History: Horses in the Wehrmacht

Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: The German-Soviet War 1941-1945 is a turn-based World War II strategy game stretching across the entire Eastern Front. Gamers can engage in an epic campaign, including division-sized battles with realistic and historical terrain, weather, orders of battle, logistics and combat results.

The critically and fan-acclaimed Eastern Front mega-game Gary Grigsby’s War in the East just got bigger and better with Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: Don to the Danube! This expansion to the award-winning War in the East comes with a wide array of later war scenarios ranging from short but intense 6 turn bouts like the Battle for Kharkov (1942) to immense 37-turn engagements taking place across multiple nations like Drama on the Danube (Summer 1944 – Spring 1945).

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21, elmo3

Post Reply
User avatar
Q-Ball
Posts: 7546
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois

History: Horses in the Wehrmacht

Post by Q-Ball »

Interesting Tidbit I found on another forum, as I was interested in Horse replacements, etc, even though it's not modelled in the game:

From an article by R. L. DiNardo and Austin Bay, entitle Horse-Drawn Transport in the German Army , from the Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 23, No. 1.

...by 1939, the German army possessed some 590,000 horses...[the German army] was still primarily dependent on horses, of which Poland was to supply the majority, to the tune of 4000 per week in April of 1940 [...]The campaign [in the west] was also a major boon for the German army's horse situation, as access was now gained to the valuable horse-breeding areas of Holland, Belgium and Normandy [...]By June 1941, the army in the east had assembled some 625,000 horses. Of these, the single largest concentration was in the Fourth Army (twelve infantry and one security divisions), which by 13 June 1941 possessed some 130,000 horses, over 20 per cent of the total number.

Although the campaign [in the east] opened for the Germans with a series of brilliant successes, a number of problems were encountered. During advances in the hot Russian summer, German forces had to make frequent stops - some at great length - in order to water their horses. Worse problems were encountered with providing food, particularly in Army Groups North and Centre. Hard fodder had to be shipped to units through the supply system, creating an additional burden on an already overstrained network.The horses most affected by the food shortage were the heavier western breeds, which were also unaccustomed to the Russian climate. The Russians had large numbers of horses, but these could not be used immediately. The 'panje'* horses were hardy animals, but too light to pull the standard 105 mm artillery gun**. Also, the standard German horse-drawn vehicle was made of steel*** and was too heavy for the Russian horses. It was only after the Germans produced a lighter vehicle - or took Russian wagons - that Russian horses could be used cost-effectively [...]

The winter of 1941 produced the greatest crisis. Horse losses in Army Group Centre had reached about 1000 per day [...]

The standard German infantry division (1939 pattern) required anything from 4077 to 6033 horses to move. However, German divisions rarely had more than 150 horses in reserve. Moreover, German veterinary hospitals, which could handle from 500 (divisional veterinary company) to 550 (army hospital) horses, were swamped, often having to treat 2-3000 horses at one time.

Yet the Wehrmacht survived. Replacements and captured horses were sent to veterinary collecting stations for medical examination. Horses no longer fit for military service but able to work were evacuated and later sold to farmers. Those too weak to be evacuated were slaughtered for meat. Measures like these enabled the army to endure, even though the Germans lost a total of 180,000 horses during the winter of 1941.

For the fateful campaign of 1942, the German horse situation looked better. Over 200,000 horses were brought in from Germany and the occupied countries, although only about half of them had arrived at the front by May. Since the major offensive operations were to be conducted in the south, the divisions in Army Group South obtained the full complement of horses [...] by 1942 the Germans were using much lighter vehicles, or wooden carts, which allowed them to make use of the large number of Russian horses in occupied areas [...]

By 1 February 1945 the Wehrmacht was able to deploy some 1,198,724 horses [...] From 1940 to 1943, the German army requisitioned a total of 1,200,000 horses from Germany and the occupied territories (see the table I've posted below) [...]The total number of horses lost by Germany during the war was estimated at some 1,500,000.[...]

