Defender of the Revolution: Q-Ball v Tarhunnas

[BletchleyGeek]

ORIGINAL: Ketza

ORIGINAL: Flaviusx
I dislike anything that mixes forts and APs. I think this game relies too much as it is on APs to solve everything, and this just leads to a lot of accounting trickery with APs.

There's got to be a better way than that.

I think the AP system has a lot of potential to make the game better.

I look at APs as a sort of national "logistics pool". You could potentially give the players a lot of flexibility by using them for various things to make the game more interesting. You can also utilize them in a system that restricts players from overdoing things that work too well. This is done with HQ buildups and it works fine in its latest variation in my opinion. To me fort construction after level 2 should fall into this category. I think its much more realistic and will make the game more interesting if both sides have to decide where the forts go and how much effort will be put into them. Your not taking them away your just making players invest something into them other then a few brigades out of the line for awhile.

Rather than AP's, I would set limits to the reachable Fortification level depending on the construction value of the units in the hex. SU's would only speed up the process, but not count towards this limit. Same thing for keeping the forts: you need some minimum level of construction points in the hex to avoid it to decay.

My guess is that someone has already thought of something like this.

[Flaviusx]

I've suggested decay mechanisms, yes. With decay penalties increasing dramatically as you get farther away from the front.

I've even suggested placing hard caps on fort levels, again depending on distance from the front. So you cannot just drop a 4 strength fort line 10 hexes in the rear.

These would be far easier from an adminsitrative standpoint than APs. APs get gamed, and the more duties get offloaded on APs, the more they get gamed.

[BletchleyGeek]

ORIGINAL: Flaviusx
I've suggested decay mechanisms, yes. With decay penalties increasing dramatically as you get farther away from the front.

I've even suggested placing hard caps on fort levels, again depending on distance from the front. So you cannot just drop a 4 strength fort line 10 hexes in the rear.

These would be far easier from an adminsitrative standpoint than APs. APs get gamed, and the more duties get offloaded on APs, the more they get gamed.

Tying fort cap and decay to the number of construction points in hex would account for distance from the front in an indirect way. Say you need to stack the equivalent of 3 rifle divisions to reach level 2. No level 4 lines 10 hexes in the rear, and it wouldn't be very intelligent to pile up 45 divisionsto get a 15-hex line 10 hexes in the rear just for the sake of it - such an amount of force would be possibly be needed at the front, or elsewhere.

However, this would totally gimp Germany in 1943. No forts, no chance of stopping - or at least damaging - the incoming blows. A possible counter for this could be to dramatically increase attacker casualties unless a certain ratio between fort level (defender) and engineer support level (attacker) is met. Something like the "extra free shots on attacking russians" the axis get. Perhaps this is already accounted for in the tactical combat simulation model, I can't say.

A global element is also missing. Hard caps/level decay linked to the amount of construction points in the hex doesn't introduce any kind of global limiting factor. One option would be to impose a "hard" limiting factor, a "build" pool very much like the motor pool is regarding logistics and general combat efficiency, which would influence how fast can forts be improved or improved at all. But this mechanism would probably add a lot of complexity to logistics phase computation and, more grievously, the player wouldn't have control over what hexes get build first (which is of the utmost importance).

An option would be to make FZ's the key for achieving really high fort levels (3, 4, 5). This would require AP expenditure, but one which I don't think it would be easy to game away. These units would tie TOE elements, vehicles and supplies for extended periods of time. If want to build you have to concentrate your forces and/or tie substantial amounts of resources to the land.

[Ketza]

Bletchley is right on the money.

BTW sorry to hijack the AAR. [:(]

[BletchleyGeek]

ORIGINAL: Ketza

Bletchley is right on the money.

BTW sorry to hijack the AAR. [:(]

I think this is the second time I contribute to partially derail a Q-Ball AAR. Sorry Q-Ball [&o]

[Lieste]

AP getting 'gamed' is a problem where they are used as one time 'build-points' or transfer points (and these have high values).

What happens though if expenditure of AP related more to the administration costs of operating your armies - so there is a cost for recruiting new units, training them, moving them, supporting them with new equipment, ammunition, incorporating them into mission plans, artillery fire plans, providing equipment and supplies for fortification (mines, wire, concrete etc).

So AP expenditures are highest when the army is large, and less are left for building new units or doing interesting things with large fortified zones. OTOH, when the Army is hit hard, the costs of running it are lower, leaving more for new unit creation, or digging complex forts.

[Q-Ball]

Hijack away, it's fine....a good debate.

July, 1942:

Well, if the Germans are going to sit, we will do something, just to make it interesting

Kliment's Revenge:

We are launching a general offensive against the Finnish positions west of Cherepovets. I have transferred 3rd Shock up there, plus Cavalry, Guards, and Tanks, and we are going to make attacks toward the West. I am still transferring forces, but first attacks pushed back 2 hexes.

I don't expect huge progress. I expect to accomplish the following:

1. Bleed the Finns. The Finnish Army gets almost no replacements. I want to bleed them down further.
2. Force the Germans to take over part of that sector, and stretch them out

If Tarhunnas really is done for the Summer, he probably should transfer 2 German Corps up there, and send the Finns back to Finland for the rest of the year. They probably need to recover morale, and stay out of attrition, and they can get some strength back for 43-44, when they will really need it.

Leader Loss: My first significant Leader Loss: Vasilevsky is KIA. [:(] I guess Boris will be on the job at STAVKA for the rest of the war.

[Klydon]

I started yet another fort thread in general to sort of try to move the conversation there.

Interesting move Q-Ball as far as against the Finns. I would also think beating the crap out of the other Axis allies would be helpful as well in accomplishing the same thing.

[Q-Ball]

ORIGINAL: Klydon

I started yet another fort thread in general to sort of try to move the conversation there.

