Civ 5 Manual
Moderator: maddog986
RE: Civ 5 Manual
Finished the demo 2x with two different nations, although the small map is way too crowded with city states for my taste. Switched from default difficulty level to Prince and it was a bit more challenging now. The one thing I enjoy is the new combat system, feels sorta like Panzer General. But then again, waging war seems to be the most feasible way to play CiV 5. On the other hand it's highly visible that Firaxis streamlined CiV for the sake of higher 'accessibility' (the disease of all modern games). Two things I noticed: there are no nation leaders to choose from anymore and land units don't need ship transports, but can embark themselves and 'walk' over water, considering one researched the according technology. Why companies always have to remove attributes instead of enhancing depth and details is beyond me.
Mind you, I'm rather the guy who plays a video game until he beats it and loose interest after. So loyal fanboys might come to a different conclusion and Civ 5 is in no way a bad game. Just not my cup of tea, as it doesn't require enough thinking.
Mind you, I'm rather the guy who plays a video game until he beats it and loose interest after. So loyal fanboys might come to a different conclusion and Civ 5 is in no way a bad game. Just not my cup of tea, as it doesn't require enough thinking.
- JudgeDredd
- Posts: 8362
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 7:28 pm
- Location: Scotland
RE: Civ 5 Manual
I'm not sure you could choose a nation leader anyway - you could choose a nation, but the leader was assigned to you from what I recall in Civ IV
Alba gu' brath
RE: Civ 5 Manual
Warspite1ORIGINAL: JudgeDredd
I'm not sure you could choose a nation leader anyway - you could choose a nation, but the leader was assigned to you from what I recall in Civ IV
Some nations had more than one leader so you could choose e.g. England had Elizabeth I, Victoria or Churchill. These were not all available from the first release - I think Churchill and maybe Victoria came with the expansions.
Now Maitland, now's your time!
Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
RE: Standards
Need to get something off my chest....
I had a quick look at the manual and this has certainly whet my appetite for the game - roll on Friday! However I was very disappointed about one thing. The phrase P***ED off is used in one section to describe anger at something.
I know its not the worst swear word in the world, but why the need for it? In the UK, standards of speech seem to be dropping all the time. Dropping of H's seems to be a pre-requisite for young T.V / radio presenters getting hired. Swearing is becoming common place in radio edit versions of pop songs too. Even so, I was still naive enough to be shocked that this language appears in a game manual like this.
As someone who rarely looks at a manual (would rather just jump in and learn through play) I do not know if Matrix are "guilty" of this drop in standards too - but I hope not.
I had a quick look at the manual and this has certainly whet my appetite for the game - roll on Friday! However I was very disappointed about one thing. The phrase P***ED off is used in one section to describe anger at something.
I know its not the worst swear word in the world, but why the need for it? In the UK, standards of speech seem to be dropping all the time. Dropping of H's seems to be a pre-requisite for young T.V / radio presenters getting hired. Swearing is becoming common place in radio edit versions of pop songs too. Even so, I was still naive enough to be shocked that this language appears in a game manual like this.
As someone who rarely looks at a manual (would rather just jump in and learn through play) I do not know if Matrix are "guilty" of this drop in standards too - but I hope not.
Now Maitland, now's your time!
Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
RE: Standards
Its pretty unfunny that the full game is not yet released...
but the demo is accesible on steam ...
[:@]
but the demo is accesible on steam ...
[:@]
RE: Standards
Warspite1ORIGINAL: 2guncohen
Its pretty unfunny that the full game is not yet released...
Why? It was always scheduled for September 24th as far as I know.
Now Maitland, now's your time!
Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
RE: Standards
@Warsprite1
I heard the retail is already released in the shops ^^
I heard the retail is already released in the shops ^^
- JudgeDredd
- Posts: 8362
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 7:28 pm
- Location: Scotland
RE: Standards
That would wind me up too Warspite. I've been saying for the last couple of years that bad language and the lack of proper, intellectual use of the English language is creeping in more and more - enhanced by radio and pop stars....made more acceptable in no small way with Chris Moyles radio show - on between 6:30 and 10am - and he continuously uses the word arse - regularly - every morning!
