Japanese impalement movement

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
Bomber
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:56 pm

Japanese impalement movement

Post by Bomber »

Can anyone explain or give a solution as to why is it whenever a Japanese land force move into a allied occupied hex (mode is irrelevant combat,move etc) they shock attack and impale themselves totally obliterating friendly units while allies seem to waltz into any hex at will and when they feel like it attack without ever suffering the same punji stick effect?
This is becoming quite the BS game as a result of this!!
User avatar
khyberbill
Posts: 1941
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:29 pm
Location: new milford, ct

RE: Japanese impalement movement

Post by khyberbill »

I have never had that happen to me. I always play allies.
"Its a dog eat dog world Sammy and I am wearing Milkbone underwear" -Norm.
User avatar
witp1951
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:29 pm
Location: Tennessee

RE: Japanese impalement movement

Post by witp1951 »

I've only seen shock attacks upon movement into a hex at river crossings and island invasions. Give some specifics.
Baka wa shinanakya naoranai

Dog
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: Japanese impalement movement

Post by topeverest »

Bomber,

Witp1951 is correct. Shock attack on Atolls and across rivers. I have experienced both as either side. It may be possible in certain other rare instances too.
Andy M
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6427
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: Japanese impalement movement

Post by JeffroK »

japanese banzai attacks?

Now let me look up some historical precedent for that!

Apart from above, I have seen them when odds are more than 1-100, but still rare.
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
User avatar
Feinder
Posts: 7188
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 7:33 pm
Location: Land o' Lakes, FL

RE: Japanese impalement movement

Post by Feinder »

As mentioned, Japanese or Allied, anybody that crosses a river into a enemy hex, has to make a shock attack.
And if landing on an enemy atoll, you have to shock attack.

-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

Image
User avatar
Bradley7735
Posts: 2073
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 8:51 pm

RE: Japanese impalement movement

Post by Bradley7735 »

This isn't completely related to the ops message, but....

I'm playing allies vs Japanese AI. There were a LOT of landings that the Japanese made during the first 3 months where they attacked the first turn they landed. Of course, some of the places were Atols, but not all. I would say that 75% of the time the Japanese AI landed, they attacked the first turn. Of the other 25%, sometimes the AI would land non-infantry units that couldn't attack, and sometimes the attack went as it's supposed to; land on one turn, attack on the 2nd turn.

I'm assuming that this is something that is either unintentional, or something to help the AI go faster. And, since it's the AI, it doesn't bother me. But, maybe that's what the Op is talking about?

When moving land units by marching, I only see shock attacks when they cross rivers. And, when they land on atols. That's it. Never seen it happen any other time.
The older I get, the better I was.
User avatar
Feinder
Posts: 7188
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 7:33 pm
Location: Land o' Lakes, FL

RE: Japanese impalement movement

Post by Feinder »

Memory is kinda fuzzy, but I think a fast transport landing vs. enemy base that is not atoll will also trigger a shock attack. It used to be that way in WitP, but I'm not sure if it's still around in AE.

-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

Image
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Japanese impalement movement

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: Bradley7735

This isn't completely related to the ops message, but....

I'm playing allies vs Japanese AI. There were a LOT of landings that the Japanese made during the first 3 months where they attacked the first turn they landed. Of course, some of the places were Atols, but not all. I would say that 75% of the time the Japanese AI landed, they attacked the first turn. Of the other 25%, sometimes the AI would land non-infantry units that couldn't attack, and sometimes the attack went as it's supposed to; land on one turn, attack on the 2nd turn.

I'm assuming that this is something that is either unintentional, or something to help the AI go faster. And, since it's the AI, it doesn't bother me. But, maybe that's what the Op is talking about?

There was such a bug, IIRC it even affected a unit that moved via land once in a while. I know it was fixed but don't remember when.
Bomber
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:56 pm

RE: Japanese impalement movement

Post by Bomber »

Thanks for the comments
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: Japanese impalement movement

Post by crsutton »

Also if you are reinforcing a stack in a contested hex-even if you are crossing a friendly hex side, if it is a river hex there is a chance your single unit will shock attack with disasterous results. Experience is a big factor. So beware when crossing river hexes with your craptacular Chinese units. [;)]
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”