Kamikaze activation question

Post bug reports and ask for help with other issues here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
erstad
Posts: 1944
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 11:40 pm
Location: Midwest USA

Kamikaze activation question

Post by erstad »

I thought Kami's would activate for a base within 20 hexes of Takao. I've got an example where they haven't, but the base is exactly 20 hexes. If it's supposed to be 20 hexes or less, I'll post a save. If it's less than 20 hexes, "Never Mind"
User avatar
Quixote
Posts: 774
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:34 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: Kamikaze activation question

Post by Quixote »

Dave,
I think that was once upon a WitP, but your memory is probably still better than mine. Either way, the manual now says 15 hexes.

Image
Attachments
KamikRnage.jpg
KamikRnage.jpg (20.16 KiB) Viewed 274 times
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12457
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Kamikaze activation question

Post by michaelm75au »

The scale has changed from 60nm to 40nm, so the range has changed.
There was a bug initially at release where that range hadn't been adjust for the new scale. Was fixed in second official patch IIRC.
Michael
bk19@mweb.co.za
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:27 pm

RE: Kamikaze activation question

Post by bk19@mweb.co.za »

ORIGINAL: michaelm
The scale has changed from 60nm to 40nm, so the range has changed.
There was a bug initially at release where that range hadn't been adjust for the new scale. Was fixed in second official patch IIRC.

Ok that is understood, but was it intended to change the trigger range from 1200 miles to 690 miles? (20 * 60 -> 15 * 46)

Could it be that you mean to say that the range has been adjusted from 15 hexes (15 * 60) to 20 hexes (20 * 46): 900 -> 920 miles, which makes a bit more sense to me?
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12457
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Kamikaze activation question

Post by michaelm75au »

Patch 2
Change range to activate kamikaze to 20 hex from stock 15
The manual hadn't been updated before release. Not clear in my previous post

Michael
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12457
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Kamikaze activation question

Post by michaelm75au »

ORIGINAL: erstad

I thought Kami's would activate for a base within 20 hexes of Takao. I've got an example where they haven't, but the base is exactly 20 hexes. If it's supposed to be 20 hexes or less, I'll post a save. If it's less than 20 hexes, "Never Mind"

Base within 20 sea hexes of BASE_TOKYO, or BASE_TAKAO or BASE_SAIGON. Not counting bases in China or Tibet.
Michael
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Kamikaze activation question

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: bk19@mweb.co.za
ORIGINAL: michaelm
The scale has changed from 60nm to 40nm, so the range has changed.
There was a bug initially at release where that range hadn't been adjust for the new scale. Was fixed in second official patch IIRC.

Ok that is understood, but was it intended to change the trigger range from 1200 miles to 690 miles? (20 * 60 -> 15 * 46)

Could it be that you mean to say that the range has been adjusted from 15 hexes (15 * 60) to 20 hexes (20 * 46): 900 -> 920 miles, which makes a bit more sense to me?

Just FYI, the comparison of hex size is 60 nautical miles for WITP versus 40 nautical miles for AE. Where you see "46" in AE that is 46 statute miles (which equals 40 nautical miles), and it is used by land units (as in when they move 1 hex movement = 46 miles).
bk19@mweb.co.za
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:27 pm

RE: Kamikaze activation question

Post by bk19@mweb.co.za »

ORIGINAL: witpqs
ORIGINAL: bk19@mweb.co.za
ORIGINAL: michaelm
The scale has changed from 60nm to 40nm, so the range has changed.
There was a bug initially at release where that range hadn't been adjust for the new scale. Was fixed in second official patch IIRC.

Ok that is understood, but was it intended to change the trigger range from 1200 miles to 690 miles? (20 * 60 -> 15 * 46)

Could it be that you mean to say that the range has been adjusted from 15 hexes (15 * 60) to 20 hexes (20 * 46): 900 -> 920 miles, which makes a bit more sense to me?

Just FYI, the comparison of hex size is 60 nautical miles for WITP versus 40 nautical miles for AE. Where you see "46" in AE that is 46 statute miles (which equals 40 nautical miles), and it is used by land units (as in when they move 1 hex movement = 46 miles).

