BACK IN BUSINESS - PzB goes East again(st) Andy Mac

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Tennant Creek recaptured!

Post by Nomad »

Night Naval bombardment of Hiva Oa at 192,169 - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

33 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
CA Mogami
CA Maya
DD Maikaze
DD Naganami
DD Yugumo

CA Mogami firing at 223rd USN Base Force
223rd USN Base Force firing at CA Mogami
CA Maya firing at 223rd USN Base Force
223rd USN Base Force firing at CA Maya
223rd USN Base Force firing at DD Maikaze
DD Maikaze firing at 223rd USN Base Force
DD Naganami firing at 223rd USN Base Force
223rd USN Base Force firing at DD Naganami
DD Yugumo firing at 223rd USN Base Force
223rd USN Base Force firing at DD Yugumo

It will help a lot if you will put one of the seaplane units on night recon.
erstad
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 11:40 pm
Location: Midwest USA

RE: Tennant Creek recaptured!

Post by erstad »

- In AE the only thing that counts is adjusted AV.

Only for the assault phase. Adjusted AV doesn't do anything for the fire phase. This can be important because if you outnumber the opponent and/or have better firepower and/or have more resilient units (e.g., full divisions) you can come out ahead even if the odds look crappy. Even a 1 to 10 can be productive under the right circumstances. But you need to keep an eye on the loss ratio from the attacks.
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10867
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Tennant Creek recaptured!

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: Nomad


It will help a lot if you will put one of the seaplane units on night recon.
I find that I have to have a float from each ship on recon. I haven't yet seen a float plane spotting for any ship except the one it is based on. Have I just had bad die rolls?
Pax
User avatar
stuman
Posts: 3945
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 8:59 am
Location: Elvis' Hometown

RE: Tennant Creek recaptured!

Post by stuman »

ORIGINAL: krupp_88mm

Image

Ground combat at Hiva Oa
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), relaxing tropical getaway(+) disruption(-), preparation(-)
experience(-)
Attacker: leaders(-) should have used american express(-)


Man, I want to be there, on a porch, sipping a tonic and gin, debating exactly how we are going to cook the fish that we caught earlier in the day.
" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley

Image
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Tennant Creek recaptured!

Post by Nomad »

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

ORIGINAL: Nomad


It will help a lot if you will put one of the seaplane units on night recon.
I find that I have to have a float from each ship on recon. I haven't yet seen a float plane spotting for any ship except the one it is based on. Have I just had bad die rolls?

I think just one is enough - it says it is spotting for one ship, but the entire Bombardment goes well:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Naval bombardment of Johore Bahru at 50,83

Japanese aircraft
no flights

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-43-Ic Oscar: 2 destroyed on ground
Ki-46-I Dinah: 1 destroyed on ground
A6M2 Zero: 5 destroyed on ground

Allied Ships
CA Exeter
CA Cornwall
CL Caledon
CL Glasgow
CL Ceres
CL Durban
CL Dragon

Japanese ground losses:
408 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 28 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled



Resources hits 1
Airbase hits 9
Airbase supply hits 7
Runway hits 56
Port hits 13
Port fuel hits 7
Port supply hits 2

Walrus II acting as spotter for CA Exeter
CA Exeter firing at Johore Bahru
CA Cornwall firing at Johore Bahru
CL Caledon firing at Johore Bahru
CL Glasgow firing at Johore Bahru
CL Ceres firing at Imperial Guards Division
CL Durban firing at Imperial Guards Division
CL Dragon firing at Johore Bahru
---------------------------------------------------
I feel certain that the Walrus really spotted for all of them to get that kind of result.
User avatar
Mynok
Posts: 12108
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 12:12 am
Contact:

RE: Tennant Creek recaptured!

Post by Mynok »


Interesting. A use for Pete's.
"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Tennant Creek recaptured!

Post by witpqs »

When Michael explained the code, he said as long as one plane is on recon, doesn't even matter if it's day or night they just check for the mission assignment. Consider that you can't always predict if the attack will go in during night or daylight, it's good the way they did it.
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Tennant Creek recaptured!

Post by Nomad »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

When Michael explained the code, he said as long as one plane is on recon, doesn't even matter if it's day or night they just check for the mission assignment. Consider that you can't always predict if the attack will go in during night or daylight, it's good the way they did it.

