Not all railwyas are created equal

Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: The German-Soviet War 1941-1945 is a turn-based World War II strategy game stretching across the entire Eastern Front. Gamers can engage in an epic campaign, including division-sized battles with realistic and historical terrain, weather, orders of battle, logistics and combat results.

The critically and fan-acclaimed Eastern Front mega-game Gary Grigsby’s War in the East just got bigger and better with Gary Grigsby’s War in the East: Don to the Danube! This expansion to the award-winning War in the East comes with a wide array of later war scenarios ranging from short but intense 6 turn bouts like the Battle for Kharkov (1942) to immense 37-turn engagements taking place across multiple nations like Drama on the Danube (Summer 1944 – Spring 1945).

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21, elmo3

marty_01
Posts: 288
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 2:16 pm

RE: Not all railwyas are created equal

Post by marty_01 »

ORIGINAL: 76mm

As to shipping railcars and locomotives by sea: I haven't done any research on this point, but given that the Sovs moved entire factories beyond the Urals, I don't think it would have been beyond them to ship a couple of locomotives to a major port, even if they had to disassemble them.

The USA and UK shipped a fair number of locomotives and rolling stock to the Soviet Union as part of lend lease. I just saw a figure for this in one of the books I am reading. Although it just occured to me that it wasnt explained how the materials were adapted to Soviet gauge sizes. Perhaps they were manufactured based on specifications for Soviet gauge track.

Complete aside, but the same source indicated German locomotives were not insulted sufficiently to deal with the uber cold Russian winters and had issues with maintaining steam pressure as a result. Reduce German rail movement rates during blizzard turns [:)]
marty_01
Posts: 288
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 2:16 pm

RE: Not all railwyas are created equal

Post by marty_01 »

ORIGINAL: Tarhunnas

BTW here is a railway map of the Soviet Union during WW2. The colours only show the different railway administrative regions, so you can ignore those. The interesting thing is it shows which lines are single and which are double tracked. I think it clearly shows the importance of Moscow as a hub. The radial lines are mostly single track. Especially communications to the north-west will be very difficult if Moscow is lost. The importance of the Rostov - Voronezh - Moscow line also stands out.

very nice map. Thanks for posting it.
1jasonoz
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 5:54 am

RE: Not all railwyas are created equal

Post by 1jasonoz »

I am playing the 42-45 game and have captured Moscow and Leningrad both by June of 43. I am at the mid april 1944 turn, with 272 victory points and am currently East of Moscow by about 15 hexes. My forces are about 4.3 million, with 5000 AFV's (including Axis allies), against 5.5 million Soviets with 9000 AFV's.

My bit problem is my rail lines have been all the way along the soveit border with Poland, and Romania. They have been cut for about 4 turns with no rail repair units going to fix them, and I have approximatley 400,000 replacements sitting in the manpower pool waiting to re-enforce my units, but they can't as the rail lines are cut!!

How can I get my rail lines fixed and get the the supplies and manpower to my units!!!
User avatar
Panama
Posts: 1362
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:48 pm

RE: Not all railwyas are created equal

Post by Panama »

Nice map Tarhunnas.
User avatar
sillyflower
Posts: 3509
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 4:39 pm
Location: Back in Blighty

RE: Not all railwyas are created equal

Post by sillyflower »

ORIGINAL: Panama

There is no doubt the Soviets were successful in moving large numbers of troops and supplies during the war. The problem is how extensive the rail net is in the game. There should be no bridge over the Volga at Stalingrad. Many of the rails portrayed on the map were practically useless. In 1943 a single rail led from Kastornoe to Kursk. Some track along this line was so poor that horses pulled the freight cars because the rails could not support a locomotive. That was not unusual for much of the single track lines. In the game you can just choo choo along this rail with no problems.

Much of the rail in the Soviet Union used dirt and sand for ballast and there were no tie plates holding the rail to the ties. They simple drove the spikes into the ties. If any of you know anything about rail then you know dirt and sand provide no drainage and do a very poor job of distributing weight over the rail. Lack of plates also creates problems. All of this ends up with spikes pulled out of rails, rapid rotting of ties and track failure. Trains have to move much slower and stop more frequently for derailment. Weight of cars and locomotives become limited.

No one has ever bothered to research the state of the different railroad lines depicted in the game. There are so many misrepresentations of the rail net in the game as to be ludicrous. If you've played as the Soviet you know how important rail movement is. That is why it should be modeled properly.

+1.

It is a stain on the souls of the design team especially Pavel from whom we have learned to expect so much better.

The proper solution is to have every hexside with a rail line to have its own MP vaue to reflect this, each of which then needs to be modified for various weather conditions as that effect will also differ depending on railway type /quality in each hex.

Certain vehicles should be prevented from using certain types of railhex ( car weight restrictions) which would stop units with heavy tanks from being railed willy-nilly.

I think, however that the values above should be fixed because to make in-game adjustments to allow for effects of wear and tear based on levels use use would just be over complicating things unecessarily but I do accept the rights of others to disagree with me on this.

I dream that Sid Meier could be persuaded to do a suitable mod.
web exchange

Post: I am always fearful that when I put this game down on the table and people see the box-art they will think I am some kind of neo-Nazi

Reply: They already know you're a gamer. What other shame can possibly compare?
User avatar
Panama
Posts: 1362
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:48 pm

RE: Not all railwyas are created equal

Post by Panama »

Pavel has done an excellent job. The entire design team has. There are just too many rail lines. Remove some of the minor ones.
User avatar
sillyflower
Posts: 3509
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 4:39 pm
Location: Back in Blighty

RE: Not all railwyas are created equal

Post by sillyflower »

ORIGINAL: Panama

Pavel has done an excellent job. The entire design team has.

I know. It's called irony.
web exchange

Post: I am always fearful that when I put this game down on the table and people see the box-art they will think I am some kind of neo-Nazi

Reply: They already know you're a gamer. What other shame can possibly compare?
Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series”