War Reports from the Eastern Front: Carnage vs Redmarkus

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

User avatar
Flaviusx
Posts: 7732
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Location: Southern California

RE: Crimea SITREP

Post by Flaviusx »

Don't forget to garrison the ports in the Crimea.
WitE Alpha Tester
User avatar
CarnageINC
Posts: 2208
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:47 am
Location: Rapid City SD

RE: Leningrad SITREP

Post by CarnageINC »

ORIGINAL: Flaviusx

Yes, his fort spam is a total waste of APs. The proper amount of APs that ought to be spent on these in 1941 is approximately zero. He'd be better off simply banking the points if he cannot figure out what to do with them. But there ought to be plenty of other things for him to do with them.

He's dropping hundreds of APs on forts near as I can tell. Total waste.


Not to pry in what's going on over in Red's AAR, but is he getting any advice over there? If he is he must not be following it and shutting down others ideas or something. I usually don't feel bad about beating someone but this has me worried over the long run. I hope he can make a good winter offensive.
User avatar
CarnageINC
Posts: 2208
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:47 am
Location: Rapid City SD

RE: Crimea SITREP

Post by CarnageINC »

ORIGINAL: Flaviusx

Don't forget to garrison the ports in the Crimea.

AH! Good idea, thats the last thing I need in my rear area. Thanks, thats a perfect job for some Romanians.
User avatar
Flaviusx
Posts: 7732
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Location: Southern California

RE: Leningrad SITREP

Post by Flaviusx »

He's going to do what he wants to do and has already decided that the game is badly designed. I consider it pointless to try to give him advice that's going to be disregarded as being "gamey."

WitE Alpha Tester
User avatar
CarnageINC
Posts: 2208
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:47 am
Location: Rapid City SD

Zaporozhye SITREP

Post by CarnageINC »

This is another case of his southern front disintegrating in a instant. BLAM! BOOM! BANG!, and its cracked wide open. When will he learn the hard lesson of defense in depth and to garrison his cities. I hope I managed to capture a factory! [8D]


Image
Attachments
zaporozhye91141.jpg
zaporozhye91141.jpg (247.22 KiB) Viewed 320 times
notenome
Posts: 608
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 11:07 pm

RE: Leningrad SITREP

Post by notenome »

I tried to give him some advice but these youngsters, they never listen.
User avatar
PeeDeeAitch
Posts: 1276
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 4:31 am
Location: Laramie, Wyoming

RE: Crimea SITREP

Post by PeeDeeAitch »

ORIGINAL: CarnageINC

ORIGINAL: Flaviusx

Don't forget to garrison the ports in the Crimea.

AH! Good idea, thats the last thing I need in my rear area. Thanks, thats a perfect job for some Romanians.

Bless the Romanians, Italians, and the Hungarian security brigades and their selfless desire to garrison the rear.
"The torment of precautions often exceeds the dangers to be avoided. It is sometimes better to abandon one's self to destiny."

- Call me PDH

- WitE noob tester
User avatar
CarnageINC
Posts: 2208
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:47 am
Location: Rapid City SD

RE: Leningrad SITREP

Post by CarnageINC »

ORIGINAL: Flaviusx

He's going to do what he wants to do and has already decided that the game is badly designed. I consider it pointless to try to give him advice that's going to be disregarded as being "gamey."

Really?!? I hope he continues play if he considers the game 'badly designed'. I'm putting a lot of time into this AAR and would hate for him to back out on me.

I kind of thought he must be disregarding advice over there. [8|]
User avatar
PeeDeeAitch
Posts: 1276
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 4:31 am
Location: Laramie, Wyoming

RE: Crimea SITREP

Post by PeeDeeAitch »

Reading both AARs, so not really commenting (as I don't want to flavor my responses). I am interested however that one thing from my games vs the AI seems to happen vs players too at times, the late Fall opening up of certain areas as the capture/routing of too many USSR formations hits. The sense I have always gotten from my reading is the "possibility" of large gains, just as the mud hit in 1941 - an added sense of "could have been" in this campaign. For you, Carnage, it seems in the South you are in the position of the real vKleist - open plains ahead (it seems), just no gas and winter closing in...
"The torment of precautions often exceeds the dangers to be avoided. It is sometimes better to abandon one's self to destiny."

- Call me PDH

- WitE noob tester
User avatar
Klydon
Posts: 2305
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 3:39 am

RE: Leningrad SITREP

Post by Klydon »

It looks bad for the Russian (and it is) but bad weather and massive Soviet re-enforcements have a tendency to help even things out. He isn't beat by any means and to think that he is would be a mistake imo.

While the Germans have had spectacular successes (well earned btw), there are some worrying signs. The center around Moscow looks thin and looks really thin when you project the offensive out towards Moscow. Even if you get there, without significant additional troops, I don't think you will be able to keep it, but it still may be worth it from the standpoint of the disruption it will cause. I also agree that this is an area that you don't really send additional troops to yet because you have a shot at Leningrad. If you get that one, you get to keep it and free a pile of Finns up, which is huge. He is under pressure all over, which is good because it means if he tries to save Leningrad, it will mean less troops elsewhere. At this point, the Germans need to kill as many Russian units as possible to prevent him from building up.

