So much for any Japanese range advantage

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
CapAndGown
Posts: 3078
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Virginia, USA

So much for any Japanese range advantage

Post by CapAndGown »

Contrary to what you were taught to believe about the Japanese seeking to have longer range strike aircraft, the Judy now has a shorter range than the Dauntless SBD-5. In truth, the battle of Philippines Sea was staged on a Hollywood back lot. The new patch has set thing to right giving the Judy D4Y1 a normal range of 6 and extended range of 7. Somehow I don't think this is right.
User avatar
wdolson
Posts: 7689
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: So much for any Japanese range advantage

Post by wdolson »

The Judy had a max range of 978 Mi and the SBD-5 had a max range of over 1100 Mi.  The -5 had better range than previous models due to the outer shackles being "wet" and I believe the internal fuel may have been increased a little.

At the Battle of the Philippine Sea, the Japanese were able to launch a close to max range strike because planes low on fuel could divert to the Marianias.  When the USN sent out the strike, I don't believe any SBDs were lost to fuel exhaustion.  Quite a few SB2Cs ran out.  Though I believe the SBDs were the last aircraft launched, which helped.  It also helped that the SBD squadrons participating were the most experienced squadrons in the battle and had better fuel management skill.

Bill
WIS Development Team
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: So much for any Japanese range advantage

Post by m10bob »

Yep...Had a ferry range of 2417 miles, but the "normal" mission range of the Judy was 975.
Judy was a rather small plane, 2 seater and roughly the size of a ZEKE!
Not much room for fuel.
When so many games had the range wrong, we tend to expect the fiction to be the reality.[8D]

Image

CV Zuikaku
Posts: 442
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:25 pm
Location: Legrad, Croatia

RE: So much for any Japanese range advantage

Post by CV Zuikaku »

But how did they end up with such abnormal range first place?? And did they carried 330l drop tanks at all??
User avatar
Skyros
Posts: 1582
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Columbia SC

RE: So much for any Japanese range advantage

Post by Skyros »

The Yokosuka D4Y Suisei ("Comet") was a carrier-borne navy dive bomber and recponnaissance plane that was meant to replace the obsolete Aichi D3A2 "Val" dive bomber, however it proved to be insufficiently armed and protected, and the engine was not altogether reliable. Along with the Kawasaki Ki-61 Hien fighter, it was one of only two Japanese aircraft with an inline engine to be produced in significant numbers. Both aircraft were plagued by engine troubles throughout their careers and therefore failed to perform as well as they might have. The design was originally based on the German Heinkel He-118, for which Japan had acquired the license for production. When the original model of the He-118 was destroyed and the program suspended, the naval authorities were still impressed enough with its potential that they requested that a carrier-based dive bomber be modeled after the Heinkel prototype. The first D4Y1 bombers were ready for operational use in March of 1943, but the aircraft was not a great success. Even the improved D4Y2 models did not change the situation very much. These models were also built in a reconnaissance version, and they were decimated by American fighters. The next version, the D4Y3, had a Mitubishi Kinsei 62 radial engine instead of the original inline engine, and this eliminated several problems. A total of 536 of this version was built. A final version was the D4Y4, which was specifically designed for suicide missions. It was at the controls of a D4Y4 that Admiral Ugaki carried out the last kamikaze attack of the war on August 15, 1945. A total of 2,038 Yokosuka D4Ys were built between spring 1942 and August 1945. The Allied codename for this aircraft was "Judy".

Yokosuka D4Y1 Model 11 (in-line engine)

Type: Carrier Bomber
Service: Japanese Navy Air Force (JNAF)
Crew: 2 (Pilot, gunner)
Armament: two 7.7mm Type 97 machine guns in nose
one flexible 7.92mm Type 1 machine gun in rear position
up to 683 lbs (310 kgs) of bombs
Reference: Francillon: 460, Mondey: n/a

Specifications:
Length: 33' 6.5" (10.22 m)
Height: 12' 0.75" (3.675 m)
Wingspan: 37' 8.75" (11.5 m)
Wing area: 254.027 sq. ft (23.6 sq. m)
Empty Weight: 5379 lbs (2440 kg)
Loaded Weight: 8047 lbs (3650 kg)
Max Weight: 9370 lbs (4250 kg)

Propulsion:
No. of Engines: 1
Powerplant: Aichi AE1A Atsuta 12 12-cylinder liquid-cooled vee engine
Horsepower: 1200 hp

