Moving Airbases ???

Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: The German-Soviet War 1941-1945 is a turn-based World War II strategy game stretching across the entire Eastern Front. Gamers can engage in an epic campaign, including division-sized battles with realistic and historical terrain, weather, orders of battle, logistics and combat results.

The critically and fan-acclaimed Eastern Front mega-game Gary Grigsby’s War in the East just got bigger and better with Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: Don to the Danube! This expansion to the award-winning War in the East comes with a wide array of later war scenarios ranging from short but intense 6 turn bouts like the Battle for Kharkov (1942) to immense 37-turn engagements taking place across multiple nations like Drama on the Danube (Summer 1944 – Spring 1945).

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21, elmo3

User avatar
nukkxx5058
Posts: 3141
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:57 pm
Location: France

Moving Airbases ???

Post by nukkxx5058 »

Pardon in advance my question that may be stupid or showing I'm an ignirant but how on earth is it possible to move air bases ? I supposed that planes need runways and other equipment which are, by nature, not easily movable. Where are the runways for my planes to take off and land ?

Could anybody clarify this point for me ?

I didn't print and read the manual yet. I am waiting for my Christmas present: a Sony Ebook reader :-))_
Winner of the first edition of the Command: Modern Operations COMPLEX PBEM Tournament (IKE) (April 2022) :-)
User avatar
Rickuh
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:10 am

RE: Moving Airbases ???

Post by Rickuh »

You're not moving runways, but you are moving the mechanics, armorers, fueling & fuel storing equipment, anti-aircraft, and other support. The aircraft just "fly" to the new base location. An important point to keep in mind is that air base units can only launch aircraft if they are located in clear, light woods, or urban hexes.
User avatar
nukkxx5058
Posts: 3141
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:57 pm
Location: France

RE: Moving Airbases ???

Post by nukkxx5058 »

how can an airbase launch an aircraft without runways or worse, from a "light wood" ? Sorry but this makes no sense to me ...

Winner of the first edition of the Command: Modern Operations COMPLEX PBEM Tournament (IKE) (April 2022) :-)
User avatar
Timmeh
Posts: 591
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 5:01 am

RE: Moving Airbases ???

Post by Timmeh »

one word ' abstraction '
User avatar
PyleDriver
Posts: 5906
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:38 pm
Location: Occupied Mexico aka Rio Grand Valley, S.Texas

RE: Moving Airbases ???

Post by PyleDriver »

Back then there was few runways, mainly it was a flat patch of grass...
Jon Pyle
AWD Beta tester
WBTS Alpha tester
WitE Alpha tester
WitW Alpha tester
WitE2 Alpha tester
User avatar
nukkxx5058
Posts: 3141
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:57 pm
Location: France

RE: Moving Airbases ???

Post by nukkxx5058 »

So if I understand well, you are telling me that during east campaign in WW2 airfields were mobile structures ? Is this really historically acurate ?
Winner of the first edition of the Command: Modern Operations COMPLEX PBEM Tournament (IKE) (April 2022) :-)
User avatar
Jim D Burns
Posts: 4001
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: Salida, CA.

RE: Moving Airbases ???

Post by Jim D Burns »

ORIGINAL: nukkxx

how can an airbase launch an aircraft without runways or worse, from a "light wood" ? Sorry but this makes no sense to me ...



Most airfields in Russia were dirt or grass strips. They didn’t need large 8000-9000 foot concrete runways to operate most airframes like the US and British strategic bombers needed. So one week’s time is more than enough to carve out an airstrip capable of handling the airframes in question.

As is mentioned above it’s the base facilities that limit air operations. Mechanics, fuel depots, spare parts, base defense forces, etc. are the big issue when moving your air power from one place to another. And those facilities are represented by the air base counters. The planes assigned to the counters can be assumed to be spread out over many small airfields in its hex and perhaps some of the surrounding hexes, so that part is an abstraction.

Jim
User avatar
nukkxx5058
Posts: 3141
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:57 pm
Location: France

RE: Moving Airbases ???

Post by nukkxx5058 »

ORIGINAL: Timmeh

one word ' abstraction '

No sorry. This is supposed to be deadly accurate game.
Winner of the first edition of the Command: Modern Operations COMPLEX PBEM Tournament (IKE) (April 2022) :-)
User avatar
nukkxx5058
Posts: 3141
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:57 pm
Location: France

RE: Moving Airbases ???

Post by nukkxx5058 »

ORIGINAL: nukkxx


Most airfields in Russia were dirt or grass strips. They didn’t need large 8000-9000 foot concrete runways to operate most airframes like the US and British strategic bombers needed. So one week’s time is more than enough to carve out an airstrip capable of handling the airframes in question.

As is mentioned above it’s the base facilities that limit air operations. Mechanics, fuel depots, spare parts, base defense forces, etc. are the big issue when moving your air power from one place to another. And those facilities are represented by the air base counters. The planes assigned to the counters can be assumed to be spread out over many small airfields in its hex and perhaps some of the surrounding hexes, so that part is an abstraction.

Jim

No sorry. This is supposed to be deadly accurate game.

Ok ... ok ... I get your point. But this is certainly the most bizarre/unrealistic part of the game. Especially when considering the HUGE amount of MP of these structures !
Winner of the first edition of the Command: Modern Operations COMPLEX PBEM Tournament (IKE) (April 2022) :-)
User avatar
PyleDriver
Posts: 5906
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:38 pm
Location: Occupied Mexico aka Rio Grand Valley, S.Texas

RE: Moving Airbases ???

Post by PyleDriver »

US seabees were the best at the time (different front), jungle what jungle theres your air strip...
Jon Pyle
AWD Beta tester
WBTS Alpha tester
WitE Alpha tester
WitW Alpha tester
WitE2 Alpha tester
User avatar
Jim D Burns
Posts: 4001
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: Salida, CA.

