Armed Guard

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
Ametysth
Posts: 74
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:21 pm

Armed Guard

Post by Ametysth »

I have been reading about U-boat operations and seen mentions of armed guards, who operated US Merchant Marine vessel's guns. They are always listed along the crew as losses or mentioned as they fought off enemies.

Which service these Armed Guard - gunners belonged? Were they regular Navy, Merchant Marines or Marines (as ship board troops)?

One the related issue, any chance of getting the "Monsoon Boats", German U-boats operating out of Batavia, to the game? Any mods out there? Four of them were taken over by IJN in early 1945 and they even had I-numbers (I-501, -502, -505 and -506)
lolz
Posts: 149
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 11:05 am

RE: Armed Guard

Post by lolz »

iirc ive seen U-501 under combined fleet
edit: its u532
Image
User avatar
YankeeAirRat
Posts: 633
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 4:59 am

RE: Armed Guard

Post by YankeeAirRat »

The Armed Guard were US Navy personnel who manned the guns on most of the Merchant Marine Fleet through out the War. Here is the NHHC's page on the Armed Guard
Take my word for it. You never want to be involved in an “International Incident”.
Ametysth
Posts: 74
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:21 pm

RE: Armed Guard

Post by Ametysth »

Thank you AirRat. Very helpful.

Lolz, that is a IX/C boat. Such boat was indeed in IJN inventory as one was sold to them in 1943, but its number was RO-500. I-501 was originally U-181, a IXD2 type boat (add 9000 miles to range and 6 torpedoes on deck storage).


User avatar
Pascal_slith
Posts: 1657
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 2:39 am
Location: In Arizona now!

RE: Armed Guard

Post by Pascal_slith »

To make the "Monsoon" boats work, they have to be attached to the IJN.  I believe DaBabes included all of these.

See this for a history:  http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/Germany ... index.html


So much WitP and so little time to play.... :-(

Image
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Armed Guard

Post by DuckofTindalos »

We briefly debated including the transferred and seized Italian and German boats in the IJN OOB, but the Japs never used them.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Pascal_slith
Posts: 1657
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 2:39 am
Location: In Arizona now!

RE: Armed Guard

Post by Pascal_slith »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

We briefly debated including the transferred and seized Italian and German boats in the IJN OOB, but the Japs never used them.

But the Germans did operate them independently under the authority of Wenneker in Tokyo.
So much WitP and so little time to play.... :-(

Image
User avatar
stuman
Posts: 3945
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 8:59 am
Location: Elvis' Hometown

RE: Armed Guard

Post by stuman »

Ineresting. So the Germans went to the trouble of operating subs out of Batavia ? I wonder if they sank much shipping.
" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley

Image
User avatar
Pascal_slith
Posts: 1657
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 2:39 am
Location: In Arizona now!

RE: Armed Guard

Post by Pascal_slith »

ORIGINAL: stuman

Ineresting. So the Germans went to the trouble of operating subs out of Batavia ? I wonder if they sank much shipping.

Read the Hyperwar link. They were quite effective during the periods they were able to operate.
So much WitP and so little time to play.... :-(

Image
User avatar
stuman
Posts: 3945
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 8:59 am
Location: Elvis' Hometown

RE: Armed Guard

Post by stuman »

ORIGINAL: Pascal

ORIGINAL: stuman

Ineresting. So the Germans went to the trouble of operating subs out of Batavia ? I wonder if they sank much shipping.

Read the Hyperwar link. They were quite effective during the periods they were able to operate.

Interesting read. Thx for the link.
" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley

Image
User avatar
wwengr
Posts: 680
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, USA
Contact:

RE: Armed Guard

Post by wwengr »

Very interesting read. Thanks for the link.

In WITP terms, it does not look like they were much of a factor. The average turn around time in Batavia was about 70 days and the report talks at length about the lack fo skill maintenance crews and such to keep the boats operational. It appears that they were used to some extent, in Batavia and Singapore, as blockade runners with the intent of pulling raw materials back to Germany.

In terms of combat effectiveness, the claim of 1760 vessels sunk does not distinuguish between early operations in the Southern Ocean, and later operations. As reported the average vessel size for these 1760 was less than 600 tons. This would imply that they mostly sunk fishing boats, coastal barges, and small coastal tramp steemers, which are not units in the game.
I have been inputting my orders for the campaign game first turn since July 4, 2009. I'm getting close. In another month or two, I might be able to run the turn!
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”