Spam-bots? Don't Answer... REPORT!

Gamers can also use this forum to chat about any game related subject, news, rumours etc.

Moderator: maddog986

E
Posts: 1247
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:14 am

Spam-bots? Don't Answer... REPORT!

Post by E »

It never ceases to amaze me how many people profess to be against spam-bots, but actually help their cause by bumping their posts back to the top of the forum. If you're really against spam, you might want to try being a part of the solution.

If you notice, there is a link at the bottom right of every post that allows you to "report" the message. One thing I've heard complaints about the reporting system is what the "reason" should be... I always use the same one (the first successful one I stumbled upon). Report it as "ADVERTISING," then in the space provided, just note it's a "spam-bot." It has worked every time for me (since I stumbled upon an acceptable "reason"). It occasionally takes up to a day and half, but it does work.

I cannot confirm or deny that Matrix is going to award a store discount coupon to the person who reports the most actual spam-bots by December 20'th of this year (with erroneous reports deducting from their total). That kind of announcement will have to come directly from Matrix in the future.
"Lose" is the opposite of "win." "Loose" is the opposite of "tight."

Friends Don't Let Friends Facebook.

Twitter is for... (wait for it!) ...Twits!
User avatar
jomni
Posts: 2827
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:31 am
Contact:

RE: Spam-bots? Don't Answer... REPORT!

Post by jomni »

And if they invade our legit threads like what some are doing?
E
Posts: 1247
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:14 am

RE: Spam-bots? Don't Answer... REPORT!

Post by E »

ORIGINAL: jomni

And if they invade our legit threads like what some are doing?

ORIGINAL: E

If you notice, there is a link at the bottom right of --->every post<--- that allows you to "report" the message.
"Lose" is the opposite of "win." "Loose" is the opposite of "tight."

Friends Don't Let Friends Facebook.

Twitter is for... (wait for it!) ...Twits!
Josh
Posts: 2568
Joined: Tue May 09, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Leeuwarden, Netherlands

RE: Spam-bots? Don't Answer... REPORT!

Post by Josh »

Cool thanks, I hope that works because these spammers are bugging the hell out of me [:@] ( the angry face isn't saying nearly enough how I hate that vermin)

/edit.
It should be made easier for regular members to report messages, it should be possible to report the spammer not just the message. Report spam, ban spammer, delete posts, done.
E
Posts: 1247
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:14 am

RE: Spam-bots? Don't Answer... REPORT!

Post by E »

ORIGINAL: Josh

Cool thanks, I hope that works because these spammers are bugging the hell out of me [:@] ( the angry face isn't saying nearly enough how I hate that vermin)

/edit.
It should be made easier for regular members to report messages, it should be possible to report the spammer not just the message. Report spam, ban spammer, delete posts, done.

I don't have a good answer for you on that, as I just did report #4 on spam-bot "gavinspike" (happily someone else did #3!), and I am a bit disappointed as I know I did reports #1 & #2, which were deleted. And yet the account was able to do #3 & 4 posts.
"Lose" is the opposite of "win." "Loose" is the opposite of "tight."

Friends Don't Let Friends Facebook.

Twitter is for... (wait for it!) ...Twits!
User avatar
jomni
Posts: 2827
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:31 am
Contact:

RE: Spam-bots? Don't Answer... REPORT!

Post by jomni »

@Josh
&nbsp;
There is a green button beside "buddy" to hide messages from a certain user.
E
Posts: 1247
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:14 am

RE: Spam-bots? Don't Answer... REPORT!

Post by E »

ORIGINAL: jomni
There is a green button beside "buddy" to hide messages from a certain user.

...which is best used for obnoxious regular posters, as all spam-bots eventually disappear (1-4 posts on average?). But the green button won't block the continuous stream of new spam-bots.
"Lose" is the opposite of "win." "Loose" is the opposite of "tight."

Friends Don't Let Friends Facebook.

Twitter is for... (wait for it!) ...Twits!
User avatar
Anthropoid
Posts: 3107
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 1:01 am
Location: Secret Underground Lair

RE: Spam-bots? Don't Answer... REPORT!

Post by Anthropoid »

ORIGINAL: E
. . . as all spam-bots eventually disappear (1-4 posts on average?). . . .

Which is why I find it more entertaining than anything else.
The x-ray is her siren song. My ship cannot resist her long. Nearer to my deadly goal. Until the black hole. Gains control...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkIIlkyZ ... playnext=3
E
Posts: 1247
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:14 am

RE: Spam-bots? Don't Answer... REPORT!

Post by E »

ORIGINAL: Anthropoid
Which is why I find it more entertaining than anything else.

You put forth a viable alternative! "Rude Ignore" does work much better than responding to the spam-bots and bouncing their posts back to the top of the forum!
"Lose" is the opposite of "win." "Loose" is the opposite of "tight."

Friends Don't Let Friends Facebook.

Twitter is for... (wait for it!) ...Twits!
User avatar
Anthropoid
Posts: 3107
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 1:01 am
Location: Secret Underground Lair

RE: Spam-bots? Don't Answer... REPORT!

