Yamato and Musashi

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Shellshock
Posts: 571
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:23 pm
Location: U.S.

Yamato and Musashi

Post by Shellshock »

Always wondered why does the BB Yamato have the big mystique cult with the Japanese as opposed to her sister. Is it the name....being the first of her class?
User avatar
CyrusSpitama
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:36 am
Location: Naw'lins, Luzianna

RE: Yamato and Musashi

Post by CyrusSpitama »

From wikipedia and also verified elsewhere.
Yamato (大和) was originally the area around today's Sakurai City in Nara Prefecture of Japan. Later the term was used as the name of the province and also as an ancient name of Japan. The term was semantically extended to mean “Japan” or “Japanese” in general.

So you see, Yamato represents the people as a whole and is not just a ship.
"I'm sure the universe is full of intelligent life. It's just been too intelligent to come here." - Arthur C. Clarke
User avatar
Shellshock
Posts: 571
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:23 pm
Location: U.S.

RE: Yamato and Musashi

Post by Shellshock »

Okay....does sound like it comes down to the pedigree of name. [:)]
spence
Posts: 5421
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: Yamato and Musashi

Post by spence »

Interesting that the Germans (Hitler) renamed the Deutschland as the Lutzow for the specific reason that it would be unseemly for a ship bearing the name of the nation to be sunk.
User avatar
topeverest
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:47 am
Location: Houston, TX - USA

RE: Yamato and Musashi

Post by topeverest »

Go up against her or her sister in straIGHT UP surface combat, you will have healthy respect...very healthy
Andy M
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Yamato and Musashi

Post by Terminus »

If you believe that...[8|]
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
freeboy
Posts: 8969
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 9:33 am
Location: Colorado

RE: Yamato and Musashi

Post by freeboy »

well, when she was launched she was the ruler of the seas.. granted by 45 could use a technology refit... we will never know as surfase combat was not the norm for these massively wasteful, in hindsight, behemoths. So, back on track, she has the "cult" because she was first and in her day the greatest BB afloat
IMO
"Tanks forward"
User avatar
DivePac88
Posts: 3119
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:50 pm
Location: Somewhere in the South Pacific.

RE: Yamato and Musashi

Post by DivePac88 »

I've always wondered just how well Yamato would have been in a gunfight, as Her gunnery practise shoots were some of the worst in the IJN.
Image
When you see the Southern Cross, For the first time
You understand now, Why you came this way
Tiornu
Posts: 1126
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 7:59 pm

RE: Yamato and Musashi

Post by Tiornu »

Yamato's gunnery had some notable accomplishments at Samar, including the famous "puppy being smacked by a truck" hits on USS Johnston.
I wonder how the cult would be different if Yamato had gone down in Sibuyan Sea and Musashi had committed ritual suicide off Okinawa.
User avatar
decaro
Posts: 4004
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:05 pm
Location: Stratford, Connecticut
Contact:

RE: Yamato and Musashi

Post by decaro »

ORIGINAL: spence

Interesting that the Germans (Hitler) renamed the Deutschland as the Lutzow for the specific reason that it would be unseemly for a ship bearing the name of the nation to be sunk.

The Yamato had a few close calls because of some weak points in her armor; since the IJN could lose face if she was lost at sea, she spent a lot of time safely tucked away at Truk.
Stratford, Connecticut, U.S.A.[center]Image[/center]
[center]"The Angel of Okinawa"[/center]
Home of the Chance-Vought Corsair, F4U
The best fighter-bomber of World War II
User avatar
freeboy
Posts: 8969
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 9:33 am
Location: Colorado

RE: Yamato and Musashi

Post by freeboy »

just a note, from childhood
I always heard this; " Yamato was sunk after being attcked by hundreds of planes, taking dozens of hits etc etc.." basically givingthe impression that she would not have been sunk without being torpedoed numerous times ... for what its worth. again imo these ships, in hindsight for both US and Jap navies where terrible investments.
After all, which would you have one super BB or 5 cv's?
"Tanks forward"
Cyber Me
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:34 pm
Location: the Cloud

RE: Yamato and Musashi

Post by Cyber Me »

ORIGINAL: DivePac88

I've always wondered just how well Yamato would have been in a gunfight, as Her gunnery practise shoots were some of the worst in the IJN.

The Yamato's gunnery crew were mis-reading the calculation tables during her trials. It took some time before the problem was addressed- including returning the ship to the yards. (This is why the Yamato appears in 1942 instead of pre-war.) Once it was discovered the directors were so incompetent they were busted off the ship and a new gunnery crew was assigned. This solved the problem and I think the ship worked as normal.
Cyber Me
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:34 pm
Location: the Cloud

RE: Yamato and Musashi

Post by Cyber Me »

ORIGINAL: freeboy

just a note, from childhood
I always heard this; " Yamato was sunk after being attcked by hundreds of planes, taking dozens of hits etc etc.." basically givingthe impression that she would not have been sunk without being torpedoed numerous times ... for what its worth. again imo these ships, in hindsight for both US and Jap navies where terrible investments.
After all, which would you have one super BB or 5 cv's?

