Ketza (Axis) vrs Fulkerson (CCCP) No commies!

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

User avatar
TulliusDetritus
Posts: 5581
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 1:49 am
Location: The Zone™

RE: Ketza (Axis) vrs Fulkerson (CCCP) No commies!

Post by TulliusDetritus »

In fact what's the Blitzkrieg? It's mobility, yes, but it's also a big concentration of forces (or fire) (the Panzer divisions) in x place.

In other words, I fight fire with fire.
"Hitler is a horrible sexual degenerate, a dangerous fool" - Mussolini, circa 1934
User avatar
Encircled
Posts: 2097
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Northern England

RE: Ketza (Axis) vrs Fulkerson (CCCP) No commies!

Post by Encircled »

Successive defensive lines are great, but you need the forces to do it.

Realistically, you are not going to manage that in '41

Checkerboard to slow them down, then swamp the front line and try to keep track of your opponenets Panzer and Motorised units.

Thats what I'm trying to do in my two games, with limited success

User avatar
Klydon
Posts: 2305
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 3:39 am

RE: Ketza (Axis) vrs Fulkerson (CCCP) No commies!

Post by Klydon »

I think the Russians grouping around the German armor is likely a good idea if the Germans have dispersed their armor out so it isn't that concentrated. I do also think it can be a very dangerous gambit to play against more concentrated German armor and you run the risk that if they gassed up, there is going to be a world of hurt coming. With enough armor concentrated, they can slice up a lot and have enough units to protect their flanks. Dispersed armor can't do that and can be cut off by a clever Russian.

In another way, the German armor is a big fish. When it is strong and full of fight, you set the drag down (checkerboard) and let him run a bit to wear himself out moving through enemy zocs and doing a lot of hasty attacks against the checkerboard. When it gets tired, you increase the drag and start to look to reel it in (clump more units around and look to cut off the armor).

Hopefully that makes some sense. [;)]
User avatar
Encircled
Posts: 2097
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Northern England

RE: Ketza (Axis) vrs Fulkerson (CCCP) No commies!

Post by Encircled »

Perfect sense!

If he doesn't move his armor for one turn, then the carpet wraps itself up, and becomes a very deep checkerboard*

*in theory!
User avatar
TulliusDetritus
Posts: 5581
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 1:49 am
Location: The Zone™

RE: Ketza (Axis) vrs Fulkerson (CCCP) No commies!

Post by TulliusDetritus »

Klydon, when I talk about concentration it's not necessarily everyone next to Panzers. It is NOT. It's everyone in the strategic area: Leningrad or Moscow approaches or the south. You are massively covering a LOT of hexes. I welcome the Panzers, even if they are concentrated. Action... reaction [:)]
"Hitler is a horrible sexual degenerate, a dangerous fool" - Mussolini, circa 1934
User avatar
Mynok
Posts: 12108
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 12:12 am
Contact:

RE: Ketza (Axis) vrs Fulkerson (CCCP) No commies!

Post by Mynok »


I smell Commies in here.  [:D]
"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown
User avatar
TulliusDetritus
Posts: 5581
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 1:49 am
Location: The Zone™

RE: Ketza (Axis) vrs Fulkerson (CCCP) No commies!

Post by TulliusDetritus »

ORIGINAL: Mynok


I smell Commies in here.  [:D]

Oops, true!
"Hitler is a horrible sexual degenerate, a dangerous fool" - Mussolini, circa 1934
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Ketza (Axis) vrs Fulkerson (CCCP) No commies!

Post by Ketza »

AGN - Dunno what he was thinking here but the HQ buildup payed off. The Panzer line is leaky but recon shows he doesnt have much around Leningrad except a lot of his better planes that he brought on this turn in the area. I was starting to think maybe he wasnt going to defend the palce but then why all the planes? I managed to trap Leningrads factories.




Image
Attachments
Larry4north.jpg
Larry4north.jpg (151.59 KiB) Viewed 422 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Ketza (Axis) vrs Fulkerson (CCCP) No commies!

Post by Ketza »

Turn 4 center - grabbed Vtebsk and HQ buildip was done for the large Pz corp left in 3rd Pz army. Pockets were eliminated and 2nd Pz drove to the river. 4th army had a delay but is starting to show up. With Leningrad doing well I have decided to commit 9th army to the Smolensk area and move 2nd army to the Odessa/Crimea area.



Image
Attachments
Larry4center.jpg
Larry4center.jpg (114.78 KiB) Viewed 422 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Ketza (Axis) vrs Fulkerson (CCCP) No commies!