That may be the way that Michael intended, but I have noticed that I get much better night bombardments using a night flying recon float plane. I just put one unit on night and one unit on day and I am covered.
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10867
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Tennant Creek recaptured!

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: Nomad

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

ORIGINAL: Nomad


It will help a lot if you will put one of the seaplane units on night recon.
I find that I have to have a float from each ship on recon. I haven't yet seen a float plane spotting for any ship except the one it is based on. Have I just had bad die rolls?

I think just one is enough - it says it is spotting for one ship, but the entire Bombardment goes well:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Naval bombardment of Johore Bahru at 50,83

Japanese aircraft
no flights

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-43-Ic Oscar: 2 destroyed on ground
Ki-46-I Dinah: 1 destroyed on ground
A6M2 Zero: 5 destroyed on ground

Allied Ships
CA Exeter
CA Cornwall
CL Caledon
CL Glasgow
CL Ceres
CL Durban
CL Dragon

Japanese ground losses:
408 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 28 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled



Resources hits 1
Airbase hits 9
Airbase supply hits 7
Runway hits 56
Port hits 13
Port fuel hits 7
Port supply hits 2

Walrus II acting as spotter for CA Exeter
CA Exeter firing at Johore Bahru
CA Cornwall firing at Johore Bahru
CL Caledon firing at Johore Bahru
CL Glasgow firing at Johore Bahru
CL Ceres firing at Imperial Guards Division
CL Durban firing at Imperial Guards Division
CL Dragon firing at Johore Bahru
---------------------------------------------------
I feel certain that the Walrus really spotted for all of them to get that kind of result.
Thanks. I would have to agree based upon the results. This helps a lot with the planning and clicking! [:)]
Pax
User avatar
PzB74
Posts: 5069
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2000 8:00 am
Location: No(r)way

RE: Tennant Creek recaptured!

Post by PzB74 »

Will try night recon next time; honestly I would think that army spotters ashore could do that job but good tip! [:)]

All the dive bombers were set to ground attack while all the torpedo bombers were set to airfield attack.
180 crack KB bombers caused nill casualties together. Same did bombardments and defensive AV was trebled.

Didn't know Nuku Oa was a mountain resort, any attacks in jungle or rough terrain requires enormous odds to succeed.
The biggest challenge is that the offensive AV seems to be reduced in accord with how the defenders combat value is increased.

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Dec 26, 42

Air Combat

We loose 17 bombers that lost their escort over Myitkyina today; We swept the place and had 15 Nicks on LRCAP and they claimed some enemies but in total
we lost 46 to the enemy's 19 ac today.

Our ground pounders at Shwebo inflicted rather heavy casualties today, making me to believe the enemy is on the march! To face us or to retreat?

I will skip all the air combat reports from Burma today and jump to the most interesting part: Mini KB Strikes! [8D]
The Mini KB without the escort carriers includes only the Junyo and 2 CVL's, not a great force but it still wields a punch.

Unfortunately the biggest convoy was in a rain squall in the PM turn so we only obliterated a smaller convoy with our biggest strike.


Morning Air attack on TF, near Cochin at 27,40
Weather in hex: Moderate rain

Raid detected at 40 NM, estimated altitude 19,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 17 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 22
B5N1 Kate x 11
B5N2 Kate x 12

Japanese aircraft losses
B5N1 Kate: 2 damaged
B5N2 Kate: 1 damaged

Allied Ships
AMC Chitral, Bomb hits 2, on fire
DD Vampire
xAKL Tatung, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAP Kepong
xAK Michael Embiricos
xAP Matang, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk

Aircraft Attacking:
7 x B5N2 Kate bombing from 3000 feet
Naval Attack: 2 x 250 kg SAP Bomb
11 x B5N1 Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
Naval Attack: 1 x 18in Type 91 Torpedo
5 x B5N2 Kate bombing from 4000 feet
Naval Attack: 2 x 250 kg SAP Bomb

Heavy smoke from fires obscuring AMC Chitral
Heavy smoke from fires obscuring xAKL Tatung
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on TF, near Trivandrum at 27,43
Weather in hex: Moderate rain

Raid spotted at 41 NM, estimated altitude 20,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 15 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 11
D3A1 Val x 9

No Japanese losses

Allied Ships
xAK City of Lille, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires
xAK Ravnaas
ML No. 310

