War Reports from the Eastern Front: Carnage vs Redmarkus

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

User avatar
karonagames
Posts: 4701
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:05 am
Location: The Duchy of Cornwall, nr England

RE: Crimea SITREP

Post by karonagames »

why not push as far forward as possible & have a buffer to fall back on

That has always been my approach, but I am doing some "dig in" tests, including using fortified zones, that I have never used previously, but I feel that taking the pressure off gives the Sovs time to put together a better attack, whereas if you attack right through the mud and snow they might need a couple of turns to get organised.

Every approach has pluses and minuses.
It's only a Game

User avatar
Flaviusx
Posts: 7732
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Location: Southern California

RE: Crimea SITREP

Post by Flaviusx »

Carnage I would seriously consider massing your armor in the central Ukraine area, setting yourself up for a large HQ buildup, and grabbing a ton of real estate in open terrain with the idea of increasing your blizzard buffer. I think you could possibly bag a lot of Soviet troops this way, too, given the Soviet linear tactics. And maybe grab Kharkov. I don't like your position in this area right now, you are too close to the Dnepr for comfort.

Don't let those snow turns go to waste.
WitE Alpha Tester
User avatar
RCHarmon
Posts: 322
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 2:41 am

RE: Crimea SITREP

Post by RCHarmon »

Just a suggestion. Let the infantry dig in and mass the panzers and go do some damage and give yourself some breathing room. You might as well use the panzers while you have them. At the end of my blizzard turn against AI my panzers were decimated.
User avatar
PeeDeeAitch
Posts: 1276
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 4:31 am
Location: Laramie, Wyoming

RE: Crimea SITREP

Post by PeeDeeAitch »

A nice snow advance followed by a slow and steady pull back (if it can be managed) of about 2-3 hexes per turn might mitigate at least the first month of blizzard, as the Soviets just can't advance that quickly through enemy controlled hexes and still get good attacks. If there is a prepared line of towns/cities to hit then, it might just frustrate a second month of winter. The Germans don't need space in the south, and wasting time could be profitable...
"The torment of precautions often exceeds the dangers to be avoided. It is sometimes better to abandon one's self to destiny."

- Call me PDH

- WitE noob tester
User avatar
Flaviusx
Posts: 7732
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Location: Southern California

RE: Crimea SITREP

Post by Flaviusx »

And I'm going to second Bob's suggestion of sending the mountain units to the Kuban. Yeah, you'll miss those for defending elsehwere, but it sure would be nice to grab Novorosysk and the nearby swamps in a blizzard offensive and be set up to advance into the clear terrain come next summer.

The idea of an Axis blizzard offensive also appeals to my sense of humor. Playing mind games is half the fun of PBEM, and this is the kind of oddball thing a Soviet player won't expect.



WitE Alpha Tester
User avatar
PeeDeeAitch
Posts: 1276
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 4:31 am
Location: Laramie, Wyoming

RE: Crimea SITREP

Post by PeeDeeAitch »

If you put the skeer (as Forrest said) in your opponant, that is half the battle. He already pulled back and made the Leningrad region more defensible, maybe some mountain troops in the Kuban would stop a major offensive in the blizzard elsewhere.
"The torment of precautions often exceeds the dangers to be avoided. It is sometimes better to abandon one's self to destiny."

- Call me PDH

- WitE noob tester
User avatar
Encircled
Posts: 2097
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Northern England

RE: Crimea SITREP

Post by Encircled »

Carnage I would seriously consider massing your armor in the central Ukraine area, setting yourself up for a large HQ buildup, and grabbing a ton of real estate in open terrain with the idea of increasing your blizzard buffer. I think you could possibly bag a lot of Soviet troops this way, too, given the Soviet linear tactics. And maybe grab Kharkov. I don't like your position in this area right now, you are too close to the Dnepr for comfort.

Don't let those snow turns go to waste.

I got a bit carried away doing that on Turn 16 in my game versus the AI. Sent three Pz groups straight through the Russian Lines North of Orel and opposite Kharkov, and it looks like its going to cost me two motorized divisons.

Ok, I've completely unhinged his southern front, but I'm annoyed that I pushed it just a bit too far.

Saying that, as I'm facing practically nothing south of Kharkov, I'm very tempted to keep going
User avatar
CarnageINC
Posts: 2208
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:47 am
Location: Rapid City SD

Condition Delta

Post by CarnageINC »

I can't believe I let you guys talk me into this...I'm predicting doom for my panzer forces.

Image
Attachments
ZeusOpOrder.jpg
ZeusOpOrder.jpg (137.19 KiB) Viewed 324 times
User avatar
CarnageINC
Posts: 2208
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:47 am
Location: Rapid City SD

RE: Condition Delta

Post by CarnageINC »

Here is the operational map, tell me if you think this is realistic of me.

Image
Attachments
Zeus.jpg
Zeus.jpg (383.86 KiB) Viewed 324 times
User avatar
Flaviusx
Posts: 7732
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Location: Southern California

RE: Condition Delta

Post by Flaviusx »

Looks good to me.

