Ketza (CCCP) vrs DAK (Axis) no DAK please

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Sabre21

Post Reply
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

Ketza (CCCP) vrs DAK (Axis) no DAK please

Post by Ketza »

On the surface when I first opened the turn on this new game my initial feeling was DAK might not be that experienced as Axis. Upon further examination it seems his opening might just have a different approach so I thought I would do an AAR for as long as the game may last.

The two main "different" approaches are:

1) No large pockets in the north and center. He pretty much blew everything off the line. This could lead to a very serious leap forward for his infantry turn 2.

2) He did not create a Lvow pocket which leads to some potential interesting play in the south.

So this may be an AAR with a bit of a twist early on which is why started it.

Image
Attachments
Poster002.jpg
Poster002.jpg (123.67 KiB) Viewed 534 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Ketza (CCCP) vrs DAK (Axis) no DAK please

Post by Ketza »

He did a pretty good job of hitting the Soviet air force with the new patches. This was a hint to me that he actually has a good grasp of the game mechanics.

Image
Attachments
DAK1man..airloss.jpg
DAK1man..airloss.jpg (29.43 KiB) Viewed 534 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Ketza (CCCP) vrs DAK (Axis) no DAK please

Post by Ketza »

His AGN north moves. He did not attack Riga. He did make good progress getting over the river and flipping hexes in front of 16th and 18th army leaving no pockets.

Image
Attachments
DAK1agnattacks.jpg
DAK1agnattacks.jpg (154.43 KiB) Viewed 534 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Ketza (CCCP) vrs DAK (Axis) no DAK please

Post by Ketza »

AGC - the usual huge pocket is missing! He did not send any Panzers south and has a rather large bulge of armor near Minsk. Im actually looking forward to seeing what may become of this rather interesting situation. There are however a lot of Soviet units that are now able to be saved for turn 2 operations which is the typical reason for pocketing everyone....

Image
Attachments
DAK1agcattacks.jpg
DAK1agcattacks.jpg (211.87 KiB) Viewed 534 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Ketza (CCCP) vrs DAK (Axis) no DAK please

Post by Ketza »

And finally AGS without a Lvow pocket. This is a bit of a head scratcher for sure. Lots of interesting scenarios might develop.

Image
Attachments
DAK1agsattacks.jpg
DAK1agsattacks.jpg (160.69 KiB) Viewed 534 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Ketza (CCCP) vrs DAK (Axis) no DAK please

Post by Ketza »

With all that attacking his losses were relatively light. Soviet losses were 400k with almost 200k captured. This is much more then a typical turn one but the long term impact of no early pockets will be interesting to see.

Image
Attachments
DAK1losses.jpg
DAK1losses.jpg (31.44 KiB) Viewed 534 times
User avatar
TulliusDetritus
Posts: 5581
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 1:49 am
Location: The Zone™

RE: Ketza (CCCP) vrs DAK (Axis) no DAK please

Post by TulliusDetritus »

Curious. He stopped his panzers at Tarnopol. Is he sticking to a historical move (maybe he thinks this [:@] Lvov pocket thing [:@] is unfair)?

You know far better than me what can be done with the German armored forces in the south, so be careful. Maybe he has a cunning plan: a mega-pocket à la Kiev, so watch your back [:D]

Good luck and above all have fun.
"Hitler is a horrible sexual degenerate, a dangerous fool" - Mussolini, circa 1934
User avatar
Peltonx
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:24 am
Contact:

RE: Ketza (CCCP) vrs DAK (Axis) no DAK please

Post by Peltonx »

Intersting game.

My old moves in north, but AGC and AGS totally different.

Seeing your and old hand and hes new I hope he kicks your butt [:'(]
Beta Tester WitW & WitE
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Ketza (CCCP) vrs DAK (Axis) no DAK please

Post by Ketza »

ORIGINAL: TulliusDetritus

Curious. He stopped his panzers at Tarnopol. Is he sticking to a historical move (maybe he thinks this [:@] Lvov pocket thing [:@] is unfair)?

You know far better than me what can be done with the German armored forces in the south, so be careful. Maybe he has a cunning plan: a mega-pocket à la Kiev, so watch your back [:D]

Good luck and above all have fun.

I am going with the "cunning plan" theory.
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Ketza (CCCP) vrs DAK (Axis) no DAK please

Post by Ketza »

Back from dinner!