Thanks for the pointer witpqs, but your remark immediately highlights this:

Activation range has changed from 15 * 60 = 900 nautical miles to 20 * 40 = 800 nautical miles. i.e. The allies have to be a bit closer to cause activation of Kamikazes. Is this the intention?
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12457
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Kamikaze activation question

Post by michaelm75au »

Whether the intent of not, that was the compromised distance.
Michael
erstad
Posts: 1944
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 11:40 pm
Location: Midwest USA

RE: Kamikaze activation question

Post by erstad »

ORIGINAL: michaelm

ORIGINAL: erstad

I thought Kami's would activate for a base within 20 hexes of Takao. I've got an example where they haven't, but the base is exactly 20 hexes. If it's supposed to be 20 hexes or less, I'll post a save. If it's less than 20 hexes, "Never Mind"

Base within 20 sea hexes of BASE_TOKYO, or BASE_TAKAO or BASE_SAIGON. Not counting bases in China or Tibet.

Thanks, Michael, that clears it up. The key is "sea hexes" (and the manual does mention "traced by sea only", I'm just a little slow at times)
Rainer79
Posts: 603
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 7:49 am
Location: Austria

RE: Kamikaze activation question

Post by Rainer79 »

Note that bases in China really means bases owned by China. If the Chinese army spills into Indochina and owns e.g. Cam Ranh Bay Kamis won't get activated.
USS Henrico
Posts: 152
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:05 am
Location: Charlottesville, VA

RE: Kamikaze activation question

Post by USS Henrico »

Is the base which is used to trigger activation required to be owned by the Japanese at some point prior to 1/1/44? Or can the Japanese just ignore capturing a small (non-Chinese) Allied base within range of Tokyo/Takao/Saigon to get the Kamikazes triggered on 1/1/44?

Also, are Allied controlled dot hexes considered a base for activation purposes?
April 2, 1945. The USS Henrico, supporting the invasion of Okinawa, is struck by a Francis operating as a Kamikaze, killing 51. Among the wounded was the father of this poster.
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12457
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Kamikaze activation question

Post by michaelm75au »

ORIGINAL: USS Henrico

Is the base which is used to trigger activation required to be owned by the Japanese at some point prior to 1/1/44? Or can the Japanese just ignore capturing a small (non-Chinese) Allied base within range of Tokyo/Takao/Saigon to get the Kamikazes triggered on 1/1/44?

Also, are Allied controlled dot hexes considered a base for activation purposes?
I think you have it backwards. The Allies usually have to capture a base within the range to activate Kami. The Japanese player can't activate them, unless he concedes to (allows to be captured by) the Allies, a base within range.
If a base within range starts out as Allied controlled and never captured by Japan, then kamikazes would be active from 1944.
Michael
User avatar
Hotschi
Posts: 548
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:04 pm
Location: Austria

RE: Kamikaze activation question

Post by Hotschi »

I asked the same question some months ago, and there were also this piece included in the answer -
Base must have an AF 1+. This would exclude the 'dot' bases unless they are built up. There is no limitation such that the base has to have been occupied by the Japanese and re-captured. However, these will never activate before January 1, 1944.
"A big butcher's bill is not necessarily evidence of good tactics"

- Wavell's reply to Churchill, after the latter complained about faint-heartedness, as he discovered that British casualties in the evacuation from Somaliland had been only 260 men.
USS Henrico
Posts: 152
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:05 am
Location: Charlottesville, VA

RE: Kamikaze activation question

Post by USS Henrico »

ORIGINAL: Hotschi

I asked the same question some months ago, and there were also this piece included in the answer -
Base must have an AF 1+. This would exclude the 'dot' bases unless they are built up. There is no limitation such that the base has to have been occupied by the Japanese and re-captured. However, these will never activate before January 1, 1944.

That's the answer I was looking for, thanks. In my PBEM there are a couple bases with level 1 ports within trigger range that were never occupied by the Japanese. Since their AF level is 0, they shouldn't trigger "the hordes" ahead of time. [:)]
April 2, 1945. The USS Henrico, supporting the invasion of Okinawa, is struck by a Francis operating as a Kamikaze, killing 51. Among the wounded was the father of this poster.
User avatar
Chickenboy
Posts: 24648
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
Location: San Antonio, TX

RE: Kamikaze activation question

Post by Chickenboy »

ORIGINAL: USS Henrico

ORIGINAL: Hotschi

I asked the same question some months ago, and there were also this piece included in the answer -
Base must have an AF 1+. This would exclude the 'dot' bases unless they are built up. There is no limitation such that the base has to have been occupied by the Japanese and re-captured. However, these will never activate before January 1, 1944.

That's the answer I was looking for, thanks. In my PBEM there are a couple bases with level 1 ports within trigger range that were never occupied by the Japanese. Since their AF level is 0, they shouldn't trigger "the hordes" ahead of time. [:)]
GAH! I'll have to amend this oversight, since it will not be of benefit to me now...
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”