Bring me the head of Diego Garcia...and the Mayor of Addu Atoll too!

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: Chesty....not Puller

Post by Chickenboy »

I'm sure Cap'n is uninterested in debating the threshhold for 'pressure necrosis' or ability of space occupying masses to cause regional ischemic necrosis in densely vascularized organs, such as the brain. True 'nuff-these are not neoplastic malignancies, but having a space occupying mass in one's head will, over time, cause bad things to occur.

Yes, cysticercosis (a life stage of Taenia) are encysted worms, just little babies. I hear you about a different mechanism of action versus something like a visceral larval migrans (e.g. Baylisascaris spp.) and a probable different prognostic outcome. You want a scary outcome? Check out the neuroencephalitis outcomes with B. procyonis. This disease rises to the 'just shoot me now' level for me.

Sorry for the hijack, Cap'n. But noggin' parasites are quite interesting. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Image
User avatar
rtrapasso
Posts: 22655
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:31 am

RE: Chesty....not Puller

Post by rtrapasso »

I hear you about a different mechanism of action versus something like a visceral larval migrans (e.g. Baylisascaris spp.) and a probable different prognostic outcome. You want a scary outcome? Check out the neuroencephalitis outcomes with B. procyonis. This disease rises to the 'just shoot me now' level for me.

If something is growing in your brain and you can't make it stop (whether it is a virus, a worm, an amoebic organism, or a tumor), this is pretty much a bad thing...
User avatar
Grollub
Posts: 6676
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 11:46 am
Location: Lulea, Sweden

RE: Chesty....not Puller

Post by Grollub »

ORIGINAL: VSWG

ORIGINAL: princep01

Looking at the above pictorial of Burma and China, could someone explain why the Japanese units are pinkish in some cases and a deep red in others. Is this some sort of visual aid in supply status or strength? I've never been able to learn what that means. Thanks and sorry for the intrusion on your excellent AAR.
Darker color = more troops
Correct. The manual says on p.50; "Note that for ground units, airfields and anchor symbols, darker colors indicate either more or stronger forces, while lighter indicate fewer or weaker units."
“Not mastering metaphores is like cooking pasta when the train is delayed"
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Chesty....not Puller

Post by witpqs »

This is quite interesting because now I understand something - my sister has for years been convinced that my brother-in-law functions with no brain at all!
princep01
Posts: 945
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 10:02 pm
Location: Texas

RE: Chesty....not Puller

Post by princep01 »

Thank you responders re the color variations on the land combat units.

As to the brain stuff, I had no idea that so many brain surgeons played war games. Amazing.

If I might take up a little more space on your AAR, I am having trouble working the Polit training thing witht he Allies. I have most of it down, but am curious about how to "see" which pilots are available in the various categories, TRANCOM and General Reserve? Is there a way to look at those categories to see who is available?

Finally, as a squadron nears its withdrawal date, I keep expecting the withdraw option to light up, but it just does not. I end up "disbanding" the unit. Does this satisfy the withdrawal requirement?
User avatar
Mynok
Posts: 12108
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 12:12 am
Contact:

RE: Chesty....not Puller

Post by Mynok »


I know of no brain surgeons here....just a pathologist, a psychiatrist and a veterinarian. [:D]
"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Chesty....not Puller

Post by witpqs »

And Cap is a pediatrician (right?).
User avatar
rtrapasso
Posts: 22655
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:31 am

RE: Chesty....not Puller

Post by rtrapasso »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

And Cap is a pediatrician (right?).

So he has said... [8D]
User avatar
Nemo121
Posts: 5838
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 11:15 am
Contact:

RE: Chesty....not Puller

Post by Nemo121 »

rtrapasso,

Well there are exceptions to every situation. As someone who once worked on a stroke rehab unit for a year though I am comfortable that the simplified view ( hence the use of "eat" vs an explanation of cyst formation etc etc ) presented herein is reasonably accurate. If you get worms in your brain then, sure, maybe you have a 1 in 10,000 shot of full function if your brain looks like swiss cheese. On the other hand that's damned unlikely.

