Replacement aircraft to carrier groups

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

vinnie71
Posts: 976
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 7:32 am

Replacement aircraft to carrier groups

Post by vinnie71 »

Hi

Can anyone tell me how to get replacement aircraft to shipborne groups form the CVEs with replacement groups?

Thanks in advance!
beppi
Posts: 382
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 5:23 am
Location: Austria

RE: Replacement aircraft to carrier groups

Post by beppi »

ORIGINAL: Offworlder

Hi

Can anyone tell me how to get replacement aircraft to shipborne groups form the CVEs with replacement groups?

Thanks in advance!

Put the CVEs with the replacement groups into an replenishment TF. The CVEs with the replacement groups should not have more than 2x the capacity as planes. Then if the replenishment TF is in normal(extended ??, with droptanks, double the normal ??) range each turn automatic replacement planes and pilots are flown form the replenishment TF to your other groups which need replacements.
vinnie71
Posts: 976
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 7:32 am

RE: Replacement aircraft to carrier groups

Post by vinnie71 »

thanks. Now I see where I got it wrong. I kept the CVE's in escort mode.
Numdydar
Posts: 3283
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:56 pm

RE: Replacement aircraft to carrier groups

Post by Numdydar »

Can any AGs be used or do they have to specificly say replenishment AGs?
Rainer
Posts: 1210
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2000 10:00 am
Location: Neuching, Bavaria, Germany

RE: Replacement aircraft to carrier groups

Post by Rainer »

Be aware that the groups to supply the replacements have to be Replenishment Groups (they have VRF as a designator - say VRF-7B).
Regular fighting groups do not provide replacements, not even if they are stationed on a CVE which is part of a replenishment TF.
In other words - a CVE with regular fighting groups (say VC(F)-33 Wildcats stationed on CVE Anzio) may be included in a Replenishment TF in order to protect against air attack. The Replenishment groups (say VRF-2F stationed on CVE Altamaha) will not repeat not provide air cover (neither will VRF TBs or DBs ever attack).
WitP/AE
1.7.11.26b
Data base changes by Andy Mac October 16, 2012
Scen #1 Allied vs AI Level Hard Daily Turns
Art Mods by TomLabel and Reg
Topo Map by chemkid

WitW / Torch
1.01.37 - 1.01.44 beta
User avatar
ilovestrategy
Posts: 3614
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:41 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

RE: Replacement aircraft to carrier groups

Post by ilovestrategy »

How were they replaced in real life? Did pilots fly them off of a smaller carrier from the States to land on their designated fleet carrier? Or did the fleet carrier go to a base for it's new planes?
After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!
Image
Mac Linehan
Posts: 1518
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 9:08 pm
Location: Denver Colorado

RE: Replacement aircraft to carrier groups

Post by Mac Linehan »

Offworlder -

A remarkable coincidence; I was just about to do a CVE replenishment search. Excellent question.

beppi, Rainer -

A very exact response; am now very clear on the what and how to do it.

My appreciation, Gents.

Mac
LAV-25 2147
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10918
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Replacement aircraft to carrier groups

Post by PaxMondo »

So, this only works for allies ... IJ does not have CVE replenishment?
Pax
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: Replacement aircraft to carrier groups

Post by crsutton »

No, it does not work for the Japanese as far as I know. It has to be a special Allied squadron,located on an CVE, in a replenishment TF, within range.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
goatan
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 12:36 pm

RE: Replacement aircraft to carrier groups

Post by goatan »

It has to be a special Allied squadron,
This is something i never knew could be done. in what way does the squadron have to be special or does that just mean carrier capable?
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10918
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Replacement aircraft to carrier groups

Post by PaxMondo »

see above by rainer.... VMF type ...
Pax
Schanilec
Posts: 4038
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Grand Forks, ND

RE: Replacement aircraft to carrier groups

Post by Schanilec »

Similar type problem. Didn't want start a new thread. 10 July 1942 - I have the Enterprise and Yorktown at Pearl, they need their air groups replensihed. How long should this take? The fighter groups are very much lacking 1 to 3 planes on each carrier. They've been in port for about a month. I had to keep the Hornet (13 F4F's) in theatre (Coarl Sea) with the Wasp (full strength). The Hornet needs refitting but can't send her back until Enterprise and Yorktown get their air groups back to full strength. Saratoga is out for another 200 days. Lexington is gone. Should I disband some Marine fighter groups? Is there a way to train carrier groups? Really would like to get those carriers back into the fight. I've attrited the Japanese carrier air groups pretty good. Time is ripe to get at them and take some sort of offensive. Milne Bay, Guadalcanal, Funafuti, Baker Island, strengthen Port Morseby...
Your help would greatly help the war effort.
 