Every admiral dreams of having an unsinkable battleship. And the Yamato is probably as close to that as the Japanese could expect. A powerful surface force was seen as the only way to win the "decisive battle" that the Japanese doctrine. National pride also was built on the number of battleships you had in your fleet. I think these battleships were on the limit of the technical achievements and had to be constructed before the carriers took control of the oceans. Naval aviation grew from here for both sides could design better planes with advances in aero-engines. Until these improved planes could be made in numbers the battleship admirals held sway in all fleets.
User avatar
Shellshock
Posts: 571
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:23 pm
Location: U.S.

RE: Yamato and Musashi

Post by Shellshock »

ORIGINAL: Joe D.

The Yamato had a few close calls because of some weak points in her armor; since the IJN could lose face if she was lost at sea, she spent a lot of time safely tucked away at Truk.

Yeah....that swinging at anchor shed did at Truk always seemed like such a waste. Having built this paragon of naval surface supremacy, you get the sense that the Japanese were loathe to dent her paint in the common night fights of the Solomons. But given her astronomical fuel and unique ammunition requirements I can see why. Even for the US, committing the battleships South Dakota and Washington to a night action was a desperate gamble that involved risking the last heavy surface force in the Pacific in a way that was contrary to established doctrine and in a type of fighting that the Japanese had shown themselves to be masters.

User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: Yamato and Musashi

Post by crsutton »

ORIGINAL: Shellshock

ORIGINAL: Joe D.

The Yamato had a few close calls because of some weak points in her armor; since the IJN could lose face if she was lost at sea, she spent a lot of time safely tucked away at Truk.

Yeah....that swinging at anchor shed did at Truk always seemed like such a waste. Having built this paragon of naval surface supremacy, you get the sense that the Japanese were loathe to dent her paint in the common night fights of the Solomons. But given her astronomical fuel and unique ammunition requirements I can see why. Even for the US, committing the battleships South Dakota and Washington to a night action was a desperate gamble that involved risking the last heavy surface force in the Pacific in a way that was contrary to established doctrine and in a type of fighting that the Japanese had shown themselves to be masters.


I think that fuel supply was an issue as well.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
Tijanski
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 4:31 pm

RE: Yamato and Musashi

Post by Tijanski »

The people at combinedfleet.com have figured this out a long time ago. They look at details that people don't even know that exist. They look at guns and armor and how good it really was. And they look at fire control and protection and how good it really was. Maybe it was Yamato class because Yamato was first ship in the class. But it was not all the big deal that everbody thinks.
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Yamato and Musashi

Post by Terminus »

ORIGINAL: Tiornu

Yamato's gunnery had some notable accomplishments at Samar, including the famous "puppy being smacked by a truck" hits on USS Johnston.
I wonder how the cult would be different if Yamato had gone down in Sibuyan Sea and Musashi had committed ritual suicide off Okinawa.

Excuse me? "Notable"?

I think it's called "blind luck".
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
stuman
Posts: 3945
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 8:59 am
Location: Elvis' Hometown

RE: Yamato and Musashi

Post by stuman »

ORIGINAL: crsutton

ORIGINAL: Shellshock

ORIGINAL: Joe D.

The Yamato had a few close calls because of some weak points in her armor; since the IJN could lose face if she was lost at sea, she spent a lot of time safely tucked away at Truk.

Yeah....that swinging at anchor shed did at Truk always seemed like such a waste. Having built this paragon of naval surface supremacy, you get the sense that the Japanese were loathe to dent her paint in the common night fights of the Solomons. But given her astronomical fuel and unique ammunition requirements I can see why. Even for the US, committing the battleships South Dakota and Washington to a night action was a desperate gamble that involved risking the last heavy surface force in the Pacific in a way that was contrary to established doctrine and in a type of fighting that the Japanese had shown themselves to be masters.


I think that fuel supply was an issue as well.


I think she was afraid of PT 73.
" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley

Image
Tiornu
Posts: 1126
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 7:59 pm

RE: Yamato and Musashi

Post by Tiornu »

Excuse me? "Notable"? I think it's called "blind luck".
If you hit what you're aiming at, I don't know how much we can credit luck. I mean, luck is a factor in any such gunnery, but the main battery and secondaries hit the target within one minute of each other. Somebody must have done something right.
User avatar
Bradley7735
Posts: 2073
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 8:51 pm

RE: Yamato and Musashi

Post by Bradley7735 »

ORIGINAL: Tiornu

Yamato's gunnery had some notable accomplishments at Samar, including the famous "puppy being smacked by a truck" hits on USS Johnston.
I wonder how the cult would be different if Yamato had gone down in Sibuyan Sea and Musashi had committed ritual suicide off Okinawa.

I've always read that Johnston got hit by 14" shells. She continued to operate for quite a while after receiving the main battery BB hits (3 of them, I think). I wonder if she received 3 18" hits if she could actually continue to operate. I think it's amazing that she could operate after 14" hits anyway.

I suppose I'm confusing Johnston with Hoel. I wouldn't advise anyone to tell Tiornu that he's mistaken. But, everything I've read about the battle, Yamato was a non-factor, Kongo was the only one who hit anything, and Nagato tried to hit Taffy 2 most of the time. I don't remember the 4th BB.
The older I get, the better I was.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”