Civility is definitely taking a nose dive
Civility is definitely taking a nose dive
Alba gu' brath
RE: Standards
Shop just said they mailed civ5. Should receive it before weekend.
"99.9% of all internet arguments are due to people not understanding someone else's point. The other 0.1% is arguing over made up statistics."- unknown poster
"Those who dont read history are destined to repeat it."– Edmund Burke
"Those who dont read history are destined to repeat it."– Edmund Burke
- goodwoodrw
- Posts: 2665
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 12:19 pm
RE: Standards
I agree, let me say my language isn't best, but I don't swear around my kids, and I won't let anyone either, if this is an ebook manual, the publishers have no excuse and should remove asap, after all it is game directed towards players of all ages. Life is becoming a sad event. I'm with you Warspite and Judge.
Ron
Ron
Formerly Goodwood
RE: Standards
ORIGINAL: JudgeDredd
That would wind me up too Warspite. I've been saying for the last couple of years that bad language and the lack of proper, intellectual use of the English language is creeping in more and more - enhanced by radio and pop stars....made more acceptable in no small way with Chris Moyles radio show - on between 6:30 and 10am - and he continuously uses the word arse - regularly - every morning!
Civility is definitely taking a nose dive
Well said....
RE: Standards
ORIGINAL: JudgeDredd
That would wind me up too Warspite. I've been saying for the last couple of years that bad language and the lack of proper, intellectual use of the English language is creeping in more and more - enhanced by radio and pop stars....made more acceptable in no small way with Chris Moyles radio show - on between 6:30 and 10am - and he continuously uses the word arse - regularly - every morning!
Civility is definitely taking a nose dive
Good post JD. [&o] Here in the States it is really bad. We could go on forever about the moral issues and cause a ton of fights too. I'm outta here. [X(]
RE: Standards
ORIGINAL: wodin
ORIGINAL: JudgeDredd
That would wind me up too Warspite. I've been saying for the last couple of years that bad language and the lack of proper, intellectual use of the English language is creeping in more and more - enhanced by radio and pop stars....made more acceptable in no small way with Chris Moyles radio show - on between 6:30 and 10am - and he continuously uses the word arse - regularly - every morning!
Civility is definitely taking a nose dive
Well said....
I'm not sure if I view this the same way. I'm not offended by speech in and of itself. I'm not the type of person that's going to start crying when someone uses the word PI**ED. I find that utterly ridiculous to be honest. What I am bothered by is proper grammar. If swear words are used in a grammatically correct sentence, I've no issue with it. But simply being offended by the use of a word is laughable. I do agree that a certain level of professionalism should be displayed in written materials unless of course there's a common light-hearted theme throughout.
I hope you guys aren't that uptight. Loosen that belt.
Windows 7 Home Premium (x64)
3.4 gigahertz AMD Phenom 965 Quad Core
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 1024Meg
4GB RAM
3.4 gigahertz AMD Phenom 965 Quad Core
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 1024Meg
4GB RAM
RE: Standards
Warspite1ORIGINAL: Knavery
ORIGINAL: wodin
ORIGINAL: JudgeDredd
That would wind me up too Warspite. I've been saying for the last couple of years that bad language and the lack of proper, intellectual use of the English language is creeping in more and more - enhanced by radio and pop stars....made more acceptable in no small way with Chris Moyles radio show - on between 6:30 and 10am - and he continuously uses the word arse - regularly - every morning!
Civility is definitely taking a nose dive
Well said....
I'm not sure if I view this the same way. I'm not offended by speech in and of itself. I'm not the type of person that's going to start crying when someone uses the word PI**ED. I find that utterly ridiculous to be honest. What I am bothered by is proper grammar. If swear words are used in a grammatically correct sentence, I've no issue with it. But simply being offended by the use of a word is laughable. I do agree that a certain level of professionalism should be displayed in written materials unless of course there's a common light-hearted theme throughout.
I hope you guys aren't that uptight. Loosen that belt.
Not sure anyone was "crying" about it. Three or four people were merely expressing a view; lamenting the fact that standards are in decline.
There are a number of measures by which standards can be seen to be in decline; bad language, lazy speech, lack of manners, lack of civility, lack of respect are perhaps chief amongst them.
