ORIGINAL: Tarhunnas
Losses after turn 17. Just over 3 million (I made some unnecessary attacks to bring it over 3 mil [:D])
There are no unnecessary attacks! If you have the chance to hurt the enemy, then hurt him!
[:)]
I'm not sure how well that theory works in reality, but its pretty sound in the game.
Who says you can't attack in mud?
I do it quite a bit actually. Always as a planned attack (not Hasty), and usually with as many units as I can line up. I look at their fort level, terrain, and supply, and then at the relative health of my own unit(s) - combat ready % and supply - and if it looks good, go after vulnerable units. I've even attacked some stronger units with larger combinations of troops. About the only thing I'm leary of in mud is high forts and attacking across a river (although I have on occassion, with adequate numbers).
Its worked quite well for me actually, sometimes getting a rout with lots of enemy casualties with few (sometimes none!) to me.
Comment: In my view, it is not really realistic that players should have a complete picture of the other sides recon flights. Perhaps there should be a chance of 30% or so to detect enemy recon flights?
As the Germans I find you have so much recon ability I start at one end of the front and proceed to the other surveying the front line- typically one hex behind the units in front - and looking around randomly in the backfield. I specifically recon airfields if I'm in the mood for some bombing, but as I do that immediately it wouldn't make any difference.
The AI doesn't care, but against a human knowing where I'm looking would be nearly useless.















