ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]
[X(][X(][X(][X(][X(][X(][X(][X(]
[:-][:-][:-][:-][:-][:-]
I just don't know what else to say about this topic and the comments thus far.
And you were the one who started talking about women[;)]
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]
[X(][X(][X(][X(][X(][X(][X(][X(]
[:-][:-][:-][:-][:-][:-]
I just don't know what else to say about this topic and the comments thus far.


ORIGINAL: GreyJoy
...i was reading back this AAR when Rader landed in India...wow...seems like a century ago!...however, i was considering the options he had...really think that if he had marched all the way to Dehli and Northern India, landing at the same time at Karachi with the KB in cover...well...there would have been no other options for me rather than a slow and painfull capitulation...at that time i barely have 2500 AVs in the whole India...most of them retreating towards Karachi...with no air cover...no forts to hide beyond...with the KB sitting in front of Karachi forbidding any reinforcement from Aden and with those tank armies ourflanking my poor battered divisions...well it would have been a massacre
ORIGINAL: crsutton
Naturally hairy women aside, I just wanted to let you know that I have been following but not commented because you are getting good advice (and plenty of it from a lot of players). Just let me say that considering your opponent's skill level, you are doing a great job. I concur with your stable of advisers in that Karachi is pretty safe and you need to be really thinking about hitting him in all the places that he is weak. It is unfortunate that he will have masses of freed up China troops but I am sure you will see many opportunities.
In addition, the advice to advance in the Solomons was very sound. You can leap frog bases and do not have to risk carriers there. Plus, invading atolls is very dangerous without LSTs, APAs, and AKA type ships that you won't have until mid 1943.
A comment about air power in scen #2. Rader is losing heavily but I know for a fact that a good Japanese player who knows production well can produce a mountain load of aircraft and trained pilots in scen #2. My campaign is nearing the end of 1943 and I have destroyed close to 20,000 Japanese airframes while losing about 13-14,000 myself. Yet, I see that I have not made a dent in the power of the Japanese air force. Not to mention that my skilled opponent is already producing every Japanese second generation fighter (including the frank) by 12/43. Rader has a plan and I don't think his air losses to date will be an issue for him. You will just be blown away by his ability to recover from his losses, while you will have to literally watch every aircraft to keep you squadrons intact. Your squadrons may be full but you will start getting a lot of new squadrons with no airplanes in them and none in your pools to fill them out. This will actually hurt you as squadrons with no planes can only train pilots very slowly. So be wary. I think grinding down the Allied air force in 1942 and early 1943 is a very viable Japanese option in scen #2.
Also, you will be amazed how powerful your tank units become once they have filled out with good tanks. (and have some air protection) Even a single tank regiment can hold off a Japanese division once the grants, lees and shermans start to arrive. I would not commit a lot of tank units to the defense of Karachi but save them for your counter offensive. Since he is not really moving into OZ, I would start shipping virtually all of my spare US, and Australian tank units for a counter invasion somewhere in India (or anywhere) when the time is right. There really are only two places in the Pacific where tank units can totally dominate-Australia and India. Use them in India and use them all and you can ruin his life. You have an a Australian cavalry brigade that upgrades to medium tanks. This actually becomes one of the most powerful units in the game. Buy it and all mobile Australian units out that do not have to withdraw. Pull every American Army tank unit out of the Pacific (leave the Marine units) and every American tank destroyer unit as well. If his carriers are out of the Indian ocean then a gradual conservative advance towards Rabaul will keep him very busy while you begin moving units to the SE Asia theater for a serious counter blow. Your armor is the key. Bring it but bring it all. His total commitment to India leaves you many options for a counter blow to his flank. It could be India proper, Burma or even Sumatra, but I think that your armor can turn India into a killing field. It is just perfect tank terrain.
You are doing well keeping the pressure on in the Pacific. Just do not get "too" bold as in scenario #2 not only does he get a tremendous AF but his carrier force can advance rapidly as well. I am pretty sure the Japanese player can have both Taiho class carriers (Shinano comes on as a Taiho in #2) and three or four Unryus (I believe he gets extras) by early 1944. Not to mention that Judys and Jills will come much earlier. The Japanese player can mount powerful counter-attacks as a result. Good hunting.

So far no-one has attempted the optimal strategic approach to India. Pushing slowly north and allowing the Allies to retreat into Festung Karachi isn't really optimal.
At the end of the turn we count 128 enemy planes shot down, against only 22 of ours in India...but those 22 are priceless while he has tons of everything

ORIGINAL: wpurdom
At the end of the turn we count 128 enemy planes shot down, against only 22 of ours in India...but those 22 are priceless while he has tons of everything
Greyjoy, you have an incredibly pessimistic view of your air battles. Only with Nemo have I seen the sort of favorable ratios you are getting at this stage. To get them in a standup fight instead of hit and run is incredible.
You're minimizing the effect of all these victories on the pilots. Between the ratios of losses and the fact that the fighter dogfights are over your city, you have to be winning substantially on first equalizing and now probably heading towards pilot skill superiority. Even if he can initially sustain the ratio of airframe losses, I don't see how the pilot ratio in losses can be sustained when you turn your 70's skill/experience level into 80's and he turns his 70's into dead.
That's what i've been hoping for...he must have lost 2/3000 pilots by now over karachi...but i cannot see any decrease of his overall performances...
At the end of the turn we count 128 enemy planes shot down, against only 22 of ours in India...but those 22 are priceless while he has tons of everything
ORIGINAL: wpurdom
At the end of the turn we count 128 enemy planes shot down, against only 22 of ours in India...but those 22 are priceless while he has tons of everything
Greyjoy, you have an incredibly pessimistic view of your air battles. Only with Nemo have I seen the sort of favorable ratios you are getting at this stage. To get them in a standup fight instead of hit and run is incredible.
You're minimizing the effect of all these victories on the pilots. Between the ratios of losses and the fact that the fighter dogfights are over your city, you have to be winning substantially on first equalizing and now probably heading towards pilot skill superiority. Even if he can initially sustain the ratio of airframe losses, I don't see how the pilot ratio in losses can be sustained when you turn your 70's skill/experience level into 80's and he turns his 70's into dead.
ORIGINAL: wpurdom
That's what i've been hoping for...he must have lost 2/3000 pilots by now over karachi...but i cannot see any decrease of his overall performances...
At the end of the turn we count 128 enemy planes shot down, against only 22 of ours in India...but those 22 are priceless while he has tons of everything
Just how bad does he have to do for you to see a decline in performance?