needs a mortgage payment.
On the remake imdb page, apparenty the Cubans are out and the Chinese are in.
Actually heard one of the writers discuss this movie a while back. He said the intent was completely misinterpreted when people took it literally. It was more intended to communicate the effect of being invaded and occupied in a way that American's could understand better. Kind of "put yourself in their shoes and maybe you will undertand better" sort of thing. Therefore the biggest failing of the movie was that it failed to communicate what was intended and came off as a cross between paramoia and propaganda. Rewatching the movie after you know the intent, however, improves it a lot.
I have no idea what the new one will be like, but the history of remakes is pretty awful ... really awful ... ungodly awful.
Thanks for the info concerning the original movie. Was kinda surprised to find out that there was any intent involved. I can forgive a 'gotta pay my rent' movie (which I thought this was) and enjoy it in an unintentional comedic sort of way but can't forgive a movie which tried to make a statement/comment but failed so miserably at it. Still not sure what the writer was trying to communicate . . . . it sucks to be conquered? aren't you glad you're not one of us? criticism of a certain US foreign policy? If you're going to be an effective writer you have to know your audience. When does a US audience take anything but literally (especially the demographic that the movie was targetting)? I now look at those people involved in a worse light than I did before.
Agreed. I hold little hope for the sequel but for inclusion of gratuitous nudity and violence.
- thegreatwent
- Posts: 3011
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 3:42 am
- Location: Denver, CO
RE: THE THREAD!
Lunch Tithe[&o][&o][&o]
Not that I'm taking sides but it was a chicken salad sandwich
Not that I'm taking sides but it was a chicken salad sandwich

- DuckofTindalos
- Posts: 39781
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
- Location: Denmark
RE: THE THREAD!!!
ORIGINAL: anarchyintheuk
ORIGINAL: ChickenOfTheSea
ORIGINAL: anarchyintheuk
Hmmm . . . looking up the movie on imdb, I'm shocked, shocked to find out John Milius was involved. That it was basically his baby. This from the guy who worked on Apocalypse Now, Conan, 1941 and Rome. I guess everyone needs a mortgage payment.
On the remake imdb page, apparenty the Cubans are out and the Chinese are in.
Actually heard one of the writers discuss this movie a while back. He said the intent was completely misinterpreted when people took it literally. It was more intended to communicate the effect of being invaded and occupied in a way that American's could understand better. Kind of "put yourself in their shoes and maybe you will undertand better" sort of thing. Therefore the biggest failing of the movie was that it failed to communicate what was intended and came off as a cross between paramoia and propaganda. Rewatching the movie after you know the intent, however, improves it a lot.
I have no idea what the new one will be like, but the history of remakes is pretty awful ... really awful ... ungodly awful.
Thanks for the info concerning the original movie. Was kinda surprised to find out that there was any intent involved. I can forgive a 'gotta pay my rent' movie (which I thought this was) and enjoy it in an unintentional comedic sort of way but can't forgive a movie which tried to make a statement/comment but failed so miserably at it. Still not sure what the writer was trying to communicate . . . . it sucks to be conquered? aren't you glad you're not one of us? criticism of a certain US foreign policy? If you're going to be an effective writer you have to know your audience. When does a US audience take anything but literally (especially the demographic that the movie was targetting)? I now look at those people involved in a worse light than I did before.
Agreed. I hold little hope for the sequel but for inclusion of gratuitous nudity and violence.
Smacks a little of post-facto rationalization. "Nonono, there really WAS a serious point to Red Dawn". And they're not making a sequel, but a remake; and they must all die for it.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
-
anarchyintheuk
- Posts: 3958
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 7:08 pm
- Location: Dallas
RE: THE THREAD!!!
ORIGINAL: Terminus
ORIGINAL: anarchyintheuk
ORIGINAL: ChickenOfTheSea
Actually heard one of the writers discuss this movie a while back. He said the intent was completely misinterpreted when people took it literally. It was more intended to communicate the effect of being invaded and occupied in a way that American's could understand better. Kind of "put yourself in their shoes and maybe you will undertand better" sort of thing. Therefore the biggest failing of the movie was that it failed to communicate what was intended and came off as a cross between paramoia and propaganda. Rewatching the movie after you know the intent, however, improves it a lot.
I have no idea what the new one will be like, but the history of remakes is pretty awful ... really awful ... ungodly awful.
Thanks for the info concerning the original movie. Was kinda surprised to find out that there was any intent involved. I can forgive a 'gotta pay my rent' movie (which I thought this was) and enjoy it in an unintentional comedic sort of way but can't forgive a movie which tried to make a statement/comment but failed so miserably at it. Still not sure what the writer was trying to communicate . . . . it sucks to be conquered? aren't you glad you're not one of us? criticism of a certain US foreign policy? If you're going to be an effective writer you have to know your audience. When does a US audience take anything but literally (especially the demographic that the movie was targetting)? I now look at those people involved in a worse light than I did before.
Agreed. I hold little hope for the sequel but for inclusion of gratuitous nudity and violence.
Smacks a little of post-facto rationalization. "Nonono, there really WAS a serious point to Red Dawn". And they're not making a sequel, but a remake; and they must all die for it.
I'd settle for them being forced to watch it clockwork orange style. [;)]










