Musashi Super Weapon

Uncommon Valor: Campaign for the South Pacific covers the campaigns for New Guinea, New Britain, New Ireland and the Solomon chain.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Tankerace, siRkid

Snigbert
Posts: 765
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Worcester, MA. USA

Musashi Super Weapon

Post by Snigbert »

I read recently that the Musashi took some ridiculous number of hits during the battle of Leyte, like 27 torpedoes and 29 bombs before she slowed down to 6 knots and the captain ordered for her to be run aground and used as a shore battery. She ended up sinking before she was run aground.
Has anyone seen the Yamato or Musashi take that kind of damage and survive in UV? Or any ship for that matter?
"Money doesnt talk, it swears. Obscenities, who really cares?" -Bob Dylan

"Habit is the balast that chains a dog to it's vomit." -Samuel Becket

"He has weapons of mass destruction- the world's deadliest weapons- which pose a direct threat to the
Black Cat
Posts: 604
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2002 6:46 pm

Re: Musashi Super Weapon

Post by Black Cat »

Originally posted by Snigbert
I read recently that the Musashi took some ridiculous number of hits during the battle of Leyte, like 27 torpedoes and 29 bombs before she slowed down to 6 knots and the captain ordered for her to be run aground and used as a shore battery. She ended up sinking before she was run aground.
Has anyone seen the Yamato or Musashi take that kind of damage and survive in UV? Or any ship for that matter?


Yes, the Transports. :eek:
User avatar
Howard Mitchell
Posts: 449
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2002 11:41 am
Location: Blighty

Post by Howard Mitchell »

The Musashi was sunk after a series of attacks with up to 30 minutes between them. After 5 attacks she had taken 9 torpedoes, 7 bombs and around 12 near misses, and though slowed to 12 knots was not in danger of sinking. The final attack by 75 aircraft added 11 torpedo and 10 bomb hits as well as 6 near misses. She still took nearly 5 hours to capsize after that.

The sinking of the Musashi was an object lesson to US experts. The number of bomb and torpedo hits required to sink the ship amazed US designers. A careful analysis of her last few hours resulted in a memorandum and briefing by a damage survey team from the US Navy’s Bureau of Ships to the effect that torpedo attacks against large warships should be concentrated on one side to maximize the tendency to capsize. Torpedo hits on both sides of capital ships tend to have the effect of counter-flooding, thereby offsetting the effects of flooding.

This advice was instrumental in the sinking of the Yamato several months later, which was sunk by 13 torpedoes (11 certain, 2 probable), 8 confirmed bomb hits and an unknown number of near misses, and sank within 2 hours of the start of the attacks.

In both cases the bombs had little or no impact in terms of sinking the ships – that was done by torpedoes. The bombs reduced the ships ability to defend themselves by destroying the anti-aircraft armament and its controls and killing or injuring large numbers of crew.

Source – Axis and Neutral Battleships of WWII, by Garzke and Dulin, Naval Institute Press.
While the battles the British fight may differ in the widest possible ways, they invariably have two common characteristics – they are always fought uphill and always at the junction of two or more map sheets.

General Sir William Slim
User avatar
Drex
Posts: 2512
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Chico,california

Post by Drex »

I had the Musashi take one torpedo by a PT boat and the AI took her out of the battleline with 18 sys damage.
Col Saito: "Don't speak to me of rules! This is war! It is not a game of cricket!"
Snigbert
Posts: 765
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Worcester, MA. USA

Post by Snigbert »

You're right, it's 17 and 19 hits. I just double checked my numbers in Costello's The Pacific War 1941-1945 . At least the sources are close enough there is no point disagreeing about them.