There will always be outliers but, for me, if someone tells me I have worms in my brain then I ain't expecting to be the 1 in 10,000 who still retains full function. Life just doesn't work that way.


Out of interest, who is the pathologist?

There's also an orthopaedic surgeon here too. Not sure I can "out" him though. It isn't that he wouldn't mind us knowing he's an orthopaedic surgeon but if the other orthopods ever realised he used his frontal cortex he'd have to requalify as something else [:D]. Ah, Orthopods, proving there IS life after lobotomy [:D]
John Dillworth: "I had GreyJoy check my spelling and he said it was fine."
Well, that's that settled then.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Chesty....not Puller

Post by witpqs »

Ironic you ask Bob who is the pathologist... [;)]

User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: Chesty....not Puller

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Mynok


I know of no brain surgeons here....just a pathologist, a psychiatrist and a veterinarian. [:D]
I'm two of those. Not into behavior though.
Image
User avatar
Nemo121
Posts: 5838
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 11:15 am
Contact:

RE: Chesty....not Puller

Post by Nemo121 »

Hehe, I thought it might be him but wasn't about to make an assumption.


Chickenboy,
A pathological veterinarian eh? [8D]
John Dillworth: "I had GreyJoy check my spelling and he said it was fine."
Well, that's that settled then.
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: Chesty....not Puller

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Nemo121

Hehe, I thought it might be him but wasn't about to make an assumption.


Chickenboy,
A pathological veterinarian eh? [8D]
Hey, watch it....that's veterinary pathologist, bub. [;)] (Focus on poultry as subspecialty.)
Image
User avatar
sprior
Posts: 8298
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 11:38 pm
Location: Portsmouth, UK

RE: Chesty....not Puller

Post by sprior »

Finally, as a squadron nears its withdrawal date, I keep expecting the withdraw option to light up, but it just does not. I end up "disbanding" the unit. Does this satisfy the withdrawal requirement?

No, disbanding and withdrawing are 2 seperate functions. If a unit is due to withdraw then you should withdraw it.
"Grown ups are what's left when skool is finished."
"History started badly and hav been geting steadily worse."
- Nigel Molesworth.

Image
User avatar
rtrapasso
Posts: 22655
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:31 am

RE: Chesty....not Puller

Post by rtrapasso »

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: Nemo121

Hehe, I thought it might be him but wasn't about to make an assumption.


Chickenboy,
A pathological veterinarian eh? [8D]
Hey, watch it....that's veterinary pathologist, bub. [;)] (Focus on poultry as subspecialty.)
i'm a pathologist, focusing on humans as a subspecialty...[;)]

Actually, i did General Pathology for 15 years* (including neuropathology, and some forensic path), now doing Gastrointestinal Pathology (for the past 15 years).

EDIT: *After medical school and residency.
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Chesty....not Puller

Post by Cap Mandrake »

ORIGINAL: sprior
Finally, as a squadron nears its withdrawal date, I keep expecting the withdraw option to light up, but it just does not. I end up "disbanding" the unit. Does this satisfy the withdrawal requirement?

No, disbanding and withdrawing are 2 seperate functions. If a unit is due to withdraw then you should withdraw it.

This is true but there are times when the withdraw option is greyed out on a unit due for withdrawal. It all seems very mysterious. I have had some success arranging fresh basil leaves in a hexagonal pattern around the monitor.

Using disband does seem to avoid the penalty but I would have to say the jury is out on whether it might cause the end of the world in 2012 when the Mayan calender runs out.

BTW disbanding early does not give a point bonus like "bonus for early withdrawal"*

* Under no circumstances should one use the principle of "early withdrawal" in any other walks of life. You will get a really bad reputation and may have trouble getting dates.

