Bring me the head of Diego Garcia...and the Mayor of Addu Atoll too!

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Reg
Posts: 2793
Joined: Fri May 26, 2000 8:00 am
Location: NSW, Australia

RE: Game theory and the Stasi

Post by Reg »


No, I don't see any problem with that at all......... [:(][:(][:(]

Cheers,
Reg.

(One day I will learn to spell - or check before posting....)
Uh oh, Firefox has a spell checker!! What excuse can I use now!!!
User avatar
sprior
Posts: 8294
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 11:38 pm
Location: Portsmouth, UK

RE: Game theory and the Stasi

Post by sprior »

Aha, but it could be we are smarter than they are ...

It could be... We're doomed aren't we?
"Grown ups are what's left when skool is finished."
"History started badly and hav been geting steadily worse."
- Nigel Molesworth.

Image
User avatar
Roger Neilson II
Posts: 1419
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 11:16 am
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne. England

RE: Game theory and the Stasi

Post by Roger Neilson II »

We are all doomed, but some are doomed faster than others.

Roger
Image
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Game theory and the Stasi

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: Roger Neilson II

We are all doomed, but some are doomed faster than others.

Roger

[:D] Shades of Animal Farm?
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Game theory and the Stasi

Post by Cap Mandrake »

Against all odds, Soryu is still claiming to be sunk. I just know she is going to break my heart.

Image
Attachments
untitled.jpg
untitled.jpg (29.65 KiB) Viewed 292 times
Image
User avatar
Roger Neilson II
Posts: 1419
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 11:16 am
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne. England

RE: Game theory and the Stasi

Post by Roger Neilson II »

Indeed, with S Beckett's view of life and death thrown in........

Roger
Image
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Game theory and the Stasi

Post by Cap Mandrake »

*******Analysis of Allied Fighter production October 42*********

Let's look at October 42 after P-40E production has stopped and the K model is in production and the P-38F/G is rolling off the lines.


P-39...............................25
Sea Hurricane................5
F4F-4.............................45
Hurricane IIc..................36
P-38F/G..........................60
P-43A[:(].........................12
KittyhawkIII...................12
P40K..............................65
Beaufighter Vc................6
Spitfire Vc......................18

---------------------------------

Total............................284


Now, this is likely a bit rosier than reality because I am sure there will be some restricted squadrons mopping up US production of P-38's to some degree and because it may be difficult to fully employ the RCAF because of restrictions as well.


Image
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Game theory and the Stasi

Post by Cap Mandrake »

I suppose someone is going to tell us that wee Jap dobber pilot traing can also match the Allies in Scenario 2???

And carrier production too???
Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: Game theory and the Stasi

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

I suppose someone is going to tell us that wee Jap dobber pilot traing can also match the Allies in Scenario 2???

And carrier production too???
Image
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Game theory and the Stasi

Post by Cap Mandrake »

Fighter inventory July 18, 1942

Somebody's cousin apparently has the contract for those crappy Fulmars. We are wallowing in Martlets too. Maybe they can get into the fight more. Perhaps we can sell some MiG's to Ecuador or something.

Image
Attachments
untitled.jpg
untitled.jpg (20.18 KiB) Viewed 292 times
Image
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Game theory and the Stasi

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

And carrier production too???

I think they get these in scenario 2:



Image
Attachments
BGLR.jpg
BGLR.jpg (473.37 KiB) Viewed 292 times
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Game theory and the Stasi

Post by Cap Mandrake »

And why are we wasting 30 P-40E's on the soldiers of Orange? Aren't they all POW's already?
Image
User avatar
Wirraway_Ace
Posts: 1509
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Austin / Brisbane

RE: Game theory and the Stasi

Post by Wirraway_Ace »

Yes and not quite yes. He gets plenty of decent pilots out of training and a few more CVs.

The basic truth is the air war in scenario two will not go like the real war. You will never achieve air supremacy and you will struggle with even achieving local air superiority. It will be a grind all the way to the home islands. No big deal as long as you adjust your expectations.

His Navy remains fragile however. Sink his ships! He can't replace them.
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Game theory and the Stasi

Post by Cap Mandrake »

ORIGINAL: Wirraway_Ace

Yes and not quite yes. He gets plenty of decent pilots out of training and a few more CVs.

The basic truth is the air war in scenario two will not go like the real war. You will never achieve air supremacy and you will struggle with even achieving local air superiority. It will be a grind all the way to the home islands. No big deal as long as you adjust your expectations.

His Navy remains fragile however. Sink his ships! He can't replace them.

Yes, it is beginning to look like the old strategy of achieve local air superiority, take the next island under air umbrella, build base...lather, rinse, repeat isn't going to work.
Image
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Game theory and the Stasi

Post by Cap Mandrake »

Better perhaps would be carrier engagements without substantial land based air.......in other words, the Central Pacific
Image
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Game theory and the Stasi

Post by Cap Mandrake »

ORIGINAL: sprior
Aha, but it could be we are smarter than they are ...

It could be... We're doomed aren't we?

We still might be better looking. [:D]
Image
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Game theory and the Stasi

Post by Cap Mandrake »

ORIGINAL: Roger Neilson II

We are all doomed, but some are doomed faster than others.

Roger

But I don't WANT to be doomed. I DON'T, I DON'T, I DON'T!
Image
User avatar
sprior
Posts: 8294
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 11:38 pm
Location: Portsmouth, UK

RE: Game theory and the Stasi

Post by sprior »

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake
ORIGINAL: sprior
Aha, but it could be we are smarter than they are ...

It could be... We're doomed aren't we?

We still might be better looking. [:D]

That goes without saying.
"Grown ups are what's left when skool is finished."
"History started badly and hav been geting steadily worse."
- Nigel Molesworth.

Image
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: Game theory and the Stasi

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: witpqs
ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

And carrier production too???

I think they get these in scenario 2:

Wrong empire, dude...

ETA: Puny earthlings...




Image
Attachments
IJNshipp..enario2.jpg
IJNshipp..enario2.jpg (612.78 KiB) Viewed 292 times
Image
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Game theory and the Stasi

Post by Cap Mandrake »

Admiral Lord SPrior;

1) We are going to need a "shedload" of fuel at Perth.

2) Indomitable has to go back in 4 days. Might as well save the Fleet Air Arm squadrons and bring them with you. One of the RN carriers in NZ lost her fighters in some dreadful oversight.

2) Dragon and Glasgow have to go back in 7 and 20 d respectively. They are both in TF 61 wherever that is.

3) You could get a few more transports by converting your RAF squadron to DC-3's. There are also 9 C-47's in inventory. You could start to fill out one of the understrength USAAF squdrons and use it.

4) All USN and RAN ships upgrades should be done within 3 weeks. I am sending New Mexico back to Pearl as she can't upgrade in theater. Pennsylvania, Idaho, Nevada, North Carolina and Repulse will all be ready if you go by sea.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”