How accurate is your recon? Is Kharkov really empty? (This refusal to garrison cities just boggles me.)

WitE Alpha Tester
User avatar
CarnageINC
Posts: 2208
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:47 am
Location: Rapid City SD

RE: Condition Delta

Post by CarnageINC »

First off, I've decided to with draw 2 out of the 3 corps in the Kuban region. I just don't care enough about the position to risk loosing 9 Corps there. 4 divisions to me is still to much for my liking. Yeah I might be thinking there are bogey men under the bed but I just won't risk it. As far as summer ops there...ehhh...I don't know if I want to invest in there yet or even ever. I got what I wanted and that is to take away some offensive power else where.

Yes Big A i'm suffering from Blizzard Fright. I just don't know what to expect for my first pbem experience.

I'm going to risk some of my panzers to nasty blizzard attacks, I do believe in having a better buffer zone for falling back to. As far as Kuban and mountain troops...no. Their to assist in fire brigade duties.

User avatar
CarnageINC
Posts: 2208
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:47 am
Location: Rapid City SD

RE: Condition Delta

Post by CarnageINC »

ORIGINAL: Flaviusx

Looks good to me.

How accurate is your recon? Is Kharkov really empty? (This refusal to garrison cities just boggles me.)

I've been very through in my reconing of his front, I've established a routine if he's paying attention. I haven't reconed the back yet, I don't want to tip my hand to where I might attack.
User avatar
Flaviusx
Posts: 7732
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Location: Southern California

RE: Condition Delta

Post by Flaviusx »

Taking away some of the infantry from the Kuban isn't a bad idea...provided you replace those with mountain units. That infantry won't be incredibly useful there during the blizzard period anyways. Leave one infantry corps there and bring down all the mountain units and make a grab for Novorosysk during the blizzard...



WitE Alpha Tester
User avatar
Encircled
Posts: 2097
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Northern England

RE: Condition Delta

Post by Encircled »

It does appear to be a massive chance down in the Kuban that you might be passing up on.

Saying that, the effects of the blizzard are going to really affect any decision that the German player makes in '41
randallw
Posts: 2060
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:28 pm

RE: Condition Delta

Post by randallw »

I hope people are really paying attention the rulebook about the X Y coordinates of blizzard areas.  Last month someone thought certain areas didn't have it and Joel felt the need to clarify that the area does have blizzards.
DTurtle
Posts: 443
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:05 pm

RE: Condition Delta

Post by DTurtle »

Shouldn't it be possible to simply run a test game vs the AI - not doing anything - in order to get an accurate picture of blizzard/snow/mud conditions everywhere important?

It might be a bit "gamey", but it seems too important a factor to rely on guessing games, interpretations of the manual, etc.

Otherwise, keep up the good work. :)
timmyab
Posts: 2047
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:48 pm
Location: Bristol, UK

RE: Condition Delta

Post by timmyab »

ORIGINAL: randallw

I hope people are really paying attention the rulebook about the X Y coordinates of blizzard areas.  Last month someone thought certain areas didn't have it and Joel felt the need to clarify that the area does have blizzards.
As far as I can tell that area has 4 or possibly 5 turns of blizzard in January using non-random weather.22.2.1
User avatar
TulliusDetritus
Posts: 5581
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 1:49 am
Location: The Zone™

RE: Condition Delta

Post by TulliusDetritus »

ORIGINAL: CarnageINC

I can't believe I let you guys talk me into this...I'm predicting doom for my panzer forces.

Doom? You're doing incredibly well! [:)] I'd say your opponent is doomed though [8D]
"Hitler is a horrible sexual degenerate, a dangerous fool" - Mussolini, circa 1934
User avatar
Klydon
Posts: 2305
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 3:39 am

RE: Condition Delta

Post by Klydon »

One note on the panzer operation during your snow turns. There is no room for error on the pockets as another German found out in an AAR. The Soviets broke the pocket and it was a disaster for the Germans. I would still do it because wiping out entire sections like you have shown means those sections will likely get no significant pressure for at least a month during the winter (a most important month in December). Certainly gaining another urban hex won't suck either.

One if the interesting things also is will he sit and be passive on mud or will he be aggressive and be attacking?
ComradeP
Posts: 6992
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:11 pm

RE: Condition Delta

Post by ComradeP »

Carnage, if I may suggest something: plan your snow attacks as if you have only 2 turns, not 3, so your main plan involves creating some pocket that's guaranteed to work on the turn you create it and can be cleaned up afterwards. If after the first snow turn, you think you can create a second guaranteed pocket that you can clean up on snow turn 3, do so. You do not want to have your mobile units hanging in the breeze when the blizzard hits, so if you can't make a guaranteed pocket on snow turn 2, don't try.
SSG tester
WitE Alpha tester
Panzer Corps Beta tester
Unity of Command scenario designer
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”