The bomb hits also had the benefit of hitting the bridge and killing much of the command staff.
"Money doesnt talk, it swears. Obscenities, who really cares?" -Bob Dylan

"Habit is the balast that chains a dog to it's vomit." -Samuel Becket

"He has weapons of mass destruction- the world's deadliest weapons- which pose a direct threat to the
rawink
Posts: 179
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 11:32 pm
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Contact:

Post by rawink »

in an AI Game, My Surface group got into a slugging match with a IJN group.. afterwards, ALL of my 5 BB's were ripped up badly and had to limp to Noumea, 2 went to Pearl :mad:

the IJN force lost an old BB "Kirishma?" and the Yamato was slowed down and given a DD for escourt. The battle happened off of Tassaforonga.. and it took Yamato 3 turns to get past Shortland Is.

now comes the fun part.. I have a 4 CV TF headed for the slot.. and for 12 turns I battered the yamato.. with 2 or 3 bomb hits per raid, and usually a torp or two. The AAA on Ymato butchered my flgihts as well.

I finally quit giving chase once I was within land based air cover of TRUK! dang Yamato made truk, and i assume Tokyo since I havent seen her since.

My GOD she was tough!
Robert
Fly, die.. rinse and repeat
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

Post by Brady »

I hit Mushasi the other day with 5 1,000 pound bombs all acheaved a penatration, and she showed as Heavly damaged with lots of enternal exploshiosn and masive cashulaties, After that atack I could not find her again.
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
BowdenRussell
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Pacific Palisades, California, USA
Contact:

Post by BowdenRussell »

Originally posted by Snigbert
You're right, it's 17 and 19 hits. I just double checked my numbers in Costello's The Pacific War 1941-1945 . At least the sources are close enough there is no point disagreeing about them.

The bomb hits also had the benefit of hitting the bridge and killing much of the command staff.



Trust nothing you read in Costello's book. One could write a book on the errors and editing mistakes alone on that piece of fecal matter.
User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

Book

Post by Raverdave »

THE book to get on the Musashi is:-

"Battleship Musashi: The making and sinking of the world's biggest battleship"
By Akira Yoshimura. ISBN 4-7700-2400-2.

Takes you through the planning stages of the ship, building her and her service in WW2. One of the few books that I would recommend.
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
thantis
Posts: 161
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Cooksville, MD

Post by thantis »

The near misses were almost as good as hit on the Yamato - both ships (Y & M) were constructed with too little flexibility in their armor design, meaning that near misses were almost able to shake the ships apart, causing flooding & structural issues during the attacks.
Never Underestimate the Power of a Small Tactical Nuclear Weapon.....
User avatar
Admiral DadMan
Posts: 3402
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2002 10:00 am
Location: A Lion uses all its might to catch a Rabbit

Sometimes, it just ain't a fair fight...

Post by Admiral DadMan »

I had a feeling my opponent had some heavies in the area to mess with my boys on Guadalcanal, so I stripped my carriers of their screening cruisers, and set the TF to React. (I love react).

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 11/30/42

Weather: Partly Cloudy

Night Time Surface Combat, near Lunga at 38,40

Japanese Ships
BB Musashi, Shell hits 19, on fire, heavy damage
CA Suzuya, Shell hits 6, on fire
CL Natori, Shell hits 1
DD Akigumo, Shell hits 8, on fire, heavy damage
DD Kagero, Shell hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
DD Tanikaze, Shell hits 3, on fire
DD Oshio, Shell hits 14, on fire, heavy damage
DD Asagumo, Shell hits 12, on fire, heavy damage
DD Murasame, Shell hits 2, on fire
DD Yudachi, Shell hits 5, on fire, heavy damage
DD Kawakaze, Shell hits 17, and is sunk
DD Mikazuki, Shell hits 16, and is sunk

Allied Ships
BB South Dakota, Shell hits 1
CA Pensacola
CA New Orleans
CA Astoria
CA San Francisco, Shell hits 1
CA Vincennes, Shell hits 1
CA Canberra
CL Helena, Shell hits 1
CL Phoenix, Shell hits 2, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
CL Nashville, Shell hits 3
CL Boise
CL Honolulu, Shell hits 2, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
DD Fletcher
DD Duncan
DD Lansdowne
DD McCalla
DD Patterson
DD Gridley
DD Craven