Interesting move Q-Ball as far as against the Finns. I would also think beating the crap out of the other Axis allies would be helpful as well in accomplishing the same thing.

Maybe, not sure about the other Allies though.

In some ways, trading blows with Hungarians or Romanians might be doing the Germans a favor, since it saves "Germans" from getting killed. Probably OKH saw it that way! The Italians in particular will withdraw anyway before they run out of Manpower, so they are particularly expendible for the Axis. Plus, depleted R/H/I formations can be used as garrisons and diggers.

The Finns, however, get about 1/4 the replacements either the Romanians or Hungarians get, and are much more important to the German defenses; they are self-sufficient at full strength, unlike the other armies

Plus, R/H/I have some buttons they can push to put rifles back in the line; they seem to have more AIRBASES than they really need, and the Romanians have a couple excess HQs IMO.

The Finns, on the other hand, really have no excess units like that, unless you want to shrink the size of the Finnish Air Force; not a great idea.

[TulliusDetritus]

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball

Leader Loss: My first significant Leader Loss: Vasilevsky is KIA. [:(] I guess Boris will be on the job at STAVKA for the rest of the war.

Oh well... at least the enemy killed him. And he lasted almost one year. I managed to assassinate him on the very FIRST turn on my other first PBEM game (with the bloody "Relocate HQ" thing from hell)

[wpurdom]

You know, it seems to me that there are some limits to the amount of concrete that can be transported to off-the-beaten path locations on the Eastern front, particularly for the germans and the soviets before 1943. At what level of entrenchments are you building concrete pill boxes and the like? There should be a numeric limit for the Germans and the early soviets IMHO. After Kursk, Glantz seems to be saying that the Soviets used fortified zones to limit the manpower requirements of the parts of the front they weren't attcking.

[Klydon]

I don't know it for fact, but I don't think the Germans used much concrete on the eastern front simply because they didn't have it to spare and concrete is not exactly something common in European Russia. Germans were to make defensive fortifications out of local materials, so I assume a lot of their stuff was made from earth and wood. I know they also liked to bury captured Russian tanks up to the turret as well for strong points. Even something like rock/gravel is not readily available either, which is one of the reasons the Russian roads were so bad.

[Q-Ball]

7/16/42: Northern Offensive

The Finnish offensive continues; with a few more units available now, we are actually making some headway. Several units were pushed back, and we even routed an infantry division (by defeating units behind it first).

Finnish CVs are very low, so I think Tarhunnas will have to bring some reinforcements. In fact, I see at least 1 German unit behind the front with my recon. Not sure what it is, though.

I am certain that this little offensive will be over as soon as some Panzers show up, but that alone will be a good thing.

[Peltonx]

Once you get to 7 million men simply attack all along the lines and drive him from forts, because of the 1v1 2v1 rule. Right after the 42 fall mud season start attacking he should be close to under 16k rifle squads by turn 90. Once the 43 summer starts finish him off, because he be an amry of ants by September 43.

No hexe with 50 cv defending or less is safe from a retreat, which means he lose allot of guns. He can't replase them. You only need to inflict about 50k a turn on the german army for 30 turns and its broken(less then 16 rifle squads). You will easly get 1 to 2 as a death ratio, because of the 1v1 = 2v1 rule.

Crank up art production, slow down tanks. You need about 100k in guns and 7 mill in men.

The key to the game land wise is the land bridge and rivers. If you can break them before the spring mud season of 43 he will not be able to stop you during the summer of 43.

So try to get his loses per turn over 30k asap.

Pelton

[Q-Ball]

7/18/42: Clear

PLANS: I do plan to push it. I have my doubts on the long-term viability of the Germans, so if I crush Tarhunnas in 1943, it's not because he sucks (he doesn't, he is a very good player), but because play balance needs tweaking. Part of the reason we are documenting both sides is to provide data for testing.

I was/am a WITP-AE player, and that game took 3-4 years to balance (granted, it is more complex than this one). And there is STILL tweaking on that engine; it's not perfect. I think WITE shouldn't take that long because it's simpler than WITP-AE, but it will take some games to get it right.

So, I'm firing up the Red Army and seeing how close I can get to Berlin.

Kliment's Revenge:

A good turn up north, as we were successful in 6 combats vs. the Finns, for one loss. A Panzer Corps has appeared; one division was committed as a reserve, but we overwhelmed it anyway.

Tarhunnas is probably going to shift even more up there I think, as I have a Shock Army on the scene, plus several Tank Corps and Cav Corps. As soon as he does we should be stopped, but in the meantime the Finns are taking it on the chin. Not sure what the benchmark should be in mid-42, but Finnish OOB is at 225K at this point.

[Q-Ball]

7/25/42:

The Northern Offensive continues. German forces are slowing us down, and we may be close to calling a halt; my forces are getting spent, and the last couple attacks were heavily in the Germans favor in terms of losses (about 3-1). We have advanced about 3-4 hexes, and lengthened the German front a bit.

Otherwise, not alot to report.

[Baelfiin]

Luftwaffe looks like it played a big part in the losses... 140 stukas ouch

[randallw]

Over 117k men in that attack on the German division; there was more to the attack than the 3 big pieces of the 13th Army, right?

[Klydon]

Has to be. Looks like a 3 hex attack with the rest being infantry. 

[Peltonx]

Q-ball.

Save your forses until after the mud season. You have close to 8 million with allot more in the bank so to speak. Start attacking all along the line, you be easly able to replase 2 million men in less then 20 turns. Attrition will weaken the fins over the summer and fall season. Your industiral base was hardly touched during the 41 summer so you be able to pump out more then your losing during the winter O. Your best area of attack will be south of Keiv.

Pelton