Performance:
Normal Range: 968 st miles (850 naut miles)
Max Range: 2417 st miles (2100 naut miles)
Cruise Speed: 265 mph at 9845 ft (230 kt at 3000 m)
Max Speed: 343 mph at 15585 ft (298 kt at 4750 m)
Climb to/in: 9845 ft (3000 m) in 5 min 14 sec
Ceiling: 32480 ft (9900 m)


http://www.daveswarbirds.com/Nippon/Japanese.htm
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: So much for any Japanese range advantage

Post by crsutton »

I believe that with the drop tank it was one or the other. Either the extra range or the bomb but not both. Can anyone confirm?
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: So much for any Japanese range advantage

Post by crsutton »

ORIGINAL: cap_and_gown

Contrary to what you were taught to believe about the Japanese seeking to have longer range strike aircraft, the Judy now has a shorter range than the Dauntless SBD-5. In truth, the battle of Philippines Sea was staged on a Hollywood back lot. The new patch has set thing to right giving the Judy D4Y1 a normal range of 6 and extended range of 7. Somehow I don't think this is right.


Worse than that, a panel of unbiased judges has determined that your last major carrier victory in your campaign is to be disallowed due the the new range limits. You will have to give back all carriers sunk and replay the turn. In addition, you are now placed on probation, barred from the playoffs for the next two years and must forfeit 30 scholarships.

Sorry it had to come to this......
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10934
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: So much for any Japanese range advantage

Post by PaxMondo »

[:D]

PS: 30 seems a bit harsh, but then the NC2A has no sense of humor at all!
Pax
User avatar
CapAndGown
Posts: 3078
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Virginia, USA

RE: So much for any Japanese range advantage

Post by CapAndGown »

ORIGINAL: crsutton

ORIGINAL: cap_and_gown

Contrary to what you were taught to believe about the Japanese seeking to have longer range strike aircraft, the Judy now has a shorter range than the Dauntless SBD-5. In truth, the battle of Philippines Sea was staged on a Hollywood back lot. The new patch has set thing to right giving the Judy D4Y1 a normal range of 6 and extended range of 7. Somehow I don't think this is right.


Worse than that, a panel of unbiased judges has determined that your last major carrier victory in your campaign is to be disallowed due the the new range limits. You will have to give back all carriers sunk and replay the turn. In addition, you are now placed on probation, barred from the playoffs for the next two years and must forfeit 30 scholarships.

Sorry it had to come to this......

And what do you suppose they are going to do to PzB?

User avatar
CapAndGown
Posts: 3078
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Virginia, USA

RE: So much for any Japanese range advantage

Post by CapAndGown »

ORIGINAL: crsutton

ORIGINAL: cap_and_gown

Contrary to what you were taught to believe about the Japanese seeking to have longer range strike aircraft, the Judy now has a shorter range than the Dauntless SBD-5. In truth, the battle of Philippines Sea was staged on a Hollywood back lot. The new patch has set thing to right giving the Judy D4Y1 a normal range of 6 and extended range of 7. Somehow I don't think this is right.


Worse than that, a panel of unbiased judges has determined that your last major carrier victory in your campaign is to be disallowed due the the new range limits. You will have to give back all carriers sunk and replay the turn. In addition, you are now placed on probation, barred from the playoffs for the next two years and must forfeit 30 scholarships.

Sorry it had to come to this......

You don't suppose Andy Mac was one of those "unbiased judges" do you? [:D]
User avatar
Shark7
Posts: 7936
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: The Big Nowhere

RE: So much for any Japanese range advantage

Post by Shark7 »

Hmm, this removal of the DTs seems to be an error actually. D4Y was plumbed for 2 330 litre drop tanks on the wings, on the same hardpoints that could carry bombs as well. One thing I have noticed is that the D4Y photos I have seen with DTs are all of Judy's being used in the recon role, and not carrying bombs. I'd be willing to bet you had to give up the bomb load for the additional fuel.

Seems to me the correct loadout would be to allow the 2 330 liter droptanks, but in place of bombs (IE it can't carry a bomb with the DTs but can carry out the recon mission).
Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'
User avatar
Mynok
Posts: 12108
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 12:12 am
Contact:

RE: So much for any Japanese range advantage

Post by Mynok »


Probably not a way to code that.
"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown
User avatar
CapAndGown
Posts: 3078
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Virginia, USA

RE: So much for any Japanese range advantage

Post by CapAndGown »

ORIGINAL: Shark7

Hmm, this removal of the DTs seems to be an error actually. D4Y was plumbed for 2 330 litre drop tanks on the wings, on the same hardpoints that could carry bombs as well. One thing I have noticed is that the D4Y photos I have seen with DTs are all of Judy's being used in the recon role, and not carrying bombs. I'd be willing to bet you had to give up the bomb load for the additional fuel.

