Road to Smolensk bug?

Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: The German-Soviet War 1941-1945 is a turn-based World War II strategy game stretching across the entire Eastern Front. Gamers can engage in an epic campaign, including division-sized battles with realistic and historical terrain, weather, orders of battle, logistics and combat results.

The critically and fan-acclaimed Eastern Front mega-game Gary Grigsby’s War in the East just got bigger and better with Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: Don to the Danube! This expansion to the award-winning War in the East comes with a wide array of later war scenarios ranging from short but intense 6 turn bouts like the Battle for Kharkov (1942) to immense 37-turn engagements taking place across multiple nations like Drama on the Danube (Summer 1944 – Spring 1945).

Moderators: Joel Billings, elmo3, Sabre21

Post Reply
Sherban_MatrixForum
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:05 am

Road to Smolensk bug?

Post by Sherban_MatrixForum »

In the Road to Smolensk scenario, the LVI and XXXXI Panzer Corps in the North have 0 supply and 0 fuel. They are also withdrawn on turn 2, so what's the deal considering that with no supply they cannot reaaly be used on turn 1?
User avatar
Flaviusx
Posts: 7732
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Location: Southern California

RE: Road to Smolensk bug?

Post by Flaviusx »

Not a bug. These are Army Group North forces temporarily included in the scenario to help the German breakthrough during the surprise attack. They get withdrawn afterwards, representing their advance in the direction of Leningrad.

WitE Alpha Tester
Sherban_MatrixForum
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:05 am

RE: Road to Smolensk bug?

Post by Sherban_MatrixForum »

I was thinking that might be the reason. But why include them at all with 0 supply/fuel? Withdrawing them should have been enough, shoudn't it?
User avatar
Flaviusx
Posts: 7732
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Location: Southern California

RE: Road to Smolensk bug?

Post by Flaviusx »

Yeah, zero supply thing might be an oversight. Not sure. Nobody ever caught that because it mostly doesn't matter, the mech units start with their full 50 mps and get the job done before they withdraw.
WitE Alpha Tester
Sherban_MatrixForum
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:05 am

RE: Road to Smolensk bug?

Post by Sherban_MatrixForum »

Well, they certainly push the first front line Soviet unit with ease. However, although this is a hasty attack, most their MPs are spent afterwards (probably due to no fuel/supply), so they cannot be used for a second attack anylonger.
User avatar
Sabre21
Posts: 7877
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2001 8:00 am
Location: on a mountain in Idaho

RE: Road to Smolensk bug?

Post by Sabre21 »

No, it's not an oversight but as designed. That was brought up a while back I recall on the tester forum. I know it looks odd and don't see why those Hq's couldn't have had extra fuel/supplies/ammo assigned to them but since they move off on turn 2 it wasn't considered all that necessary. Walt or Joel could probably answer why better than me on this one.
Image
User avatar
Joel Billings
Posts: 33499
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Contact:

RE: Road to Smolensk bug?

Post by Joel Billings »

The 0 supply/fuel/ammo is a known bug on our list. I've seen a tester post that it has no impact on these units on turn 1, although I would expect that having 0 ammo would have an impact in combats.
All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard
User avatar
Zaratoughda
Posts: 714
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:00 pm
Location: NE Pa, USA

RE: Road to Smolensk bug?

Post by Zaratoughda »

I believe this occurred during one of the times where the scenarios were frozen and worked on with the campaign games, and I was told it was gonna get fixed automatically but I imagine the bug has to do with this not happenning.

So, I manually fixed the problem (was all of 4PG in both RtS and RtM) and have sent you the new scenario files.

Because these units get withdrawn after a turn or two it is not a big deal but still should be fixed.

Zaratoughda
User avatar
Zaratoughda
Posts: 714
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:00 pm
Location: NE Pa, USA

RE: Road to Smolensk bug?

Post by Zaratoughda »

Hmmm... checked these scenarios (been a while) and, all of 4PG gets withdrawn on turn 2 so, this problem should be more of a confusion factor than anything else. In any case, it should be fixed next time these scenarios are released.

Zaratoughda
Magnum88
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 3:01 am

RE: Road to Smolensk bug?

Post by Magnum88 »

4 PzG is very useful even for only one turn. They can isolate almost all the Soviet units east of the Daugava allowing the remaining infantry divisions to mop them up on Turn 2.
User avatar
Zaratoughda
Posts: 714
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:00 pm
Location: NE Pa, USA

RE: Road to Smolensk bug?

Post by Zaratoughda »

That's pretty much what the AI does in the campaign game. 4PG, then heads north.

Zaratoughda
Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series”