Allied ground losses:
Vehicles lost 9 (5 destroyed, 4 disabled)

Aircraft Attacking:
9 x D3A1 Val releasing from 2000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 250 kg SAP Bomb

Heavy smoke from fires obscuring xAK City of Lille
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Trivandrum at 27,43
Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid spotted at 48 NM, estimated altitude 18,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 20 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 22
B5N1 Kate x 7
B5N2 Kate x 12
D3A1 Val x 18

Japanese aircraft losses
B5N2 Kate: 1 damaged

Allied Ships
xAK Ravnaas, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAK City of Lille, Bomb hits 7, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAK San Alvaro, Bomb hits 2, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
xAK Historian, Bomb hits 3, heavy fires, heavy damage
ML No. 310

Allied ground losses:
Vehicles lost 25 (13 destroyed, 12 disabled)

Aircraft Attacking:
6 x D3A1 Val releasing from 3000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 250 kg SAP Bomb
7 x B5N2 Kate bombing from 3000 feet
Naval Attack: 2 x 250 kg SAP Bomb
7 x B5N1 Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
Naval Attack: 1 x 18in Type 91 Torpedo
12 x D3A1 Val releasing from 1000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 250 kg SAP Bomb
5 x B5N2 Kate bombing from 5000 feet
Naval Attack: 2 x 250 kg SAP Bomb

Heavy smoke from fires obscuring xAK Ravnaas
Heavy smoke from fires obscuring xAK City of Lille
Heavy smoke from fires obscuring xAK Historian
Heavy smoke from fires obscuring xAK San Alvaro

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground Combat

Our armored division was stopped dead in their tracks by the jungle and Chindits that were airlifted in.
Andy captured the dot base Bhama to our rare with the same Chindit unit. My hope was that the tank div would shock attack
as it pursued across the river. This didn't happen and with that our chance of a victory here also waned. If nothing else we
attracted plenty attention and spent Andy's airborne reserve.

Ground combat at Myitkyina (64,42)
Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 5631 troops, 128 guns, 505 vehicles, Assault Value = 374
Defending force 3220 troops, 35 guns, 4 vehicles, Assault Value = 139

Japanese adjusted assault: 110
Allied adjusted defense: 178

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 3)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker: leaders(+), fatigue(-)

Japanese ground losses:
178 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 7 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 23 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 8 disabled
Vehicles lost 46 (4 destroyed, 42 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
110 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 9 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Assaulting units:
Guards Tank Division

Defending units:
2nd Gordons Battalion
RM Viper Force
77th Chindit Bde /1
108th RAF Base Force
177 Wing /1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Bhamo (63,44)
Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 381 troops, 6 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 29
Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 0
Allied adjusted assault: 24

Japanese adjusted defense: 1

Allied assault odds: 24 to 1 (fort level 0)
Allied forces CAPTURE Bhamo !!!

Combat modifiers
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(+), leaders(-)

Assaulting units:
77th Chindit Bde /2

-----------------------------------------------------

Mini KB Strikes

Hitting the enemy in the Marqueses, Burma, Oz and Indian Ocean; keep him honest!
Many ships carry fuel after we slaughtered so many tankers.


Image
Attachments
SNAG0940.jpg
SNAG0940.jpg (584.94 KiB) Viewed 170 times
Image

"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Tennant Creek recaptured!

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

Humm ,, using the same unit in 2 places (airlifted on the same turn) i have to say i find a bit gamey. but all depends on your house rules i suppose.

If there isnt an AF or port at the target hex (or a really tiny one) then i find that AF/Port attacks do very little/nil damage overall. You'd think a tiny airfield would get obliterated, but can't say i have seen that before. 3 x mountains isnt fun but just think what Andy will have to unload if you leave a 1/2 decent unit there for him [;)]. Esp if he's planning on coming back to the same place because of prep points <evil grin>.

sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
janh
Posts: 1215
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:06 pm

RE: Tennant Creek recaptured!

Post by janh »

Excellent job!&nbsp; And a sneaky move!
Speedysteve
Posts: 15975
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Tennant Creek recaptured!

Post by Speedysteve »

Hi PzB,
&nbsp;
Just my take on it but I think it was a slight error using the Tk Division at Myitkyina. Tanks are best massed in open terrain (as you know) so using them on trails and in jungles isn't their best use. Especially when unsupported with Inf. Divisions.
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
User avatar
PzB74
Posts: 5069
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2000 8:00 am
Location: No(r)way

RE: Tennant Creek recaptured!

