question about dis-engaging

[budd]

Is there a secret to dis-engaging from combat? couple of my units were stuck for just about the whole scenario. They ran into a enemy on the way to there objectives and were disrupted to level 3 and 4 and couldn't withdraw. I tried to change to withdraw posture, but they must of failed the quality check or something. you mean i can't just move away from the enemy during the movement phase? Do i need to change to another posture before attempting to move away, i think they were in attack posture, other than me trying to change into withdraw posture. I attempted to move with infiltrate, but that wasn't what i wanted to do, and it failed anyway so they took fire every turn and kept there disruption level. I was trying to disengage and go around and continue on towards the objective.
Thx for any insight.
budd

[sabre1]

sigh...[8|]

I'm sure smarter guys than me will weigh in, but I still think this is a problem.

[Fred98]

Yes you must switch to Withdrawal Posture.

"Wiithdrawal" works sometimes and not other times.

When you need it to work it never works but when you do a test with a view to posting it here it always works just fine [&:]


.

[budd]

tried to switch to withdrawal posture, just never passed the quality check i guess. So i can infiltrate to the side of the enemy[when it works, it worked more than withdrawal] but can't go away from the enemy, interesting. I had 3 units get toasted because they stayed at level 4 disruption and refused to withdrawal despite numerous attempts and kept getting hammered and eventually poof there toast.

another time i was playing Guadalcanal as the japs, do they have any command linkage. Units were right by HQ's but for the whole scenario everyone was out of command and a handful of units were out of supply and i couldn't figure out why.Tried hitting the button to trace supply but there was no indication of any supply point. Learning as i go, but enjoying it none the less. Thx for your reply's.
budd

[Fred98]

ORIGINAL: **budd**
another time i was playing Guadalcanal as the japs, do they have any command linkage. Units were right by HQ's but for the whole scenario everyone was out of command

I asked about this in the early days. Sometimes in clear terrain a unit near to it's HQ can remain out of command or out of supply for turn after turn.

Don't quite understand the mechanics here.

.
.

[PirateJock]

ORIGINAL: Joe 98
... "Wiithdrawal" works sometimes and not other times.

When you need it to work it never works but when you do a test with a view to posting it here it always works just fine [&:]

I'd agree with that! Withdrawal is better than it was but I still can't figure out why in a game sometimes it works and other times no-go.

The guadalcanal question has been asked before - but can't find the thread! However in this scenario there are 4 units (Nasu Force HQ, II/16, I/29 & I/124) that are not assigned to a HQ at the start of the game. It's possible to attach the rifle units to a HQ but you can't attach Nasu Force HQ to the Div HQ (I think the game thinks it's a Div HQ already?). This sets the game up with those units on limited supply which may have been the thinking of the map designer ... possibly.

Cheers