ASW Altitude

Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
nate25
Posts: 1190
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:17 pm
Location: Fishers Indiana

ASW Altitude

Post by nate25 »

Community,

New AE player here vs. AI. What's the best altitude for ASW patrol? Any input would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Nate
I have a subtle and cunning plan.
User avatar
nate25
Posts: 1190
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:17 pm
Location: Fishers Indiana

RE: ASW Altitude

Post by nate25 »

Got it in another thread. Thanks anyway.

Nate
I have a subtle and cunning plan.
User avatar
jeffk3510
Posts: 4143
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:59 am
Location: Merica

RE: ASW Altitude

Post by jeffk3510 »

--removed, already answered--
Life is tough. The sooner you realize that, the easier it will be.
User avatar
dr.hal
Posts: 3577
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:41 pm
Location: Covington LA via Montreal!

RE: ASW Altitude

Post by dr.hal »

What was it?
User avatar
nate25
Posts: 1190
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:17 pm
Location: Fishers Indiana

RE: ASW Altitude

Post by nate25 »

Dr. Hal,

100 ft.

Thanks,
Nate
I have a subtle and cunning plan.
User avatar
HansBolter
Posts: 7457
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:30 pm
Location: United States

RE: ASW Altitude

Post by HansBolter »

ORIGINAL: nate25

Dr. Hal,

100 ft.

Thanks,
Nate


I used to set my ASW at 100 ft. after reading that thread.

After seeing what horrendous OPs losses 100 ft. altitude buys for me, I moved my ASW to 1000 ft.

Once a little skill is gained I get just as many attack reports at 1000 ft. without the horrendous OPs losses.


No need to take my word for it though as I my claim is anecdotal without any empirical evidence.

Experiment a bit and see for yourselves.

I am curious to see what experiences others have.
Hans

Cavalry Corp
Posts: 4199
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 5:28 pm
Location: Sampford Spiney Devon UK

RE: ASW Altitude

Post by Cavalry Corp »

Morale also seems to suffer when flying lower?
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10787
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: ASW Altitude

Post by PaxMondo »

I use 2000ft quite effectively ... ops losses are rare ...
Pax
mcissell
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:10 pm

RE: ASW Altitude

Post by mcissell »

With experience pilot's I use 5000ft. I don't think that's to high to see a periscope wake, witih binoculars, and you cover much more area.
User avatar
dr.hal
Posts: 3577
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:41 pm
Location: Covington LA via Montreal!

RE: ASW Altitude

Post by dr.hal »

Thanks Nate....
Mistmatz
Posts: 1399
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 8:56 pm

RE: ASW Altitude

Post by Mistmatz »

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

I use 2000ft quite effectively ... ops losses are rare ...

+1
If you gained knowledge through the forum, why not putting it into the AE wiki?

http://witp-ae.wikia.com/wiki/War_in_th ... ition_Wiki

User avatar
nate25
Posts: 1190
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:17 pm
Location: Fishers Indiana

RE: ASW Altitude

Post by nate25 »

Good thoughts, everyone.

I'll experiment with 500 ft. and 1000 ft.

HB, I feel your pain from the ops losses. IMHO, they're way too high in this game, especially for airframes like the DC-3/C-47. DC-3s (at least two of the airframes I know of were WW II vets) were still flying regularly out of Hook Field here in Middletown as late as 2005.

Experienced squadrons with hundreds of missions per pilot with experience in the 80s, flying out of size 9 airfields with more than ample av support should not be losing 1-2 aircraft per week.

Ok, ok, I'll get off my soapbox now. . .

Thanks, Nate
I have a subtle and cunning plan.
User avatar
nate25
Posts: 1190
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:17 pm
Location: Fishers Indiana

RE: ASW Altitude

Post by nate25 »

Pax (or anyone, really),

What are the minimum exp. levels with which you will field a squadron with ASW duties?

Search, ASW, and Naval Attack.

Thanks,
Nate
I have a subtle and cunning plan.
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10787
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: ASW Altitude

Post by PaxMondo »

ASW skill = +60 exp whatever it is.

AFAIK, ASW is the only skill used in the ASW mission, even though search and bombing are used IRL. Think of the skill as ASW Search and ASW bombing combined into one skill called ASW.
Pax
User avatar
nate25
Posts: 1190
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:17 pm
Location: Fishers Indiana

RE: ASW Altitude

Post by nate25 »

Wow.

I've been training squadrons slated for ASW duty in all 3 skills. Guess I overdid it.

Which is typical of this idiot.
I have a subtle and cunning plan.
User avatar
derhexer
Posts: 251
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:04 am

RE: ASW Altitude

Post by derhexer »

OK, I'll try 1000 and 2000 ft. for ASW patrols.

Now
what are better planes to use for ASW patrol - float planes, torpedo bombers or dive bombers? I'll pull the TBs and DBs off for naval attack if I think I'll be getting into a fight with a carrier TF, but if I'm cruising to a site, are there better planes to use?

I'm using the smaller CVEs to provide ASW patrols and CAP for tankers/transports that they are escorting.
Chris
(Did you ever stop to think and forget to start?)
User avatar
Disco Duck
Posts: 552
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:25 pm
Location: San Antonio

RE: ASW Altitude

Post by Disco Duck »

You might want to check this article out.
http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USN/rep ... SW-13.html

It has a good description of search techniques
There is no point in believing in things that exist. -Didactylos
User avatar
LoBaron
Posts: 4775
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria

RE: ASW Altitude

Post by LoBaron »

ORIGINAL: nate25

Wow.

I've been training squadrons slated for ASW duty in all 3 skills. Guess I overdid it.

Which is typical of this idiot.

Not at all. ASW was a wildly debated topic some time ago.

Personally, if I just need some fast ASW I train ASW, thats enough.
But I prefer to crosstrain my units, time given, to maximize my flexibility when cooping with different threats. So in my
opinion this is not overdoing it.

Also don´t forget that subs are spotted by NavS as well, and since ASW cuts mission range to 50% (rounded down),
it is not always the optimal choice, more so if your airborne ASW is to detect and you got ASW TFs to then take care
of the subs spotted.

I would not train NavB though, but LowN instead if you want to add this to your skills. Reason is not that its needed
for ASW, but that you usually set ASW to LowN altitudes and so potentially are able to cover two mission types
(ASW/LowN) with one squadron. In many PBEMs there is a HR though preventing heavies from being used below 10k
against naval targets, to obviousely this rule applies to mediums or smaller.
Image
User avatar
Justus2
Posts: 805
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 11:56 pm

RE: ASW Altitude

Post by Justus2 »

What about plane types? I have had good luck with using float planes (Kingfisher) when available, or the PBYs (but they are usually too valuable in long-range search or transport missions). At the start of the campaign, though, I usually assign some of my 2E (B18 Bolos, I have plenty), but I don't know if they are best suited for it or not?
Just when I get the hang of a game, I buy two more... :)
User avatar
nate25
Posts: 1190
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:17 pm
Location: Fishers Indiana

RE: ASW Altitude

Post by nate25 »

LoBaron,

Thanks for the tips. I'll try them. I've been training Kingfishers for ASW (1000') and PBYs (6000') for NavS. It's too early to tell how that'll work out.

Interesting HR on the 4Es. IRL, weren't a good number of B-17s used for search early on?

Justus2,

I have considered using Bolos out of Alaska for search. Is that working? Op losses real bad or not?

Thanks,
Nate
I have a subtle and cunning plan.
Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”