Frankly I find strange the fact that you think the following scenario is okay; namely, if I am sitting on a train with my two young children and a group of people opposite are talking about the night before and the fact that they got S*** faced, W***ered, and at the end of the evening had a fight with a load of *****, then thats perfectly okay so long as the sentences that contain the profanity are perfectly formed and gramatically correct [8|]
I have no problem with bad language in itself - indeed there are times when only a really well placed use of a four letter word really hits the spot. But like everything there is a time and a place; a computer game manual, read by children, is not the correct place in my opinion.
Its just an opinion - but to suggest that anyone holding it is ridiculous, uptight, or someone to be laughed at is a bit of a shame.
Now Maitland, now's your time!
Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
- JudgeDredd
- Posts: 8362
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 7:28 pm
- Location: Scotland
RE: Standards
Knavery
I have kids. I swear like a trooper - but I do not swear in front of my kids. I think the "establishment" should uphold those values or at the very least allow me to uphold them - my kids hear and probably say worse - what I'm talking about is the desensitisation of swearing.
Swearing has a place and it can get your point across forcefully - however, if over used, it loses it's "spike". If you know what I'm talking about and are still ok with swearing becoming commonplace regardless of the audience, then you'll find before long 4 and 5 years olds using it and no-one will bat an eyelid.
As an example - there's a word used commonly on the gaming circuit and, I've recently discovered, in the public place - rape. "You raped me on TF2 last night" - "I was facebook raped last night"....this word has very exceptional meaning. It's tied to a horrendous, disgusting act of violence and is now being used commonplace. Now the more that word is used, the less "abhorrent" it sounds - even when linked to the act ual crime.
That's what I'm talking about...swear words becoming common place to have an effect two fold - 1. that younger and younger kids will think there's nothing wrong with it and 2. desensitisation of the effects of the words. This is becoming increasingly worse with mobile phones - because people forget the "public" space they're in and decide to have their loud mouthed, foul language conversations in public and assault everyones ears with it - including my two children - with whom, as I pointed out, I do not swear in front of.
Not crying - it's just a shame to see standards slip
I have kids. I swear like a trooper - but I do not swear in front of my kids. I think the "establishment" should uphold those values or at the very least allow me to uphold them - my kids hear and probably say worse - what I'm talking about is the desensitisation of swearing.
Swearing has a place and it can get your point across forcefully - however, if over used, it loses it's "spike". If you know what I'm talking about and are still ok with swearing becoming commonplace regardless of the audience, then you'll find before long 4 and 5 years olds using it and no-one will bat an eyelid.
As an example - there's a word used commonly on the gaming circuit and, I've recently discovered, in the public place - rape. "You raped me on TF2 last night" - "I was facebook raped last night"....this word has very exceptional meaning. It's tied to a horrendous, disgusting act of violence and is now being used commonplace. Now the more that word is used, the less "abhorrent" it sounds - even when linked to the act ual crime.
That's what I'm talking about...swear words becoming common place to have an effect two fold - 1. that younger and younger kids will think there's nothing wrong with it and 2. desensitisation of the effects of the words. This is becoming increasingly worse with mobile phones - because people forget the "public" space they're in and decide to have their loud mouthed, foul language conversations in public and assault everyones ears with it - including my two children - with whom, as I pointed out, I do not swear in front of.
Not crying - it's just a shame to see standards slip
Alba gu' brath
- JudgeDredd
- Posts: 8362
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 7:28 pm
- Location: Scotland
RE: Standards
oh - and my point with the DJ Chris Moyles is this - he's on early in the morning till 10 am - a BIG kids audience waiting for him. Now I don't use the phrases he uses in front of my children - I find it offensive to me that I have to pay the BBC to have him do it for me!
Alba gu' brath
RE: Standards
ORIGINAL: warspite1
Warspite1ORIGINAL: Knavery
ORIGINAL: wodin
Well said....
I'm not sure if I view this the same way. I'm not offended by speech in and of itself. I'm not the type of person that's going to start crying when someone uses the word PI**ED. I find that utterly ridiculous to be honest. What I am bothered by is proper grammar. If swear words are used in a grammatically correct sentence, I've no issue with it. But simply being offended by the use of a word is laughable. I do agree that a certain level of professionalism should be displayed in written materials unless of course there's a common light-hearted theme throughout.