Post by Ketza »

Turn 4 AGS - All pockets destroyed except some tough looking guys that can cause no harm so why waste the casualties. Some reorg done between 17th and 6th army. 1 Pz corp heads for Kiev and storms the place grabbing the factories. 2nd game in a row I have stormed it with an SS division. He is building a solid line behind the river. Thats where his leningrad defenders went no doubt as he is still checkerboarding the south like crazy.

I did screw up major however when a retreated Soviet misplaced the HQ of 1st Pz army. Its down near the Rumanian border!

Image
Attachments
Larry4south.jpg
Larry4south.jpg (125.21 KiB) Viewed 422 times
User avatar
Encircled
Posts: 2097
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Northern England

RE: Ketza (Axis) vrs Fulkerson (CCCP) No commies!

Post by Encircled »

Ouchski!

I don't think he will be doing that again, but its all part of the learning process

HQ build up is a real tool for the Germans in '41, and its very hard to counter this early
User avatar
Tarhunnas
Posts: 2997
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 10:19 am
Location: Hex X37, Y15

RE: Ketza (Axis) vrs Fulkerson (CCCP) No commies!

Post by Tarhunnas »

Thats pretty impressive cutting Leningrad off by turn 4! Nice maneuvering!
------------------------------
RTW3 Designer
squatter
Posts: 1040
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 5:13 pm

RE: Ketza (Axis) vrs Fulkerson (CCCP) No commies!

Post by squatter »

C'mon, there's no joy in watching someone publically eviscerate a guy who's still learning the game. It's over before it began.
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Ketza (Axis) vrs Fulkerson (CCCP) No commies!

Post by Ketza »

ORIGINAL: squatter

C'mon, there's no joy in watching someone publically eviscerate a guy who's still learning the game. It's over before it began.


Well I know Larry is an excellent gamer thats what of the reasons I started an AAR and chose to ask him for a game. Although he does seem to be making mistakes there is a chance he is actually following some sort of strategy that hasnt shown itself yet. His army has to be somewhere enmasse and I am sure to run into it eventually.

My theory at this point is he decided to not fight for Leningrad as he knew I was going to come for it hard if he read my other AAR. He also knows the strategic importance of the south and that is where his main resistance has been. He has been carefull to stay clear of large pockets and there is a wall of units on the Dnepr.

If things get too far out of hand I will stop the AAR but I do feel as a long term opponent he will stick to the game which is really the main thing I am looking for at this point. I am not a fan of the later war scenarios as they start in ways that I feel I can do better if I start the war historically.
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Ketza (Axis) vrs Fulkerson (CCCP) No commies!

Post by Ketza »

Turn 5 south start post recon -

He is pulling back the Zhotomir bulge and there are a few smaller pockets and remnants ov Lvow pocket. His forts along the river are 1-2 level. He is still checkerboarding towards the bend and Crimea but has somewhat pulled back to keep me from pocketing a sizeable force.

Image
Attachments
larry5startsouth.jpg
larry5startsouth.jpg (167.19 KiB) Viewed 422 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Ketza (Axis) vrs Fulkerson (CCCP) No commies!

Post by Ketza »

5 center start post recon -

Checkerboard from the river east. Panzers are low on fuel except the 3Pz divisions.



Image
Attachments
larry5startcenter.jpg
larry5startcenter.jpg (133.59 KiB) Viewed 422 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Ketza (Axis) vrs Fulkerson (CCCP) No commies!

Post by Ketza »

5 North post recon -

Only a few divisions have fuel that were air dropped. Rest of 4th Pz is in bad shape fuel wise. Corridor should hold and will be widened.



Image
Attachments
larry5startnorth.jpg
larry5startnorth.jpg (165.81 KiB) Viewed 422 times
User avatar
Klydon
Posts: 2305
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 3:39 am

RE: Ketza (Axis) vrs Fulkerson (CCCP) No commies!

Post by Klydon »

Knowing when to gas the panzers is one of the biggest learning curves for the Germans in the 41 campaign I think. Done properly, it can be ugly for the Russians. 
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Ketza (Axis) vrs Fulkerson (CCCP) No commies!

Post by Ketza »

AGS turn 5 final - bridgehead over the Dnepr at Kiev. Unable to pocket whats left of Zhitomir bulge not enough mps.

Image
Attachments
larry5southfinal.jpg
larry5southfinal.jpg (161.45 KiB) Viewed 422 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Ketza (Axis) vrs Fulkerson (CCCP) No commies!

Post by Ketza »

AGC 5 final - Not much Panzers soaking up fuel infantry on the way and bridgeheads over the Dnepr.



Image
Attachments
larry5centerfinal.jpg
larry5centerfinal.jpg (103.8 KiB) Viewed 422 times
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”