Really good AAR and I have been learning quite a bit. Shame he is wasting all those AP's on forts.
User avatar
CarnageINC
Posts: 2208
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:47 am
Location: Rapid City SD

RE: Crimea SITREP

Post by CarnageINC »

ORIGINAL: PeeDeeAitch

Reading both AARs, so not really commenting (as I don't want to flavor my responses). I am interested however that one thing from my games vs the AI seems to happen vs players too at times, the late Fall opening up of certain areas as the capture/routing of too many USSR formations hits. The sense I have always gotten from my reading is the "possibility" of large gains, just as the mud hit in 1941 - an added sense of "could have been" in this campaign. For you, Carnage, it seems in the South you are in the position of the real vKleist - open plains ahead (it seems), just no gas and winter closing in...
Yes this actually has me worried a bit. I'm going to far out run my supply line in the south. I have no troops to cover this frontage yet. Hope fully he won't either unless he takes them from the Sumy front region where he is over-garrisoning IMO.
User avatar
Flaviusx
Posts: 7732
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Location: Southern California

RE: Crimea SITREP

Post by Flaviusx »

Carnage, he flatly refuses to use checkerboards and defense in depth. He considers them dishonorable. Evidently, even garrisons in rear cities violate his code of ethics. This is preposterous, but there it is, and there's no arguing with that kind of stance. For him, the fact that a purely linear defense will not work is evidence of flaws in the game design. He would rather change the game mechanics than alter his play.



WitE Alpha Tester
User avatar
CarnageINC
Posts: 2208
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:47 am
Location: Rapid City SD

RE: Crimea SITREP

Post by CarnageINC »

ORIGINAL: Flaviusx

Carnage, he flatly refuses to use checkerboards and defense in depth. He considers them dishonorable. Evidently, even garrisons in rear cities violate his code of ethics. This is preposterous, but there it is, and there's no arguing with that kind of stance. For him, the fact that a purely linear defense will not work is evidence of flaws in the game design. He would rather change the game mechanics than alter his play.



WOW....[X(]....just....WOW!
User avatar
paullus99
Posts: 1671
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Crimea SITREP

Post by paullus99 »

Well, keep showing him the error of his ways, I guess. [8|]
Never Underestimate the Power of a Small Tactical Nuclear Weapon...
Josh
Posts: 2568
Joined: Tue May 09, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Leeuwarden, Netherlands

RE: Zaporozhye SITREP

Post by Josh »

ORIGINAL: CarnageINC

This is another case of his southern front disintegrating in a instant. BLAM! BOOM! BANG!, and its cracked wide open. When will he learn the hard lesson of defense in depth and to garrison his cities. I hope I managed to capture a factory! [8D]


Image


Wow, just wow indeed, refusal to use a multi layered defense makes this kind of encirclement possible. Cracked wide open. I'd say, have fun. [:D]
User avatar
karonagames
Posts: 4701
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:05 am
Location: The Duchy of Cornwall, nr England

RE: Zaporozhye SITREP

Post by karonagames »

Well, keep showing him the error of his ways, I guess.

Expect a diatribe on why the game should be changed so a linear defence in un-entrenched hexes should be enough to stop panzer corps dead in their tracks.
It's only a Game

raizer
Posts: 276
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 1:30 pm

RE: Zaporozhye SITREP

Post by raizer »

why isnt he railing units to that little town just above the volkhov river...qick rail then a move down a couple hexes in those swamps? THou now that I look at it, its too late cause you are gonna knock that 2-5 out next turn and rail will be cut
User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7850
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

RE: Zaporozhye SITREP

Post by Q-Ball »

Multi-Layered defenses aren't all a bed of roses, either. Although it makes it tougher to get encirclements, if I am the German player I will pick on the weak Rifle Divisions up front, just to gain morale, kill Soviets, and cause routs. Though not as spectacular as encirclements, a couple turns of that will produce high kill ratios, and the Soviets will run-out of "Ready" units to build a checkerboard with. (edit: Do this with Infantry). If you can't easily encircle them, grind the checkerboard a turn or two, and you will see some results I bet.

The Soviets get plenty of bad rifle divisions, but not as many that are ready for action.

But it's better than stacking everyone up front!

User avatar
CarnageINC
Posts: 2208
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:47 am
Location: Rapid City SD

RE: Crimea SITREP

Post by CarnageINC »

I'm kind of disappointed that Red is being so stubborn. It takes away from the game somewhat. Make me wish I never asked. From this point on I really don't want to know what Red's opinions are. I can only hope that he will change his stance on defense or he is a really good offensive player.

I still hope you enjoy the AAR and I will still enjoy the 'glory' of looking so stellar of a player...LOL [:D]
User avatar
Klydon
Posts: 2305
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 3:39 am

RE: Zaporozhye SITREP

Post by Klydon »

I don't think Carnage is gonna like it down south when he gets the turn. An interesting AAR got even more interesting. [:D]
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”