Post by PzB74 »

I think we have a house rule against using paras on more than one target.
The Chindit Brigade is an airlifted unit and not a pure para unit? and Andy said it already was base at Myit.
- I do agree; a questionable move. I don't care to much, will move in reverse and run over it in Bhama [;)]

The rason for using the tank div in the jungle was that it moves quickly and carries as much punch as a regular div in a jungle.
My goal was to shock Myit but Andy informed me that pursuit takes places AFTER combat is resloved, this no shock attack.
- Terrain modifiers is nevertheless so extreme that a base for and battalion and 3 forts is enough to stall even a division, especially when disrupted by air strikes.

The Mini KB raid was a small success; Andy said it's the price he pays for using his B-17s for regular duties.
I think he should have placed search assets in Addu atoll and surroundings, but I'm perfectly happy with current arrangements!-)

Tomorrow 2 heavy cruisers will attempt to hit the remainder of the convoy and then return into the ocean.
Mini KB will retire immediately and provide LR CAP for the cruisers.
Image

"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
PzB74
Posts: 5069
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2000 8:00 am
Location: No(r)way

RE: Tennant Creek recaptured!

Post by PzB74 »

Things didn't go completely according to plan in the Indian Ocean. For the xx time I forget to switch off "Remain on station" and our 2 CA's and DD's...remain on station 1
hex from Trivandrum. The exact scenario I wanted to avoid. The enemy ships disbanded into Trivandrum; we missed by 1 hex and no react took place.
- SBDs and level bombers came out, our Zero's shot down some ac but the Atago took 3 1000lb bombs that penetrated. Incredibly enough this amazing ship shrugged it off!! [&o]
15 sys, 8 flood and 4 fires..that's ruggedness!

In Burma Andy is evacing Shwebo, suddenly 18 units were in Kathia and only 4 left in Shwebo. I'm 100% certain he strategic railed his units out; and I remember someone nagging about
not using strat movement on the frontlines - only for behind the lines movement! HA! [:D]

So we're moving to envelope and capture that dreadful Shwebo place again. If Andy is low on supplies a pursuit into Kathia - Myit could be on the table.
What do you think; will we be able to supply an advance in to the jungle here and receive more supplies than Andy?

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Dec 27, 42

Sub Attacks

The sub attacks on the surface and immediately aborts due to damage.
But the sub didn't take any return fire, it aborted due to some <10 sys damage it had.
Is there a bug here?


Sub attack near Lahaina at 189,100

Japanese Ships
SS I-23

Allied Ships
xAKL Mapele, Shell hits 2

SS I-23 attacking on the surface
Hirusawa S. decides to submerge SS I-23 due to damage

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Air Combat

Some air combat in Burma, but nothing major.

Morning Air attack on TF, near Trivandrum at 27,42
Weather in hex: Light cloud

Raid spotted at 41 NM, estimated altitude 17,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 19 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 1

Allied aircraft
Mohawk IV x 11
SBD-1 Dauntless x 13

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
SBD-1 Dauntless: 4 damaged

Japanese Ships
CA Atago, Bomb hits 2
CA Chokai

Aircraft Attacking:
5 x SBD-1 Dauntless releasing from 2000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb
10 x Mohawk IV sweeping at 15000 feet
8 x SBD-1 Dauntless releasing from 4000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb

CAP engaged:
Shoho-1 with A6M2 Zero (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
1 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 15000 , scrambling fighters to 15000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 83 minutes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Trivandrum at 27,42
Weather in hex: Moderate rain

Raid spotted at 25 NM, estimated altitude 17,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 6 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 4

Allied aircraft
Buffalo I x 6

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
Buffalo I: 1 destroyed

CAP engaged:
Shoho-1 with A6M2 Zero (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 4 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 15000
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 2 minutes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Trivandrum at 27,42
Weather in hex: Moderate rain

Raid spotted at 24 NM, estimated altitude 18,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 10 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 3

Allied aircraft
Mohawk IV x 11
SBD-1 Dauntless x 11

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
SBD-1 Dauntless: 2 damaged

Japanese Ships
CA Atago, Bomb hits 1
CA Chokai

Aircraft Attacking:
5 x SBD-1 Dauntless releasing from 4000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb
6 x SBD-1 Dauntless releasing from 2000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb
4 x Mohawk IV sweeping at 15000 feet