Thanks,
 
Schani 
This is one Czech that doesn't bounce.
beppi
Posts: 382
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 5:23 am
Location: Austria

RE: Replacement aircraft to carrier groups

Post by beppi »

ORIGINAL: Schanilec

Similar type problem. Didn't want start a new thread. 10 July 1942 - I have the Enterprise and Yorktown at Pearl, they need their air groups replensihed. How long should this take? The fighter groups are very much lacking 1 to 3 planes on each carrier. They've been in port for about a month. I had to keep the Hornet (13 F4F's) in theatre (Coarl Sea) with the Wasp (full strength). The Hornet needs refitting but can't send her back until Enterprise and Yorktown get their air groups back to full strength. Saratoga is out for another 200 days. Lexington is gone. Should I disband some Marine fighter groups? Is there a way to train carrier groups? Really would like to get those carriers back into the fight. I've attrited the Japanese carrier air groups pretty good. Time is ripe to get at them and take some sort of offensive. Milne Bay, Guadalcanal, Funafuti, Baker Island, strengthen Port Morseby...
Your help would greatly help the war effort.

Thanks,

Schani 

If you carriers are at Pearl you just need to turn on the replacements. Replenishment is a feature which allows the allied player to fill up his squads while his fleet is at sea. As long as you are at a base use replacements.

If your replacement pool is empty, either you can downgrade some other squadrons (land based preferred) to an older plane type if you have PDU on or just disband a squadron (not the best option) or just wait until some replacements come online.
Schanilec
Posts: 4038
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Grand Forks, ND

RE: Replacement aircraft to carrier groups

Post by Schanilec »

Thanks.
 Replacements is on. Replacement pool looks slim. Downgrade looks to be the best option.
So when does the industrial might kick in and fills the replacement pool with a horn of plenty?
This is one Czech that doesn't bounce.
User avatar
JohnDillworth
Posts: 3104
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:22 pm

RE: Replacement aircraft to carrier groups

Post by JohnDillworth »

So when does the industrial might kick in and fills the replacement pool with a horn of plenty?
Not in 1942. If your carriers have been busy SBD's and Wildcats will be scarce. You will start to get enough Avengers but the torpedoes don't work so whats the point?
Remember, in real life the Allies were down 2 carriers at this point (soon to be 4) so there were more aircraft to go around. Best to downgrade the land based squadrons. Make sure the model numbers are exactly the same. There are a few different Wildcat types, you probably need F4F's.
Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly
Schanilec
Posts: 4038
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Grand Forks, ND

RE: Replacement aircraft to carrier groups

Post by Schanilec »

I'll just try and make due with what I have and can get. With plenty of land based aircraft I'll keep the carriers under their umbrella for the time being. Port Morseby seems to be where I'll parry with the IJN.
 
Thanks all.
 
Schani
This is one Czech that doesn't bounce.
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: Replacement aircraft to carrier groups

Post by crsutton »

Yep, you really have to be very stingy with your carrier aircraft until mid 1943 (and then all of a sudden you will be swimming in them). One major carrier action and you might be out of action for months for lack of replacments. The tendency is to expand and try to fill up all your squadrons-espeically the Marine LBA squadrons and get them into the fight. However, this just is not sustainable and you have to resist filling up your marine squadrons until you have built a solid reserve for your carriers.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12463
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Replacement aircraft to carrier groups

Post by michaelm75au »

There is setting for air groups to indicate that they are classed as replenishment groups - the VR name or 'wing' size has not been the criteria for AE as it might have been with stock WITP.

There is no reason why Japanese groups can't be created with that setting on also.
Michael
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10918
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Replacement aircraft to carrier groups

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: michaelm

There is setting for air groups to indicate that they are classed as replenishment groups - the VR name or 'wing' size has not been the criteria for AE as it might have been with stock WITP.

There is no reason why Japanese groups can't be created with that setting on also.
Michael,

Thanks, great news for modders. But the stock scenarios do not have this enabled, correct?
Pax
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12463
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Replacement aircraft to carrier groups

Post by michaelm75au »

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

ORIGINAL: michaelm

There is setting for air groups to indicate that they are classed as replenishment groups - the VR name or 'wing' size has not been the criteria for AE as it might have been with stock WITP.

There is no reason why Japanese groups can't be created with that setting on also.
Michael,

Thanks, great news for modders. But the stock scenarios do not have this enabled, correct?
Correct.
Michael
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”