RE: Moving Airbases ???

Post by Jim D Burns »

ORIGINAL: nukkxx
Especially when considering the HUGE amount of MP of these structures !

It’s a design decision, but when you consider what moving would entail it’s not as bad as you might think. First you get the order, move your groups to the area southwest of Kiev. You take what 2 or 3 days to get your command packed up and ready to go. Then it takes what half a day to drive to Kiev from the Polish border? Probably less but let’s be generous and say two days.

You then take a day or two unpacking your command and getting your air operations up and running. That’s a week, so I’m not too concerned about the movement distance. Allowing planes to fly in the same turn an airbase moves is another question though.

It’s probably an abstraction made to prevent overcomplicating all the behind the scenes planning that would go into setting up advance airbases in anticipation of the move. It can very well be done (and probably was) with perfect timing so that when the base stuff arrives planes were already on the new airstrips and ready to go, but more often than not there were probably delays involved for most moves.

I’m not familiar with the game enough to tell if moving airbases has a major impact on the performance of those planes or not. But I assume it would have some detrimental effect. If not it should at least for the turn of the move.

Jim
User avatar
Helpless
Posts: 15786
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 3:12 pm

RE: Moving Airbases ???

Post by Helpless »

In fact air base unit is a series of real life airbases operating under one command and geographically located in one region. We don't model air fields as it is done in WITP, where they placed in some particular location/city. This greatly reducing the complexity and allows player to manage better air assets in situation of rapidly advancing/or retreating fronts.

As for movements, for example Soviet air groups were not tied to any particular air base. All personal could be reallocated (fly over) to other place quite fast and use available facilities there. As stated above in many cases such facilities were very minimalistic.
Pavel Zagzin
WITE/WITW/WITE-2 Development
User avatar
Timmeh
Posts: 591
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 5:01 am

RE: Moving Airbases ???

Post by Timmeh »

OK, perhaps an illustration then:

consider then the square counter beside the can of green goodness a typical AF counter in our game. What do they have in common?

Image
Attachments
canofsolyent.jpg
canofsolyent.jpg (7.47 KiB) Viewed 297 times
User avatar
Timmeh
Posts: 591
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 5:01 am

RE: Moving Airbases ???

Post by Timmeh »

OMG.. they're People!

Image
Attachments
heston.jpg
heston.jpg (6.56 KiB) Viewed 296 times
User avatar
nukkxx5058
Posts: 3141
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:57 pm
Location: France

RE: Moving Airbases ???

Post by nukkxx5058 »

It still looks like very unrealistic to me .. sorry guys but that might be the poorest aspect of the game. A huge desapointment ...
Winner of the first edition of the Command: Modern Operations COMPLEX PBEM Tournament (IKE) (April 2022) :-)
MechFO
Posts: 859
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 4:06 am

RE: Moving Airbases ???

Post by MechFO »

ORIGINAL: nukkxx

It still looks like very unrealistic to me .. sorry guys but that might be the poorest aspect of the game. A huge desapointment ...

Believe it or not, it's a very realistic depiction.....


some selected quotes:

Luftwaffe units found themselves shuttling back and forth from battlefront to battlefront throughout the late summer and fall- a situation that only exacerbated supply and maintenance difficulties on the primitive grass fields of the theater. Visiting bases in the east in fall 1941, Milch discovered a catastrophic situation: aircraft were awaiting repairs at a number of bases, but no work was occurring because the units had moved on and the supply system was providing barely enough bombs, fuel and parts to support operations.

On 9 October the Luftwaffe flew only 300 sorties off the sodden grass strips that were its bases. If the Luftwaffe had confronted great difficulties so far, it was now entering a nightmare period.

Only the arrival of cold weather in mid November allowed the ground forces to resume the advance on Moscow. The Luftwaffe, however, was unable to provide much support. Its strength in front of Moscow lay on unimproved airstrips with neither the maintenance nor supply support for sustained operations.

The figures on the Eastern Front were even worse, as Luftwaffe ground crews attempted to repair aircraft in unheated shelters in temperatures well below zero.

http://junebarbarossa.devhub.com/blog/3 ... ern-front/

The source isn't special, but you won't find one which says anything different.
User avatar
Helpless
Posts: 15786
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 3:12 pm

RE: Moving Airbases ???

Post by Helpless »

It still looks like very unrealistic to me .. sorry guys but that might be the poorest aspect of the game. A huge desapointment ...

Why? What would be better model with given game size and complexity, without major impact to the playability?

I'm not saying that air model is perfect, but exiting level of approximation, ihmo, does very good job. There is so many things which can be added on the top and make air war more realistic.
Pavel Zagzin
WITE/WITW/WITE-2 Development
User avatar
karonagames
Posts: 4701
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:05 am
Location: The Duchy of Cornwall, nr England

RE: Moving Airbases ???

Post by karonagames »

Don't get Pavel started on the Air Model!!!!
It's only a Game

User avatar
Helpless
Posts: 15786
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 3:12 pm

RE: Moving Airbases ???

Post by Helpless »

Don't get Pavel started on the Air Model!!!!

I'm on the other side now, Bob [:)]
Pavel Zagzin
WITE/WITW/WITE-2 Development
MechFO
Posts: 859
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 4:06 am

RE: Moving Airbases ???

Post by MechFO »

IMO what might be worthwhile is to give a bonus to repairing damaged aircraft and fatigue reduction to air bases in cities/towns/light urban hexes. There were permanent airfields of various sizes at these places and a permanent airfield did improve many things. After the Germans retreat in 44, the Luftwaffe was comparatively functional because it was suddenly very close to it's home bases and their workshops.

However, this is really only a minor nice to have.
Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series”