The Wehrmacht's reliance on horses was also deeply felt in European agriculture. The most immediate effect, of course, was on horse population. Equally obvious was the fact that those areas where campaigns were hardest-fought lost the most horses. The Soviet Union's horse population was decimated. From a total of 21,000,000 in 1940, by 1943 the number had fallen to a low of 7,800,000, a drop of almost two thirds. Of the 11,600,000 horses in occupied territory, some 7,000,000 were 'killed or taken away'.

In the west, the horse population in Belgium and the Netherlands fell as Germany's needs increased. In Belgium, the number of horses in agriculture fell from a pre-war 1929 high of 266,433 to a low in 1944 of 222,781**** In the Netherlands, the total number of horses during the war actually increased, although the number of horses in agriculture declined considerably, from 326,000 in 1940 to 302,000 in 1944.



Image
User avatar
Tarhunnas
Posts: 2975
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 10:19 am
Location: Hex X37, Y15

RE: History: Horses in the Wehrmacht

Post by Tarhunnas »

Yep, many people don't realize how horse-dependent Europe was in the 1940:s. (was that spelled correct wonders clueless non-native english speaker?) Another tidbit: In 1924 40% of americans had access to a car. That figure was not exceeded in Western Europe until the 1970:s!
------------------------------
RTW3 Designer
User avatar
cookie monster
Posts: 1690
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 10:09 am
Location: Birmingham,England

RE: History: Horses in the Wehrmacht

Post by cookie monster »

In game message

Howitzer support unit not commited all horses at the hospital!

LOL

Nice post
User avatar
heliodorus04
Posts: 1653
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 5:11 pm
Location: Nashville TN

RE: History: Horses in the Wehrmacht

Post by heliodorus04 »

Cool info.
Fall 2021-Playing: Stalingrad'42 (GMT); Advanced Squad Leader,
Reading: Masters of the Air (GREAT BOOK!)
Rulebooks: ASL (always ASL), Middle-Earth Strategy Battle Game
Painting: WHFB Lizardmen leaders
WilliePete
Posts: 265
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:07 pm

RE: History: Horses in the Wehrmacht

Post by WilliePete »

many will probably view the fact that Germany was not a fully mechanized army as a negative, but I can't help to think of all the benefits the horses provided. Since Germany was always in a dire need of petrol, if it weren't for the horses Germany wouldn't be mobile at all. They provided mobility in all types of weather and conditions when their vehicle counterparts was not up the task.

If used strategically horses could not only be a beast of burden, but also a mobile & fresh food source. I'm sure the acquisition of horses was at the top of the list of things to do when a certain sector of Russia fell into German hands...
- They That Sow The Wind, Shall Reap The Whirlwind -
Smirfy
Posts: 1057
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 8:24 pm

RE: History: Horses in the Wehrmacht

Post by Smirfy »

ORIGINAL: WilliePete

many will probably view the fact that Germany was not a fully mechanized army as a negative, but I can't help to think of all the benefits the horses provided. Since Germany was always in a dire need of petrol, if it weren't for the horses Germany wouldn't be mobile at all. They provided mobility in all types of weather and conditions when their vehicle counterparts was not up the task.

If used strategically horses could not only be a beast of burden, but also a mobile & fresh food source. I'm sure the acquisition of horses was at the top of the list of things to do when a certain sector of Russia fell into German hands...


Germany also had a shortage of manpower and a horse was too labour intensive and inefficent in capacity. The only advantages the horse had over a truck was in that first winter was the German soldiers could eat the horses.
User avatar
Shellshock
Posts: 573
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:23 pm
Location: U.S.

RE: History: Horses in the Wehrmacht

Post by Shellshock »

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball

The 'panje'* horses were hardy animals, but too light to pull the standard 105 mm artillery gun**. Also, the standard German horse-drawn vehicle was made of steel*** and was too heavy for the Russian horses. It was only after the Germans produced a lighter vehicle - or took Russian wagons - that Russian horses could be used cost-effectively [...]