CAP engaged:
Shoho-1 with A6M2 Zero (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
3 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 15000 , scrambling fighters to 15000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 39 minutes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Trivandrum at 27,42
Weather in hex: Moderate rain

Raid spotted at 36 NM, estimated altitude 12,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 12 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 1

Allied aircraft
Blenheim IF x 2
Hudson IIIa x 4
Beaufort VIII x 4

No Japanese losses
No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
CA Atago
CA Chokai

Aircraft Attacking:
4 x Beaufort VIII bombing from 12000 feet
Naval Attack: 2 x 500 lb SAP Bomb
4 x Hudson IIIa bombing from 12000 feet
Naval Attack: 4 x 250 lb SAP Bomb

CAP engaged:
Shoho-1 with A6M2 Zero (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
1 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 15000 , scrambling fighters to 14000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 89 minutes

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Image
Attachments
SNAG0942.jpg
SNAG0942.jpg (336.04 KiB) Viewed 170 times
Image

"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
PzB74
Posts: 5069
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2000 8:00 am
Location: No(r)way

RE: Tennant Creek recaptured!

Post by PzB74 »

Night spotters worked like a snake charm! 111 casualties from our cruiser bombardment and our assault achieved a 1-1 odds [8D]
We landed some reinforcements and more supplies, looks like Nuku Oa is in its feet.

Good progress in Burma as well; thinking that we should have shock attacked Shwebo from Mandalay in force, but such decisions are tough calls.
A failure can wreck an entire army.

Looks like we'll be entering 43 on a wave of victories!


AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Dec 28, 42

Invasions and bombardments

TF 1 encounters mine field at Hiva Oa (192,169) - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

1 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
DMS W-22
CA Myoko, Mine hits 1

223rd USN Base Force firing at DMS W-22
DMS W-22 firing at 223rd USN Base Force
8 mines cleared
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TF 37 encounters mine field at Hiva Oa (192,169)

Japanese Ships
DD Tokitsukaze

2 mines cleared
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bombardments

Night Naval bombardment of Hiva Oa at 192,169

Allied aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft losses
No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
CA Haguro
DD Tokitsukaze
DD Hayashio

Allied ground losses:
111 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 20 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 6 disabled
Vehicles lost 10 (2 destroyed, 8 disabled)

Airbase hits 5
Airbase supply hits 2
Runway hits 41
Port hits 12
Port supply hits 2

E13A1 Jake acting as spotter for CA Haguro
CA Haguro firing at Hiva Oa
DD Tokitsukaze firing at Hiva Oa
DD Hayashio firing at Hiva Oa
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-Invasion action off Hiva Oa
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force

19 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
PB Uchide Maru
PB Showa Maru #5
xAK Sinno Maru
CA Myoko
DMS W-22

Japanese ground losses:
11 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

PB Uchide Maru fired at enemy troops
PB Showa Maru #5 fired at enemy troops
Defensive Guns fire at approaching troops in landing craft at 4,000 yards
Defensive Guns fire at approaching troops in landing craft at 2,000 yards
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amphibious Assault at Hiva Oa

TF 1 troops unloading over beach at Hiva Oa, 192,169

Japanese ground losses:
127 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 1 (0 destroyed, 1 disabled)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Invasion Support action off Hiva Oa
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force

9 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
PB Uchide Maru
PB Showa Maru #5
xAK Sinno Maru
DMS W-22

PB Uchide Maru fired at enemy troops
PB Showa Maru #5 fired at enemy troops
Defensive Guns fire at approaching troops in landing craft at 1,000 yards

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sub Attacks

Yet another dud torp hit; Andy is fuming!

Sub attack near Tokara Retto at 99,63

Japanese Ships
E Ishinui
PB Seki Maru #3
E Omae

Allied Ships
SS Kingfish

SS Kingfish launches 6 torpedoes at E Ishinui
Kingfish diving deep ....
E Omae fails to find sub, continues to search...
E Omae fails to find sub, continues to search...
E Omae fails to find sub, continues to search...
E Omae fails to find sub, continues to search...
E Omae fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Air Combat

A good sweep!