Seems to me the correct loadout would be to allow the 2 330 liter droptanks, but in place of bombs (IE it can't carry a bomb with the DTs but can carry out the recon mission).

This is already implemented by giving drop tanks to the Recon version.

Also, I want to know if the 1100 mile range for the SBD is with drop tanks or without? If it is with drop tanks, then the range of the Judy without drop tanks should only be a little less than the SBD-5
User avatar
CapAndGown
Posts: 3078
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Virginia, USA

RE: So much for any Japanese range advantage

Post by CapAndGown »

Well, in comparing the SBD-3 with the SBD-5 I see even the SBD-3 out ranges the Judy now, and that is without drop tanks.
User avatar
wdolson
Posts: 7689
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: So much for any Japanese range advantage

Post by wdolson »

ORIGINAL: Skyros
total of 536 of this version was built. A final version was the D4Y4, which was specifically designed for suicide missions. It was at the controls of a D4Y4 that Admiral Ugaki carried out the last kamikaze attack of the war on August 15, 1945. A total of 2,038 Yokosuka D4Ys were built between spring 1942 and August 1945. The Allied codename for this aircraft was "Judy".

One tiny nit: I have seen a picture of Ugaki taken just before taking off on the final kamikaze mission. He was in the backseat, not flying the plane. I don't believe he knew how to fly.

In any case the rest of the blurb matches other sources I've read.

Bill
WIS Development Team
gajdacs zsolt
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 4:29 pm

RE: So much for any Japanese range advantage

Post by gajdacs zsolt »

I somehow always thought the D4Y had an internal bomb bay, but even if it didn't have, don't DBs always carry their bombs below the fuselage?
Image
User avatar
Shark7
Posts: 7936
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: The Big Nowhere

RE: So much for any Japanese range advantage

Post by Shark7 »

ORIGINAL: Zsolo007

I somehow always thought the D4Y had an internal bomb bay, but even if it didn't have, don't DBs always carry their bombs below the fuselage?
Image

Good picture you found there. It does show the internal bomb bay with the bomb bay doors open. Also if you look at the wings, you can see the hard points with their plumbing hook ups.
Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'
gajdacs zsolt
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 4:29 pm

RE: So much for any Japanese range advantage

Post by gajdacs zsolt »

Here you can find a big picture of the only original left (according to the picture's description):
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Japan---Navy/Yokosuka-D4Y-Suisei/1360483/L/
User avatar
JuanG
Posts: 906
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 8:12 pm

RE: So much for any Japanese range advantage

Post by JuanG »

ORIGINAL: Shark7

ORIGINAL: Zsolo007

I somehow always thought the D4Y had an internal bomb bay, but even if it didn't have, don't DBs always carry their bombs below the fuselage?
Image

Good picture you found there. It does show the internal bomb bay with the bomb bay doors open. Also if you look at the wings, you can see the hard points with their plumbing hook ups.

Which means the issue was probably weight; it was either the 660L of fuel, or a 500kg bomb and maybe a pair of smaller ones.

One way to fix this would be to make a '2x 330L Drop Tank' device, and then have it replace the 500kg bomb when used, mounted on the centerline. Even if this dosent look quiet 'right', it should perform as expected - you get the bomb or the tanks, not both.
User avatar
Shark7
Posts: 7936
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: The Big Nowhere

RE: So much for any Japanese range advantage

Post by Shark7 »

ORIGINAL: JuanG

ORIGINAL: Shark7

ORIGINAL: Zsolo007

I somehow always thought the D4Y had an internal bomb bay, but even if it didn't have, don't DBs always carry their bombs below the fuselage?
Image

Good picture you found there. It does show the internal bomb bay with the bomb bay doors open. Also if you look at the wings, you can see the hard points with their plumbing hook ups.

Which means the issue was probably weight; it was either the 660L of fuel, or a 500kg bomb and maybe a pair of smaller ones.

One way to fix this would be to make a '2x 330L Drop Tank' device, and then have it replace the 500kg bomb when used, mounted on the centerline. Even if this dosent look quiet 'right', it should perform as expected - you get the bomb or the tanks, not both.

Thinking along the same lines I am actually. [:)] That would give you access to the tanks for recon or ferry missions, but take away the ability to carry both fuel and a bomb for bombing missions.
Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”