I hope you guys aren't that uptight. Loosen that belt.
Not sure anyone was "crying" about it. Three or four people were merely expressing a view; lamenting the fact that standards are in decline.
There are a number of measures by which standards can be seen to be in decline; bad language, lazy speech, lack of manners, lack of civility, lack of respect are perhaps chief amongst them.
Frankly I find strange the fact that you think the following scenario is okay; namely, if I am sitting on a train with my two young children and a group of people opposite are talking about the night before and the fact that they got S*** faced, W***ered, and at the end of the evening had a fight with a load of *****, then thats perfectly okay so long as the sentences that contain the profanity are perfectly formed and gramatically correct [8|]
I have no problem with bad language in itself - indeed there are times when only a really well placed use of a four letter word really hits the spot. But like everything there is a time and a place; a computer game manual, read by children, is not the correct place in my opinion.
Its just an opinion - but to suggest that anyone holding it is ridiculous, uptight, or someone to be laughed at is a bit of a shame.
Warspite1 and JudgeDredd,
I have no children. Perhaps this is why you're a bit more sensitive to the issue of swearing. I don't swear in front of kids, because I think it's in bad taste. I do slip once in a while, but try to catch myself when I can. It's just common sense to hold your tongue in certain circumstances.
Warspite1,
Don't put words in my mouth. I did not say the scenario you so eloquently described was okay. As a matter of fact, I never brought up kids at all. I'm talking about adult language spoken by adults with tact taken into consideration. But I DO find it rather ridiculous and uptight that an adult would find certain words offensive or insulting by themselves. After all, words alone mean nothing--It's the context with which they're used.
But I see your issue with it. Since I don't have children, I don't think about some of these things. Please accept my apology if I pi**ed you off.
Windows 7 Home Premium (x64)
3.4 gigahertz AMD Phenom 965 Quad Core
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 1024Meg
4GB RAM
3.4 gigahertz AMD Phenom 965 Quad Core
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 1024Meg
4GB RAM
RE: Standards
[/quote]
Please accept my apology if I pi**ed you off.
[/quote] Warspite1
Knavery, apology accepted [8D]
Now P*** off [;)][:)]
Now Maitland, now's your time!
Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
Duke of Wellington to 1st Guards Brigade - Waterloo 18 June 1815
RE: Standards
ORIGINAL: warspite1
Please accept my apology if I pi**ed you off.
[/quote] Warspite1
Knavery, apology accepted [8D]
Now P*** off [;)][:)]
[/quote]
Hehe... See that's the kind of thing I like to see. Good light-hearted fun.
Windows 7 Home Premium (x64)
3.4 gigahertz AMD Phenom 965 Quad Core
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 1024Meg
4GB RAM
3.4 gigahertz AMD Phenom 965 Quad Core
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 1024Meg
4GB RAM
RE: Civ 5 Manual
ORIGINAL: wodin
I play and throw away cos 99.9999999999999999999999% of games have NO lasting appeal.....I certainly wont be playing any games on my hard drive in 20 years anyway...granted there are time si wiosh I could play a game I have ditched BUT I'm sure if I installed it again it wouldn't stay on my hard drive there was a reason it left in the first place...
Well I guess you never played Master of Magic and wanted to play it again? Let's see how about Alpha Centauri? You never want to play that again? Oh wait you don't like civilization games as I recall? So you're telling me you're going to toss BftB away an $80 game and have no interest in playing it 20 years from now? I have a laptop full of old DOS games I play and some are 20 years old or near abouts. Renegade Legion Interceptor is still one of the best tactical space fighter games around. And let's not forget all of Matrixgames titles that will still be being played and sold (hopefully) 20 years from now. What about Steel Panthers? Don't tell me you've taken that one off your hard drive? Combat Missions? Lord I hope someone shoots me if I ever remove those from my hard drive. There's plenty of games already 10 years old that are still great today. Many 15 to 20 years old as well. Come on guys tell him all the old games you still play (if your computer will let you) that are older than dirt!
X3:Universe of games rules them all!! Xtra coming soon X3:REBIRTH 4th qtr 2011 YAY!