Air doctrine settings:

Image
Attachments
DAK1airdoctrine.jpg
DAK1airdoctrine.jpg (42.31 KiB) Viewed 534 times
User avatar
bigbaba
Posts: 1238
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 5:12 pm
Location: Koblenz, Germany

RE: Ketza (CCCP) vrs DAK (Axis) no DAK please

Post by bigbaba »

i dont buy it. he cant have a smart masterplan when he allows you to bring around 70 units into safety which would be doomed at turn 2. this extra units will cause a lot of trouble for him in mid term. plus you are not a newbie who can not find a way to get a advantage of his "mysterious" beginning turn.
User avatar
TulliusDetritus
Posts: 5581
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 1:49 am
Location: The Zone™

RE: Ketza (CCCP) vrs DAK (Axis) no DAK please

Post by TulliusDetritus »

I don't buy it either. The Southwestern Front should be annihilated. These extra units change everything. It means Ketza can freely use the Stavka Reserve Armies to reinforce any threatened area of his choice. He's got Strategic Reserves! And that`s a luxury you CANNOT afford when you face a Lvov mega-pocket. Reserves are gone, poof...

Ketza, could you ask him why he didn't go for the big pocket? Just curious. Maybe it's all about Fair Play... for a change [8D]
"Hitler is a horrible sexual degenerate, a dangerous fool" - Mussolini, circa 1934
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Ketza (CCCP) vrs DAK (Axis) no DAK please

Post by Ketza »

ORIGINAL: bigbaba

i dont buy it. he cant have a smart masterplan when he allows you to bring around 70 units into safety which would be doomed at turn 2. this extra units will cause a lot of trouble for him in mid term. plus you are not a newbie who can not find a way to get a advantage of his "mysterious" beginning turn.

Well maybe I am looking at a glass half full. He is trying some stuff that has been bantered about and this AAR is being done just to see how things transpire. Most of my Soviet games end before blizzard so we will see how this one goes.
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Ketza (CCCP) vrs DAK (Axis) no DAK please

Post by Ketza »

I used naval transport to get the great NKVD unit out of Riga. I also disbanded the fort at the little port and saved 2k manpower. The NKVD unit will be part of the inner Leningrad defense.

Image
Attachments
DAK1fortnkvdsave.jpg
DAK1fortnkvdsave.jpg (57.32 KiB) Viewed 534 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Ketza (CCCP) vrs DAK (Axis) no DAK please

Post by Ketza »

Riga moves. Delaying forces put in front and maybe a few routed guys will flip. Used the pocketed divisions to free up a corridor as well as flip as many hexes as possible to slow down his infantry.

Image
Attachments
Dakrigamove.jpg
Dakrigamove.jpg (99.25 KiB) Viewed 534 times
User avatar
Flaviusx
Posts: 7732
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:55 pm
Location: Southern California

RE: Ketza (CCCP) vrs DAK (Axis) no DAK please

Post by Flaviusx »

Every time I have seen this bulldozing tactic used in lieu of pocketing it has always come back to haunt the German. With pockets, the Soviet has times during 1941 when reinforcements are very very scarce and the lines get extremely thin. If the formations are saved, OTOH, the Soviet can bounce back that much more quickly.

There is one minor advantage of not pocketing these guys, though. Outside of SW front most of these units have abysmal morale. You are actually better off with shells taking in replacements than most of the units in NW and W fronts from a morale standpoint.
WitE Alpha Tester
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Ketza (CCCP) vrs DAK (Axis) no DAK please

Post by Ketza »

He really should have routed that one division. In my Axis move I make it a point to get rid of it. He still has a wide corridor to move his infantry through. We will see if he does it well.

Image
Attachments
Dakcorridor.jpg
Dakcorridor.jpg (82.11 KiB) Viewed 534 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Ketza (CCCP) vrs DAK (Axis) no DAK please

Post by Ketza »

The PSKOV line. Spent some prized APS here to set it up. Its backed by all of Northwestern air forces as well as some Leningrad front air forces.

Image
Attachments
Dak27tharmy.jpg
Dak27tharmy.jpg (61.11 KiB) Viewed 534 times
User avatar
Ketza
Posts: 2228
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:11 am
Location: Columbia, Maryland

RE: Ketza (CCCP) vrs DAK (Axis) no DAK please

Post by Ketza »

11th army Sinyaya river line.

Image
Attachments
Dak11tharmy.jpg
Dak11tharmy.jpg (77.58 KiB) Viewed 534 times
timmyab
Posts: 2047
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:48 pm
Location: Bristol, UK

RE: Ketza (CCCP) vrs DAK (Axis) no DAK please

Post by timmyab »

This game is so over already![:D]
It will be interesting to see just how quickly the Soviet position becomes overwhelming.
ORIGINAL: Flaviusx
There is one minor advantage of not pocketing these guys, though. Outside of SW front most of these units have abysmal morale. You are actually better off with shells taking in replacements than most of the units in NW and W fronts from a morale standpoint.
I guess one option would be to move them way back and let them gain morale and dig for a few weeks, or months even.
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”