Post by Anthropoid »

Meh. Not replying involves fewer key strokes = less "entertainment"
The x-ray is her siren song. My ship cannot resist her long. Nearer to my deadly goal. Until the black hole. Gains control...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkIIlkyZ ... playnext=3
User avatar
wodin
Posts: 10709
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 3:13 am
Location: England
Contact:

RE: Spam-bots? Don't Answer... REPORT!

Post by wodin »

every time I report it's already been done...
E
Posts: 1247
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:14 am

RE: Spam-bots? Don't Answer... REPORT!

Post by E »

ORIGINAL: Anthropoid

Meh. Not replying involves fewer key strokes = less "entertainment"

Yes, sadly many do like to help the spam-bots. Although some are just plain fooled by them.

ORIGINAL: wodin

every time I report it's already been done...

Logon earlier! *grin* Actually... until this thread was started, I've never run into a spam-bot post that had been previously reported. And I think that was because finding a "reason" for the report was next to impossible to get past the system, thereby frustrating any and all who tried to report the spam (but using "Advertising" works).
"Lose" is the opposite of "win." "Loose" is the opposite of "tight."

Friends Don't Let Friends Facebook.

Twitter is for... (wait for it!) ...Twits!
User avatar
Yogi the Great
Posts: 1949
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 1:28 pm
Location: Wisconsin

RE: Spam-bots? Don't Answer... REPORT!

Post by Yogi the Great »

ORIGINAL: E

And I think that was because finding a "reason" for the report was next to impossible to get past the system,

Seem to hear this alot but actually quite easy. For reason other just put "Post is spam" in narrative I usually put something like "Looks like Spam"

As far as adding to the thread, I think most do it for the fun of it. Little harm really. Bumping back to the top, well ok, but most uf us would never hit the link anyway. Some of the spam threads get quite entertaining.
Hooked Since AH Gettysburg
User avatar
carnifex
Posts: 1294
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 8:47 pm
Location: Latitude 40° 48' 43N Longtitude 74° 7' 29W

RE: Spam-bots? Don't Answer... REPORT!

Post by carnifex »

I ahve many job offers it is very safe and secure company totally legitimate and registered. We have mysterty shopper jobs we send you check you buy goods send to us find out check was fake on hook for the entire balance thanks for the goods. Sorry about last part I type things from my head you no read that ok ok oj? Your friend Aubokumo Xie.
User avatar
06 Maestro
Posts: 3997
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:50 pm
Location: Nevada, USA

RE: Spam-bots? Don't Answer... REPORT!

Post by 06 Maestro »

ORIGINAL: carnifex

I ahve many job offers it is very safe and secure company totally legitimate and registered. We have mysterty shopper jobs we send you check you buy goods send to us find out check was fake on hook for the entire balance thanks for the goods. Sorry about last part I type things from my head you no read that ok ok oj? Your friend Aubokumo Xie.

LOL
Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies.

Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
madgamer2
Posts: 1235
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 3:59 pm

RE: Spam-bots? Don't Answer... REPORT!

Post by madgamer2 »

WARNING: E is a spam-bot
If your not part of the solution
You are part of the problem
Phatguy
Posts: 1348
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 6:08 pm
Location: Buffalo,ny

RE: Spam-bots? Don't Answer... REPORT!

Post by Phatguy »

A satanic spam-bot...with 666 posts
My life is complete. 1000 Matrix posts.....
E
Posts: 1247
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:14 am

RE: Spam-bots? Don't Answer... REPORT!

Post by E »

ORIGINAL: apathetic lurker

A satanic spam-bot...with 666 posts
Thanks for your signature. I'll be seeing you... muwahaha!
"Lose" is the opposite of "win." "Loose" is the opposite of "tight."

Friends Don't Let Friends Facebook.

Twitter is for... (wait for it!) ...Twits!
E
Posts: 1247
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:14 am

RE: Spam-bots? Don't Answer... REPORT!

Post by E »

ORIGINAL: madgamer2

WARNING: E is a spam-bot
WARNING: MudGrungerToo is a virus!
"Lose" is the opposite of "win." "Loose" is the opposite of "tight."

Friends Don't Let Friends Facebook.

Twitter is for... (wait for it!) ...Twits!
User avatar
BAL
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2002 6:03 pm
Location: West of the Missouri

RE: Spam-bots? Don't Answer... REPORT!

Post by BAL »

ORIGINAL: E

It never ceases to amaze me how many people profess to be against spam-bots, but actually help their cause by bumping their posts back to the top of the forum. If you're really against spam, you might want to try being a part of the solution.

If you notice, there is a link at the bottom right of every post that allows you to "report" the message. One thing I've heard complaints about the reporting system is what the "reason" should be... I always use the same one (the first successful one I stumbled upon). Report it as "ADVERTISING," then in the space provided, just note it's a "spam-bot." It has worked every time for me (since I stumbled upon an acceptable "reason"). It occasionally takes up to a day and half, but it does work.

I cannot confirm or deny that Matrix is going to award a store discount coupon to the person who reports the most actual spam-bots by December 20'th of this year (with erroneous reports deducting from their total). That kind of announcement will have to come directly from Matrix in the future.


Spam is preferable to your tiresome pontificating. [>:]
I'll try being nicer if you try being less stupid. - anon
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”