Image
User avatar
Nemo121
Posts: 5838
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 11:15 am
Contact:

RE: Chesty....not Puller

Post by Nemo121 »

Lol!! I find it amusing how this 2012 thing has entered the consciousness. it Is so occidentally-centric and utterly ignores the fact that the Maya viewed time as cyclical. Never did they say that there wouldn't be another long cycle after 2012. 2012 is just the end of one of their long cycles and will mark the beginning of another. It isn't the end of time.

Hell, according to the Maya each short cycle had a theme and the one which finishes in 2012 was a repeat of a disastrous earlier cycle with mass famine and death. This current cycle includes the two world wars so if we are going to believe the Mayas not only will the world not end in 2012 but there will be fewer large wars in the next cycle. There will be a lot of societal change and some revolution though although whether that'll be cultural or physical is anyone's guess.

Bottom line though this view of things having a beginning and finite end is very western. The mayans wee all about cycles. It is amusing to see all various authors etc about 2012 missing this very basic, fundamental point.
John Dillworth: "I had GreyJoy check my spelling and he said it was fine."
Well, that's that settled then.
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Chesty....not Puller

Post by Cap Mandrake »

In regard to the Mexican teen with the cysticercus in the subarachnoid space, we did a myleogram. He had about 15 cysts up and down his spinal canal. We called a muk-i-muk at CDC and they agreed to send us some Praziquantel. The next morning, he woke up with no fever and no headache ate two breakfast trays then his dad signed him out and they went back to Mexico without any meds.

Estoooopeeed gringos....hahahaha.
Image
pws1225
Posts: 1166
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:39 pm
Location: Tate's Hell, Florida

RE: Chesty....not Puller

Post by pws1225 »

ORIGINAL: Nemo121

Lol!! I find it amusing how this 2012 thing has entered the consciousness. it Is so occidentally-centric and utterly ignores the fact that the Maya viewed time as cyclical. Never did they say that there wouldn't be another long cycle after 2012. 2012 is just the end of one of their long cycles and will mark the beginning of another. It isn't the end of time.

Hell, according to the Maya each short cycle had a theme and the one which finishes in 2012 was a repeat of a disastrous earlier cycle with mass famine and death. This current cycle includes the two world wars so if we are going to believe the Mayas not only will the world not end in 2012 but there will be fewer large wars in the next cycle. There will be a lot of societal change and some revolution though although whether that'll be cultural or physical is anyone's guess.

Bottom line though this view of things having a beginning and finite end is very western. The mayans wee all about cycles. It is amusing to see all various authors etc about 2012 missing this very basic, fundamental point.

2012. It's Y2K, Mayan style! Not so bad. Anybody seen my khat?
User avatar
Moondawggie
Posts: 403
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2003 2:11 am
Location: Placer County CA

RE: Chesty....not Puller

Post by Moondawggie »


I know of no brain surgeons here....just a pathologist, a psychiatrist and a veterinarian.

Out of interest, who is the pathologist?

There's also an orthopaedic surgeon here too. Not sure I can "out" him though. It isn't that he wouldn't mind us knowing he's an orthopaedic surgeon but if the other orthopods ever realised he used his frontal cortex he'd have to requalify as something else [:D]. Ah, Orthopods, proving there IS life after lobotomy [:D]

Hey! Don't leave out the Radiation Oncologists here! (Of course, the last case of misdiagnosed "cerebral cysticercosis" I personally saw turned out to be widely metastatic small cell lung carcinoma involving the brain. Didn't end well, either.)

Are you sure you know an Orthopedist who can actually handle the complexity of WITP AE? It ain't radiation physics, but it's damn near close (and just as frustrating!) [:'(]

Mandrake, why did you have to bring up helminthic infections of the central nervous system in the first place? Does Milo sense a new business opportunity here? Perhaps Albendazole's chemical precursors can only be obtained from plants native to Fiji? [;)]
"The Yankees got all the smart ones, and look where it got them."

General George Pickett, the night before Gettysburg
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”