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Lunga at 38,40

Japanese Ships
BB Musashi, Shell hits 27, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
CA Suzuya, Shell hits 30, and is sunk
CL Natori, Shell hits 17, on fire, heavy damage
DD Akigumo, Shell hits 2, and is sunk
DD Kagero, Shell hits 9, and is sunk
DD Tanikaze, Shell hits 17, on fire, heavy damage
DD Oshio, and is sunk
DD Asagumo, Shell hits 7, and is sunk
DD Murasame, Shell hits 9, and is sunk
DD Yudachi, Shell hits 9, and is sunk

Allied Ships
BB South Dakota
CA Pensacola
CA New Orleans
CA Astoria
CA San Francisco
CA Vincennes
CA Canberra
CL Helena, Shell hits 1
CL Phoenix, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
CL Nashville
CL Boise
CL Honolulu, on fire
DD Fletcher
DD Duncan
DD Lansdowne
DD McCalla
DD Patterson
DD Gridley
DD Craven


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Lunga at 38,40

Japanese Ships
BB Musashi, Shell hits 4, and is sunk
CL Natori, Shell hits 29, on fire, heavy damage
DD Tanikaze, and is sunk

Allied Ships
BB South Dakota
CA Pensacola
CA New Orleans
CA Astoria
CA San Francisco
CA Vincennes
CA Canberra
CL Helena
CL Phoenix, on fire, heavy damage
CL Nashville
CL Boise
CL Honolulu, on fire
DD Fletcher
DD Duncan
DD Lansdowne
DD McCalla
DD Patterson
DD Gridley
DD Craven


I lost track of how many 16"/45cal Musashi took after 20... God loves a good surprise.
Scenario 127: "Scraps of Paper"
(\../)
(O.o)
(> <)

CVB Langley:
Image
mdiehl
Posts: 3969
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mdiehl »

In both cases the bombs had little or no impact in terms of sinking the ships – that was done by torpedoes. The bombs reduced the ships ability to defend themselves by destroying the anti-aircraft armament and its controls and killing or injuring large numbers of crew.
Not true for Yamato. The second bomb to hit her was 1000 pounder that started a fire in her upper 6" magazine. The fire was not controllable or containable, and is the most likely cause of an explosion of her #3 main magazine. She'd have sunk that day as a result of this one bomb, but of course, there's never just one bomb. See the Yamato record on the BB tactical record of movment page at:

www.combinedfleet.com
Show me a fellow who rejects statistical analysis a priori and I'll show you a fellow who has no knowledge of statistics.

Didn't we have this conversation already?
Michael Walker
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2002 10:17 pm
Contact:

Yamato

Post by Michael Walker »

Recently I received the Yamato in one of my Pbem games... It received 3 percentage points of damage just sortying from Truk on its mission. Somehow, the computer did a lousy job of setting up its bombardment mission to PM and it was in air range just prior to attacking. It was hit with 3 1000lb bombs. Total damage: now up to 4 %. 3 1000lb bombs did 1/3 the damage of just sailing down to New Guinea!

Mike
mdiehl
Posts: 3969
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mdiehl »

Interesting, but not necessarily all that wierd. The historical killer bomb could be viewed as one that hit an unusual location under situations that were not fortuitous for the IJN. In effect, a critical hit indeed! However, 3 bombs striking her in other sectiosn (atop a main battery carapace, for instance) would kill personnel and chip the paint. Of course, the bombs could also easily destroy the AA and main fire directors (as happened to both Yamato and Musashi), and wipe out AAA positions.

Taking 3% sys damage for sortieing is not all that wierd, IMO. Yamato and her sisters' propulsion systems were inefficient and required very high maintenance. The problem worsened as lousy fuel became the standard in the late war.
Show me a fellow who rejects statistical analysis a priori and I'll show you a fellow who has no knowledge of statistics.

Didn't we have this conversation already?
Yamamoto
Posts: 742
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Miami, Fl. U.S.A.

Re: Yamato

Post by Yamamoto »

Originally posted by Michael Walker
Somehow, the computer did a lousy job of setting up its bombardment mission to PM and it was in air range just prior to attacking.