The Germans were pretty impressed by the hardiness of the Russian breeds. The larger German, Hungarian, and Flemish horses were felled by fatigue and hunger, but the scrubby diminutive native ponies survived in subzero temperatures, eating anything, even birch twigs.

During the first months of 1942 some panzer divisions had as many as 2,000 Panje horses but hardly a single serviceable motor vehicle. For that reason they received the nickname "Panje divisions." This unexpected turn of events made the veterinarian the busiest man in any panzer division.
User avatar
Klydon
Posts: 2305
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 3:39 am

RE: History: Horses in the Wehrmacht

Post by Klydon »

ORIGINAL: Smirfy

Germany also had a shortage of manpower and a horse was too labour intensive and inefficent in capacity. The only advantages the horse had over a truck was in that first winter was the German soldiers could eat the horses.

The Germans may have been short on manpower, but they were also short on supply vehicles, prime movers for artillery and gas to move those vehicles. The horse helped a lot in all these areas and I don't really remember reading much on the Germans scaling back on using horses because of manpower issues.

I also have a reference along the lines of what Shellshock mentioned with Panje divisions and the vet being very busy. Basically the only thing moving in mud with any reliability would be the panje horse and wagon.
janh
Posts: 1215
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:06 pm

RE: History: Horses in the Wehrmacht

Post by janh »

ORIGINAL: Shellshock
During the first months of 1942 some panzer divisions had as many as 2,000 Panje horses but hardly a single serviceable motor vehicle. For that reason they received the nickname "Panje divisions." This unexpected turn of events made the veterinarian the busiest man in any panzer division.

I recall seeing some photos of horses pulling the vehicles out of the mud during Typhoon -- could have been in one of Paul Carells book. He mentioned that horses were quite crucial during that period, not only for getting supply through the mud, and later the deep snow, but even for keeping the armor going... I am surprised at the number of horses the Germans fielded late in the war, though! Fortunately the Germans didn't use them in cavalry charges against armor, as the infamous polish cavalry.
User avatar
Shellshock
Posts: 573
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:23 pm
Location: U.S.

RE: History: Horses in the Wehrmacht

Post by Shellshock »

ORIGINAL: janh
I recall seeing some photos of horses pulling the vehicles out of the mud during Typhoon -- could have been in one of Paul Carells book. He mentioned that horses were quite crucial during that period, not only for getting supply through the mud, and later the deep snow, but even for keeping the armor going... I am surprised at the number of horses the Germans fielded late in the war, though! Fortunately the Germans didn't use them in cavalry charges against armor, as the infamous polish cavalry.

This picture always sums up what January 1942 on the Eastern Front must have been like for me.

Image
User avatar
56ajax
Posts: 2293
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:43 am
Location: Cairns, Australia

RE: History: Horses in the Wehrmacht

Post by 56ajax »

would explain why German Officer training in 44/45 still included horse riding (and down hill skiing and fine table manners); no wonder they lost...
Molotov : This we did not deserve.

Foch : This is not peace. This is a 20 year armistice.

C'est la guerre aérienne
User avatar
Muzrub
Posts: 717
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Australia, Queensland, Gold coast
Contact:

RE: History: Horses in the Wehrmacht

Post by Muzrub »

ORIGINAL: Shellshock

ORIGINAL: janh
I recall seeing some photos of horses pulling the vehicles out of the mud during Typhoon -- could have been in one of Paul Carells book. He mentioned that horses were quite crucial during that period, not only for getting supply through the mud, and later the deep snow, but even for keeping the armor going... I am surprised at the number of horses the Germans fielded late in the war, though! Fortunately the Germans didn't use them in cavalry charges against armor, as the infamous polish cavalry.

This picture always sums up what January 1942 on the Eastern Front must have been like for me.

Image


That's how Eastern Europe 2011 still is!

