Am I correct in thinking...

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
Schanilec
Posts: 4038
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Grand Forks, ND

Am I correct in thinking...

Post by Schanilec »

That the USS Long Island can only transport single engine aircraft.

Also Boyington can not transfer to a Marine unit only USAAF units.

Thanks in adavance.
This is one Czech that doesn't bounce.
User avatar
dr.hal
Posts: 3578
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:41 pm
Location: Covington LA via Montreal!

RE: Am I correct in thinking...

Post by dr.hal »

when I transported even single engine a/c on the Hornet (added to the airgroup) the number jumped into the red BIG time. So I would say in relation to the LI, you are correct... but this can easily be tested... put into a transport tf, dock and try to load 2 engine a/c. IIRC, tonnage has something to do with it....
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: Am I correct in thinking...

Post by HansBolter »

Since the LI is classified as a carrier (CVE or CVL can't remember which) and not an air transport ship (AKV) it is safe to assume that only single engine carrier capable plane can be deployed on it.

My question is why use it for air transport when it functions as a carrier? Place an understrength marine fighter squadron on it and use it to provide CAP over your replenishment CVE TFs since the replenishment CVEs can't conduct flight ops to cover themselves when thier air squadrons are filled to more than half capacity.

Can't answer about Pappy, just don't know.
Hans

spence
Posts: 5421
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: Am I correct in thinking...

Post by spence »

He probably had seen a picture like this. I know I saw a picture with some PV-1 Venturas being transported to somewhere in the Pacific but of course I can't find it now.

Image
Attachments
uss_barnes.jpg
uss_barnes.jpg (107.33 KiB) Viewed 295 times
User avatar
dr.hal
Posts: 3578
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:41 pm
Location: Covington LA via Montreal!

RE: Am I correct in thinking...

Post by dr.hal »

I agree with the idea that it really is a flattop, and as the first escort type, it stands alone for quite some time. I would use it to provide air support not transport... there are LOTS of transports available and all too few CVEs (at least for the first year and more).....
awadley
Posts: 153
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:44 pm
Location: Wichita, KS

RE: Am I correct in thinking...

Post by awadley »

Spence, those are P-38's with the wings removed and P-40's. I think this was common pratice during the early war. Only way to get the little guys to the outer islands. Also, I wish we could use the CVL and CVE's to carry plans in this fashion (overloaded and not combat ready).

PS: Boyington can not be changed from USAAF to USMC. this is per one of the developers
Image

Gunner USMCR
User avatar
Mundy
Posts: 2874
Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2002 6:12 am
Location: Neenah

RE: Am I correct in thinking...

Post by Mundy »

Ha!


Ed-
Image
bradfordkay
Posts: 8686
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Olympia, WA

RE: Am I correct in thinking...

Post by bradfordkay »

"Also Boyington can not transfer to a Marine unit only USAAF units. "

I put him into a P-38 squadron with Richard Bong. It is my elite squadron that has many, many kills. Alas... Pappy was killed with only 9 kills to his credit...
fair winds,
Brad
spence
Posts: 5421
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: Am I correct in thinking...

Post by spence »

Spence, those are P-38's with the wings removed and P-40's.

I know that they're P-38s especially after reading the caption. I made the comment about the PVs (2E bombers) because I have seen a photo showing them loaded onto a CVE as deck cargo. That photo was the first thing that came to mind when I read the original post; but as I said, when I went to search for it I couldn't find it.

(According to the caption for this one the single engine planes are P-47s and the others are P-38s with wings removed. It would almost seem that the USN occasionally cooperated with the USA.)
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Am I correct in thinking...

Post by witpqs »

Didn't see if this already has been posted. Single-engine planes (or maybe only fighters??) can be loaded onto a carrier. They can not operate from the carrier. They can fly off of the carrier to transfer to a land base (this is useful as you can fly to a base without getting too close to it). Also, they are considered to take up a lot more space than 'carrier capable' planes (not designed with things like folding wings, etc.).
User avatar
wdolson
Posts: 7688
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: Am I correct in thinking...

Post by wdolson »

I don't recall doing it with AE, but back in the WitP days I was able to transport P-38s with CVEs and fly them off.  I believe CVs and CVEs can only carry carrier capable aircraft and non-capable fighters for fly off only.

Bill
WIS Development Team
jcjordan
Posts: 1900
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2001 8:00 am

RE: Am I correct in thinking...

Post by jcjordan »

As to Boyington, if you're talking about the AVG one, yes he can only go to army units since that is how he's defined in the db even though his pilot is linked to the USMC Boyington ldr (IIRC). You do get Boyington as a USMC ldr so he can lead vmf214 just not a pilot for the usmc.
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: Am I correct in thinking...

Post by crsutton »

ORIGINAL: awadley

Spence, those are P-38's with the wings removed and P-40's. I think this was common pratice during the early war. Only way to get the little guys to the outer islands. Also, I wish we could use the CVL and CVE's to carry plans in this fashion (overloaded and not combat ready).

PS: Boyington can not be changed from USAAF to USMC. this is per one of the developers

You can. I just loaded 50 single engine aircraft onto a CVE. Not a problem but they will not fly combat missions when the ship is loaded up that much. Not sure if they can fly off. (Should not be able to with that load) but I will try it out.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: Am I correct in thinking...

Post by HansBolter »

ORIGINAL: crsutton

ORIGINAL: awadley

Spence, those are P-38's with the wings removed and P-40's. I think this was common pratice during the early war. Only way to get the little guys to the outer islands. Also, I wish we could use the CVL and CVE's to carry plans in this fashion (overloaded and not combat ready).

PS: Boyington can not be changed from USAAF to USMC. this is per one of the developers

You can. I just loaded 50 single engine aircraft onto a CVE. Not a problem but they will not fly combat missions when the ship is loaded up that much. Not sure if they can fly off. (Should not be able to with that load) but I will try it out.


It also makes me wonder how the replenishment CVEs can fly off replacements to the combat carriers when both thier squadrons are full or near full. The CVEs carry two squadrons, a fighter and a bomber, both with maximum sizes of 28 planes and the carriers themselves only have a capacity of 28 (can't remember if some of them have slightly higher capacities like 30 or 32).

With both squadrons full, how could there be sufficient deck space for launching the replacements for transfer to the combat carriers?
Hans

Schanilec
Posts: 4038
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Grand Forks, ND

RE: Am I correct in thinking...

Post by Schanilec »

That is what I figured. Haven't tried P-38's. She's heading to L.A. right now for a little maintainence. Then back to aircraft ferrying. I'll give the P-38's a whirl.
I kinda thought Pappy had to stay in the USAAF, but I thought I'd ask. So I'll transfer him to a P-38 squadron. I like that idea of pairing him up with Dick Bong.
Thank everyone.
This is one Czech that doesn't bounce.
User avatar
wdolson
Posts: 7688
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: Am I correct in thinking...

Post by wdolson »

ORIGINAL: HansBolter
It also makes me wonder how the replenishment CVEs can fly off replacements to the combat carriers when both thier squadrons are full or near full. The CVEs carry two squadrons, a fighter and a bomber, both with maximum sizes of 28 planes and the carriers themselves only have a capacity of 28 (can't remember if some of them have slightly higher capacities like 30 or 32).

With both squadrons full, how could there be sufficient deck space for launching the replacements for transfer to the combat carriers?

US CVEs had catapults. It was the only way to get a loaded TBF off the deck.

Bill
WIS Development Team
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”