Mike


It wasn’t the AI’s fault that Yamato started the turn within enemy air range. Yamato only goes 27.5 knots. Any ship under 30 knots will have to start the turn within enemy air range. Still, that’s better than previous versions of UV where the ship would ALWAYS start outside of enemy air range and, if it wasn’t fast enough to do the bombardment, it would sit there forever. I much prefer the current system.

Yamamoto
SoulBlazer
Posts: 766
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 5:28 am
Location: Providence RI

Post by SoulBlazer »

I happen to REALLY like Costello's book, and since I have a MA in American History and used the book to help write my thesis on Carrier Operations in the Pacific War, I only spotted a few errors. (As opposed to Victory at Sea, which is riddled with them). What did'nt you like about the book?

As for sinking the Musashi, that's a amazing surface battle, you got lucky. :)
The US Navy could probaly win a war without coffee, but would prefer not to try -- Samuel Morison
User avatar
PzB74
Posts: 5069
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2000 8:00 am
Location: No(r)way

Post by PzB74 »

Does anyone know if there has been taken pictures of the sunken Yamato and Musashi?

Robert Ballard has been all over the world and photographed and written books about sunken ships.
I specially liked his book The lost ships at Guadalcanal!
Attachments
quincy_i.jpg
quincy_i.jpg (90.13 KiB) Viewed 715 times
Image

"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

Post by Nikademus »

Originally posted by mdiehl
Not true for Yamato. The second bomb to hit her was 1000 pounder that started a fire in her upper 6" magazine. The fire was not controllable or containable, and is the most likely cause of an explosion of her #3 main magazine. She'd have sunk that day as a result of this one bomb, but of course, there's never just one bomb. See the Yamato record on the BB tactical record of movment page at:

www.combinedfleet.com



No 1000ILB bomb was capable of direct penetration of Yamato's primary armor deck. The hit that started a fire in Yamato's 6 inch magazine aft was caused by a bomb that impacted (and exploded) directly on the aft 6 inch gunhouse, demolishing the turret and starting a very large fire which was left to burn. Hot splinters from the detonation did enter the magazine and was reputed to start a blaze that was also unfought. This occured approximately around 1245 hours.

It was not until around 1405-1415 hours that warning buzzers went off on the bridge alerting the crew that temperatures in the aft magazines was reaching dangerous levels. Attempts to flood the magazines proved impossible due to the heavy flooding damage caused by the torpedo hits, particularily the final attack wave

At this point Yamato was near dead in the water and listing 22 degrees, increasing steadily. In other words the inability to flood the aft magazines was moot in face of the heavy progressive flooding. She was in a sinking condition and doomed.

The bomb hit(s) were no more "Killer" than they were on Musashi. Given the sheer amount of time that elapsed between the bomb hit that demolished the aft 6 inch turret and the sounding of temperature alarms in the aft magazines, I suspect that the "Fire" in the aft 6 inch magazine was only of the small smouldering type (the type of fire usually caused by hot splinter fragments). Had it been of a larger order, the alarms would have sounded far sooner. Either way the result would have been the flooding of the magazines as at that point in time, The machinery had not been disabled by list or level of progressive flooding.

Source: Axis and Neutral battleships of WWII
Snigbert
Posts: 765
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Worcester, MA. USA

Post by Snigbert »

I didnt find that many errors in Costello either, I thought it was well written and an enjoyable read. I also have a B.A. in History so I think I am a somewhat critical reader. I'm curious why you dislike Costello so much.
"Money doesnt talk, it swears. Obscenities, who really cares?" -Bob Dylan

"Habit is the balast that chains a dog to it's vomit." -Samuel Becket

"He has weapons of mass destruction- the world's deadliest weapons- which pose a direct threat to the
User avatar
Admiral DadMan
Posts: 3402
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2002 10:00 am
Location: A Lion uses all its might to catch a Rabbit

Post by Admiral DadMan »

Maybe he's confused with Elvis -- Costello that is.
Scenario 127: "Scraps of Paper"
(\../)
(O.o)
(> <)

CVB Langley:
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific”