Anybody want to comment on this unit?

Moderators: JAMiAM, ralphtricky
Post by larryfulkerson »

Post by Oberst_Klink »
Post by larryfulkerson »
Post by Oberst_Klink »
Post by larryfulkerson »
Actually, wikipedia says that this transporter vehicle has off-road capability but I like the idea of a penalty for off-primary-roads.ORIGINAL: Oberst_Klink
...naturally, only the primary roads, or a movement penalty if one uses secondary roads.
Good idea.......I like that.ORIGINAL: Oberst_Klink
I'd call it 'strategic' movement or similar.
Post by larryfulkerson »
We're saving it to surprise him on his birthday. Actually I don't think anybody has broached the subject with him about it. I'm wondering what he would have to say about it actually. I delagate YOU to ask him about it. LOL.ORIGINAL: 1_Lzard
What does Ralph say to this?
Post by larryfulkerson »
I agree that the coding of this could be opening a can of worms. Although, the code is in there already for trains so maybe it's a case of slightly modifying a cut and paste job?ORIGINAL: 1_Lzard
I was more in the mind to ask 'what does Ralph say to the CODING of this'..........
Post by Curtis Lemay »
Post by larryfulkerson »
Hey.........that's a great idea. Thanks.ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay
If you add enough trucks to a tank unit it can be upgraded from, say, Slow Motorized to Fast Motorized. I had always rationalized that by assuming just this sort of equipment. I assumed the trucks were carrying the tanks when behind the lines.
Return to “Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III”