Morning Air attack on Myitkyina , at 64,42

Weather in hex: Thunderstorms

Raid spotted at 49 NM, estimated altitude 32,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 13 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-44-IIa Tojo x 32

Allied aircraft
P-38G Lightning x 4
P-39D Airacobra x 3
P-40E Warhawk x 8
P-40K Warhawk x 3

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
P-38G Lightning: 1 destroyed
P-39D Airacobra: 1 destroyed
P-40E Warhawk: 3 destroyed
P-40K Warhawk: 1 destroyed

Aircraft Attacking:
24 x Ki-44-IIa Tojo sweeping at 30000 feet *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 66th Chinese/C Corps, at 60,44
Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid spotted at 25 NM, estimated altitude 14,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-IIa Sally x 19
Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 7
Ki-44-IIa Tojo x 14
Ki-49-IIa Helen x 6

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21-IIa Sally: 8 damaged
Ki-49-IIa Helen: 2 damaged

Allied ground losses:
178 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 11 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 11 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
19 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 10000 feet
Ground Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb
6 x Ki-49-IIa Helen bombing from 10000 feet
Ground Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 66th Chinese/B Corps, at 60,44
Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid spotted at 20 NM, estimated altitude 16,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 6 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-49-IIa Helen x 26

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-49-IIa Helen: 7 damaged

Allied ground losses:
125 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 13 disabled
Non Combat: 5 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
26 x Ki-49-IIa Helen bombing from 10000 feet
Ground Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 1st Indian Heavy AA Regiment, at 59,45 (Shwebo)

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid spotted at 26 NM, estimated altitude 12,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-IIa Sally x 21
Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 14

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21-IIa Sally: 1 destroyed, 5 damaged


Allied ground losses:
17 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 3 (1 destroyed, 2 disabled)

Aircraft Attacking:
20 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 10000 feet
Ground Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground Combat

Defender is low on supplies no doubt this is reducing his AV!
A few more blows and we have captured us another little piece of paradise.

Ground combat at Hiva Oa (192,169)
Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 3390 troops, 36 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 133
Defending force 1948 troops, 13 guns, 28 vehicles, Assault Value = 41

Japanese adjusted assault: 47
Allied adjusted defense: 34

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 2)
Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), disruption(-), preparation(-)
fatigue(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
136 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 9 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
32 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Assaulting units:
144th Infantry Regiment
Yokosuka 6th SNLF /1

Defending units:
3rd Marine Raider Battalion
223rd USN Base Force
8th USN Naval Construction Battalion

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Burma Offensive



Image
Attachments
SNAG0947.jpg
SNAG0947.jpg (564.74 KiB) Viewed 170 times
Image

"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
aprezto
Posts: 824
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:08 pm

RE: Tennant Creek recaptured!

Post by aprezto »

Sheesh, you and dud torpedos!
Image

Image courtesy of Divepac
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: Tennant Creek recaptured!

Post by Nomad »

Just remember that in 4 days those torpedoes get 20% of their dud rate back.
User avatar
Mynok
Posts: 12108
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 12:12 am
Contact:

RE: Tennant Creek recaptured!

Post by Mynok »

looks like Nuku Oa is in its feet

That's an interesting expression....Norwegian?

I'm assuming that holding Myitkyina is not necessary to close the Burma Road, or that you don't care.
"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown
User avatar
PzB74
Posts: 5069
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2000 8:00 am
Location: No(r)way

RE: Tennant Creek recaptured!

Post by PzB74 »

All actually hit the Myoko with a torp at Noku Oa; same ship that previously hit a mine.
Should be ok - more about this later! No time to post last few reports.

The plan was to capture Myit but I couldn't get supplies through; need to build Lashio and maybe Bahma first.
The Burma road is cut and my goal is to fortify in the jungle outside the basin if Andy is receiving enough supplies to stand and fight.
- He will never drive us out of the jungle hexes [8D]

Noku Oa actually fell a couple of turns ago, so that's yet another completed plan.
Need to come up with a new one for 1943. Any suggestions, what should our main goals for 43 be? [:)]

Reactivating destroyed air groups

Here's a tip for you; it's possible to reactivate destroyed air groups.
Right click on them and pay some PP's and they'll return in a year or so.
- Spent 550 PP to "restore" my lost CAGs today!

Image
Attachments
SNAG0950.jpg
SNAG0950.jpg (46.23 KiB) Viewed 170 times
Image

"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”