Harmlessly passing your time in the grassland away;
Only dimly aware of a certain unease in the air.
You better watch out,
There may be dogs about
I've looked over Iraq, and i have seen
Things are not what they seem.


Matrix Axis of Evil
Greyhunterlp
Posts: 371
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: The UK (wot wot ole bean)

RE: History: Horses in the Wehrmacht

Post by Greyhunterlp »

ORIGINAL: Muzrub

That's how Eastern Europe 2011 still is!

Including the German Soldiers?

"We will get to Moscow one day Hans!"
Where I Go, Chaos Follows
Cavalry Corp
Posts: 4263
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 5:28 pm
Location: Sampford Spiney Devon UK

RE: History: Horses in the Wehrmacht

Post by Cavalry Corp »

goodie , lets talk horses!!

Germany had the finest horses in the world. Gerrmany still has the finest horses in the world despite the Russians best efforts to eat the best lines...

I know because I have one, I bought near Munich in 2008 . Decended from the very best, his ancestors must have sadly seen action in Russia.



Image
Attachments
MerlotDit..Aug2008.jpg
MerlotDit..Aug2008.jpg (44.5 KiB) Viewed 649 times
Senno
Posts: 489
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:42 pm

RE: History: Horses in the Wehrmacht

Post by Senno »

ORIGINAL: Grey Hunter

ORIGINAL: Muzrub

That's how Eastern Europe 2011 still is!

Including the German Soldiers?

"We will get to Moscow one day Hans!"

LoL. That's quite the bad left turn in Albuquerque, eh...
Senno
Smirfy
Posts: 1057
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 8:24 pm

RE: History: Horses in the Wehrmacht

Post by Smirfy »

ORIGINAL: Klydon

ORIGINAL: Smirfy

Germany also had a shortage of manpower and a horse was too labour intensive and inefficent in capacity. The only advantages the horse had over a truck was in that first winter was the German soldiers could eat the horses.

The Germans may have been short on manpower, but they were also short on supply vehicles, prime movers for artillery and gas to move those vehicles. The horse helped a lot in all these areas and I don't really remember reading much on the Germans scaling back on using horses because of manpower issues. I also have a reference along the lines of what Shellshock mentioned with Panje divisions and the vet being very busy. Basically the only thing moving in mud with any reliability would be the panje horse and wagon.


Panzer Leader page 267
User avatar
Muzrub
Posts: 717
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Australia, Queensland, Gold coast
Contact:

RE: History: Horses in the Wehrmacht

Post by Muzrub »

ORIGINAL: Grey Hunter

ORIGINAL: Muzrub

That's how Eastern Europe 2011 still is!

Including the German Soldiers?

"We will get to Moscow one day Hans!"

"We will get to Moscow one day Hans!" or ?

LOL- there probably is some poor Hans pushing a cart through the Carpathians, even veterans need a hobby.
Harmlessly passing your time in the grassland away;
Only dimly aware of a certain unease in the air.
You better watch out,
There may be dogs about
I've looked over Iraq, and i have seen
Things are not what they seem.


Matrix Axis of Evil
User avatar
Tarhunnas
Posts: 2975
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 10:19 am
Location: Hex X37, Y15

RE: History: Horses in the Wehrmacht

Post by Tarhunnas »

Horses ae a lot more labor intensive than motor veichles, the require attention and shelter, they also require large amounts of fodder, much bulkier to transport than gasoline. Also they get ill and die, especially in field conditions. The German army lost roughly the same number of horses as men during the war. The German army in WW2 had about the same proportion of horses to men as Napoleons armies!

The only reason the Germans (and other european armies) used horses so extensively was that there were not enough motor veichles.
------------------------------
RTW3 Designer
User avatar
Tarhunnas
Posts: 2975
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 10:19 am
Location: Hex X37, Y15

RE: History: Horses in the Wehrmacht

Post by Tarhunnas »

..and I forgot to add, the Germans didn't have the gasoline for more motorized divisions!
------------------------------
RTW3 Designer
Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series”